Nationalism in India Class 10: Notes, Concepts and Answers
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Nationalism in India is Chapter 2 of Class 10 History. It traces the national movement from 1919 to the 1930s: the First World War's effects, satyagraha, the Rowlatt Act, Khilafat and Non-Cooperation, the Salt March and Civil Disobedience, and how symbols built collective belonging. The board asks MCQs, 3- and 5-mark answers, source passages and map items.
What Nationalism in India is about
This chapter picks up India's freedom struggle from 1919. It begins with how the First World War caused hardship and anger. It then follows Gandhiji's method of satyagraha, the Rowlatt satyagraha, Jallianwala Bagh, the Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movement, and the Salt March that began Civil Disobedience. A key idea runs through every section: peasants, tribals, workers, business groups, women, dalits and Muslims all joined for their own reasons, so swaraj meant different things to different people. The chapter ends by showing how images, songs, folklore, flags and history writing made people feel they belonged to one nation.
It links back to Chapter 1, The Rise of Nationalism in Europe. There, nationalism built nation-states. In India, it grew out of the fight against colonial rule. Bharat Mata can be compared with Germania, and the use of folklore and symbols has parallels in Europe too.
Board questions come in several shapes. You may get MCQs and assertion-reason items on dates, people and causes, and picture-based items on processions or Bharat Mata. There are 3-mark questions asking you to explain or compare, such as Non-Cooperation against Civil Disobedience. There are 5-mark questions asking you to analyse a movement, for example its economic effects or why groups joined it. Source-based passages and a 2-mark map question are drawn from the official map list.
Weightage: History carries 20 of the 80 theory marks; this chapter shares them with The Rise of Nationalism in Europe, The Making of a Global World and Print Culture and the Modern World.Source: CBSE Social Science syllabus 2026-27, History
In real board papers: asked in 21 of the 21 board papers we hold (2023 to 2026), on average 9.4 marks per paper. See the questions
Key concepts
- The First World War and its effects on India
- NCERT section 1 The First World War, Khilafat and Non-Cooperation
Nationalism in India grew out of the struggle against colonial rule. Being oppressed together gave very different groups a shared bond, even though each group felt colonialism differently. The First World War sharpened this feeling in three ways.
- Money: defence spending rose hugely. The British paid for it with war loans and higher taxes: customs duties went up and income tax was introduced.
- Prices: prices doubled between 1913 and 1918, so ordinary families suffered badly.
- People: villages had to supply soldiers, and forced recruitment in rural areas made people angry.
Then crops failed in 1918-19 and 1920-21, food ran short and an influenza epidemic spread. The 1921 census counted 12 to 13 million deaths from famines and the epidemic. People expected their hardships to end after the war, but they did not. This frustration explains why, after 1919, the movement spread to new areas, drew in new social groups and tried new methods of struggle. In answers, always link the war to both economic hardship and political anger.
Worked example
Explain how the First World War changed India's money matters and politics in ways that helped the national movement grow. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Defence expenditure rose sharply. It was paid for through war loans and higher taxes: customs duties were raised and income tax was introduced. (1)
- Prices doubled between 1913 and 1918, causing extreme hardship for common people. (1)
- Forced recruitment of soldiers in villages caused widespread anger. Crop failures and an influenza epidemic killed 12 to 13 million people. Hardships did not end after the war, so discontent turned against British rule. (1)
Answer: - Defence spending rose and was met by war loans, higher customs duties and a new income tax.
- Prices doubled between 1913 and 1918, causing hardship.
- Forced recruitment in villages angered people, and crop failures and influenza killed 12 to 13 million.
Relief did not come after the war, so this anger strengthened the national movement.- The Idea of Satyagraha
- NCERT section 1.1 The Idea of Satyagraha
Satyagraha was the method of mass agitation Gandhiji had used successfully against the racist regime in South Africa. He returned to India in January 1915. Satyagraha rests on the power of truth. If your cause is true and you are fighting injustice, you do not need physical force. A satyagrahi does not seek revenge and is not aggressive. Instead, he appeals to the conscience of the oppressor, so that even the oppressor is persuaded to see the truth. Gandhiji believed truth must finally win. He thought non-violence was a duty that every Indian could share, and so it could bring them all together.
Satyagraha is not 'doing nothing'. Gandhiji said it was not passive resistance: it called for intense activity and could be used only by the strong.
He tested it locally before going national:
- 1917, Champaran (Bihar): peasants against the oppressive plantation system.
- 1918, Ahmedabad: cotton mill workers.
- 1918, Kheda district (Gujarat): peasants hit by crop failure and plague, who could not pay revenue, asked for revenue collection to be relaxed.
These successes gave him the confidence for a nationwide satyagraha in 1919.
Worked example
A classmate says, 'Satyagraha was only for people who were too weak to fight.' Using Gandhiji's idea of satyagraha and his early movements in India, show why this view is wrong. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Gandhiji said satyagraha was not passive resistance. It called for intense activity and could be used only by the strong. (1)
- It rested on truth and non-violence. The satyagrahi did not seek revenge but appealed to the oppressor's conscience to win him over. This needs courage, not weakness. (1)
- Its strength was proved in action: peasants of Champaran (1917), cotton mill workers of Ahmedabad (1918) and peasants of Kheda (1918) were mobilised successfully. (1)
Answer: The view is wrong.
- Gandhiji called satyagraha active, not passive. It needed intense activity and only the strong could use it.
- It used truth and non-violence to appeal to the oppressor's conscience, without revenge.
- It successfully mobilised Champaran peasants (1917), Ahmedabad mill workers (1918) and Kheda peasants (1918).- The Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh
- NCERT section 1.2 The Rowlatt Act
The Rowlatt Act of 1919 was pushed through the Imperial Legislative Council in a hurry, although every Indian member opposed it. Under it, the government could crush political activity and keep political prisoners locked up for two years without a trial. Indians saw it as an unjust law. Gandhiji called for non-violent civil disobedience, starting with a hartal on 6 April 1919.
The response was big: rallies in cities, strikes in railway workshops, shops shut. The British feared that railways and telegraph lines would be disrupted. So they picked up local leaders in Amritsar and barred Gandhiji from entering Delhi. On 10 April, police in Amritsar fired on a peaceful procession. Angry crowds then attacked banks, post offices and railway stations, martial law followed and General Dyer was put in charge.
On 13 April, at Jallianwala Bagh, Dyer sealed the way out and fired on a crowd of protesters and Baisakhi fair visitors, killing hundreds. He said he wanted to 'produce a moral effect' of terror. The government answered the protests that followed with brutal, humiliating punishments. When the violence kept spreading, Gandhiji stopped the satyagraha. Remember: the Rowlatt satyagraha was widespread but stayed mostly in cities and towns.
Worked example
Explain how the British response turned the peaceful Rowlatt satyagraha into widespread unrest, and why this led Gandhiji to call it off. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Act (1919) let the government repress political activity and hold political prisoners for two years without trial. Gandhiji began a peaceful protest with a hartal on 6 April: rallies, railway workshop strikes and closed shops. (1)
- Fearing that railways and telegraph would be disrupted, the British arrested local leaders in Amritsar and barred Gandhiji from Delhi. This repression provoked people further. (1)
- On 10 April police fired on a peaceful procession in Amritsar. Crowds attacked banks, post offices and railway stations, and martial law was imposed under General Dyer. (1)
- On 13 April Dyer fired on the crowd at Jallianwala Bagh, killing hundreds, to create terror. The news set off strikes, clashes and attacks on government buildings in north Indian towns. (1)
- The government replied with humiliating repression: crawling orders, flogging and bombing of villages around Gujranwala. Since satyagraha had to stay non-violent and violence was spreading, Gandhiji called it off. (1)
Answer: - The Act allowed repression and detention without trial for two years, so Gandhiji began a peaceful hartal on 6 April.
- Fearing disruption of railways and telegraph, the British arrested Amritsar leaders and barred Gandhiji from Delhi, which inflamed people.
- Firing on a peaceful procession on 10 April led to attacks on banks, post offices and stations, and martial law under Dyer.
- The Jallianwala Bagh firing of 13 April killed hundreds and set off strikes and clashes in north Indian towns.
- Crawling orders, flogging and bombing near Gujranwala deepened the anger. As violence spread against the spirit of satyagraha, Gandhiji called the movement off.- Khilafat and the logic of Non-Cooperation
- NCERT section 1.3 Why Non-cooperation?
After the Rowlatt satyagraha, Gandhiji wanted a more broad-based movement. He was sure this could not happen unless Hindus and Muslims came closer together. The Khilafat issue gave him that chance.
Ottoman Turkey had been defeated in the First World War. There were rumours of a harsh peace treaty on the Ottoman emperor, the Khalifa, who was the spiritual head of the Islamic world. A Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay in March 1919 to defend his temporal powers. Young leaders like the brothers Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali discussed united mass action with Gandhiji.
Why non-cooperation? In Hind Swaraj (1909), Gandhiji argued that British rule survived only because Indians cooperated. If they stopped, it would collapse within a year and swaraj would come.
The movement was to unfold in stages. First came surrender of government titles, then a boycott of civil services, army, police, courts, legislative councils, schools and foreign goods. If the government used repression, full civil disobedience would follow.
Many in the Congress hesitated. They did not want to boycott the November 1920 council elections and feared violence. Gandhiji convinced leaders at Calcutta (September 1920), and the programme was adopted after a compromise at Nagpur (December 1920).
Worked example
Read the statements and choose the correct option.
Assertion (A): Gandhiji decided to take up the Khilafat issue after the Rowlatt satyagraha.
Reason (R): He believed that no broad-based movement could be organised without bringing Hindus and Muslims closer together.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true. (1 mark)Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A is true: after the Rowlatt satyagraha, which was mostly urban, Gandhiji took up the Khilafat issue.
- R is true: he felt a broad-based movement needed Hindu-Muslim unity, and Khilafat could bring Muslims into a unified national movement. R explains why he did A. (1)
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- Non-Cooperation in the Towns
- NCERT section 2.1 The Movement in the Towns
The Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement began in January 1921. In the cities, the middle class led the way. Many students quit government-run schools and colleges, teachers and headmasters resigned, and lawyers stopped practising in courts. Most provinces boycotted the council elections. Madras was the exception. There the Justice Party, which spoke for non-Brahmans, contested because a council seat offered power that had usually stayed with Brahmans.
The boldest results came in the economy. People refused foreign goods, protesters blocked the entrances of liquor shops, and piles of foreign cloth were set on fire. Foreign cloth imports roughly halved from 1921 to 1922: from Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore. Many merchants would not deal in foreign goods or lend money for foreign trade. As more people switched to Indian cloth, Indian mills and handlooms produced more.
But the city movement lost speed. Khadi usually cost more than factory-made mill cloth, so poor buyers could not stick with it. A boycott of British institutions also needs Indian replacements, and these were slow to appear. So students, teachers and lawyers gradually went back. A good answer gives both sides: the success and the reasons for slowing down.
Worked example
Assess the effects of the Non-Cooperation Movement on the economic front in the towns, and explain why the movement in the cities gradually slowed down. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- People refused foreign goods, picketed liquor shops and set foreign cloth on fire in public bonfires. (1)
- Foreign cloth imports roughly halved between 1921 and 1922: from Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore. (1)
- Many merchants would not deal in or finance foreign goods, and Indian mills and handlooms raised their output. (1)
- Slowdown: khadi usually cost more than mill cloth, so poor people could not keep up the boycott for long. (1)
- Slowdown: Indian replacements for British schools and courts came up slowly, so students, teachers and lawyers went back. (1)
Answer: Economic effects:
- People refused foreign goods, picketed liquor shops and burnt foreign cloth in public.
- Foreign cloth imports roughly halved between 1921 and 1922, from Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore.
- Many merchants stopped dealing in or financing foreign goods, and Indian mills and handlooms produced more.
Why it slowed:
- Khadi usually cost more than mill cloth, so the poor could not stay away from mill cloth for long.
- Indian replacements for British institutions were slow to appear, so students, teachers and lawyers returned to government schools and courts.- Swaraj in the Countryside and Plantations
- NCERT section 2.2 Rebellion in the Countryside
From the towns, the movement spread to villages and forests. Each group joined for its own reasons, so swaraj meant something different to each.
- Awadh peasants: they were led by Baba Ramchandra, a sanyasi who had been an indentured labourer in Fiji. Talukdars and landlords squeezed them with very high rents and extra cesses, made them work unpaid (begar) and kept evicting tenants. The peasants wanted revenue cut, forced labour ended and harsh landlords shunned by the village. Panchayats organised nai-dhobi bandhs so that landlords lost even the services of barbers and washermen. Jawaharlal Nehru began touring Awadh villages in June 1920 to hear their grievances. By October the Oudh Kisan Sabha was set up, headed by Nehru, Baba Ramchandra and others, and within a month it had over 300 branches in the villages. The Congress then tried to fold this struggle into Non-Cooperation. On 6 January 1921 police fired at peasants near Rae Bareli. Nehru later wrote that his anger nearly made him forget non-violence, but the calm peasants and the thought of Gandhiji steadied him, and the crowd dispersed peacefully. Elsewhere in 1921, however, talukdars' houses were attacked, bazaars looted and grain hoards seized, and local leaders used Gandhiji's name to justify it. The Congress leadership was unhappy with this.
- Gudem Hills tribals (Andhra Pradesh): the government closed forests and forced begar for road building. Alluri Sitaram Raju praised Gandhiji but said India could be freed only by force, and he led guerrilla warfare. He was executed in 1924.
- Assam plantation workers: under the Inland Emigration Act of 1859, they could not leave the tea gardens without permission. To them swaraj meant freedom to move and to keep links with their villages.
By acting in Gandhiji's name, all these groups linked local struggles to an all-India movement.
Worked example
Explain how the peasants of Awadh, the tribals of the Gudem Hills and the plantation workers of Assam each understood swaraj in their own way during the Non-Cooperation Movement. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Awadh peasants under Baba Ramchandra saw swaraj as relief from talukdars and landlords. They wanted revenue cut, forced labour ended and oppressive landlords shunned. (1)
- Gudem tribals saw it as restoring forest rights and ending forced begar. Led by Alluri Sitaram Raju, they believed India could be liberated only by force and waged guerrilla warfare. (1)
- Assam plantation workers saw swaraj as the right to move freely out of the tea gardens and keep links with their villages. They left the plantations, believing Gandhi Raj would give them land. (1)
Answer: - Awadh peasants: swaraj meant freedom from landlords: lower revenue, no unpaid labour, harsh landlords shunned.
- Gudem tribals: swaraj meant forest rights and no forced begar. Under Alluri Sitaram Raju they used guerrilla force.
- Assam plantation workers: swaraj meant freedom to leave tea gardens and return to their villages, expecting land under Gandhi Raj.- Towards Civil Disobedience and the Salt March
- NCERT section 3.1 The Salt March and the Civil Disobedience Movement
In February 1922, after a violent clash at Chauri Chaura, Gandhiji withdrew Non-Cooperation. He thought the volunteers were not yet trained for mass action. C. R. Das and Motilal Nehru formed the Swaraj Party to return to council politics. Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose wanted radical mass agitation and full independence.
Two factors revived the struggle. Farm prices began sliding in 1926 and crashed after 1930, so peasants could not sell their crops or pay revenue. And the Simon Commission, which had no Indian member at all, reached India in 1928 and met protests with the slogan 'Go back Simon'. In December 1929, the Lahore Congress under Nehru demanded Purna Swaraj, and 26 January 1930 was celebrated as Independence Day.
That idea felt abstract, so Gandhiji chose salt. Rich and poor both ate it, and the government taxed it and held a monopoly over its production. His letter of 31 January 1930 with eleven demands was ignored. He then walked with 78 volunteers over 240 miles from Sabarmati to Dandi in 24 days, and made salt on 6 April. People were now asked to break colonial laws, not just refuse cooperation. The Gandhi-Irwin Pact (5 March 1931) paused the movement. It was relaunched in 1932 and had lost momentum by 1934.
Worked example
Distinguish between the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Civil Disobedience Movement on any three points. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Method: in Non-Cooperation, people refused to cooperate with the British (titles, schools, courts, councils, foreign goods). In Civil Disobedience, they also broke colonial laws, such as the salt law and forest laws. (1)
- Launch and aim: Non-Cooperation began in January 1921 in support of Khilafat and swaraj. Civil Disobedience began with the Salt March to Dandi in 1930, after the Lahore Congress demanded Purna Swaraj. (1)
- End: Non-Cooperation was withdrawn in February 1922 after Chauri Chaura. Civil Disobedience was called off with the Gandhi-Irwin Pact in March 1931, relaunched in 1932 and had lost momentum by 1934. (1)
Answer: - Method: Non-Cooperation meant refusing cooperation. Civil Disobedience also meant breaking colonial laws, such as the salt law.
- Aim: Non-Cooperation (1921) backed Khilafat and swaraj. Civil Disobedience (1930) followed the Purna Swaraj demand.
- End: Non-Cooperation was withdrawn after Chauri Chaura (1922). Civil Disobedience paused with the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931), was relaunched in 1932 and faded by 1934.- How Groups saw Civil Disobedience and its Limits
- NCERT section 3.3 The Limits of Civil Disobedience
Each group joined Civil Disobedience for its own reasons.
- Rich peasants (Patidars of Gujarat, Jats of Uttar Pradesh): they grew commercial crops and were hit by falling prices. They could not pay revenue, so swaraj meant lower revenue. When the movement ended in 1931 without revised rates, many refused to rejoin in 1932.
- Poor peasants: these small tenants wanted unpaid rent remitted. The Congress avoided 'no rent' campaigns for fear of upsetting rich peasants and landlords.
- Business classes: they wanted protection from imports and a rupee-sterling ratio that discouraged imports, and formed FICCI in 1927. They gave money and refused imported goods, but cooled after the Round Table Conference failed.
- Industrial workers: they joined in small numbers, mostly in the Nagpur region. The Congress kept their demands out to avoid alienating industrialists.
- Women: they joined in large numbers, but the Congress gave them little authority.
There were also limits. Dalit leaders such as Dr B.R. Ambedkar wanted separate electorates. The Poona Pact (September 1932) instead gave reserved seats elected by the general electorate.
Many Muslims felt alienated after Khilafat declined, as the Congress seemed close to the Hindu Mahasabha and riots widened the gap. In 1927 unity with the Muslim League looked possible. The sticking point was representation in future assemblies. Muhammad Ali Jinnah offered to drop the demand for separate electorates if Muslims were given reserved seats in the Central Assembly and seats in proportion to their population in Bengal and Punjab. Hope collapsed at the All Parties Conference of 1928, when M.R. Jayakar of the Hindu Mahasabha strongly opposed a compromise. So when Civil Disobedience began, distrust was high and many Muslims feared domination by a Hindu majority.
Worked example
'The Civil Disobedience Movement could not unite all Indians.' Examine the statement with reference to dalits and Muslims. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Congress had long ignored dalits for fear of offending the sanatanis (conservative high-caste Hindus). Many dalit leaders wanted a political solution: reserved seats in education and a separate electorate. (1)
- Dr B.R. Ambedkar organised the Depressed Classes Association in 1930 and demanded separate electorates at the second Round Table Conference. Gandhiji's fast unto death led to the Poona Pact (1932): reserved seats, but voted in by the general electorate. Dalit participation stayed limited, especially in Maharashtra and Nagpur. (1)
- After the Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement declined, many Muslims felt alienated from the Congress. It was seen as close to Hindu religious nationalist groups like the Hindu Mahasabha. (1)
- Communal riots deepened the distance. Unity talks of 1927 failed over representation when M.R. Jayakar of the Hindu Mahasabha opposed compromise at the All Parties Conference of 1928. (1)
- Muslims feared that minority culture and identity would be submerged under a Hindu majority, so large sections did not respond to the call for united struggle. (1)
Answer: - The Congress had long ignored dalits to avoid offending the sanatanis. Dalit leaders sought political empowerment through reserved seats and separate electorates.
- Ambedkar demanded separate electorates at the second Round Table Conference. After Gandhiji's fast, the Poona Pact (1932) gave reserved seats elected by the general electorate. Dalit participation stayed limited, especially in Maharashtra and Nagpur.
- After Khilafat declined, many Muslims felt alienated as the Congress seemed linked to the Hindu Mahasabha.
- Riots widened the gap, and unity talks collapsed at the 1928 All Parties Conference when M.R. Jayakar opposed compromise.
- Muslims feared domination by a Hindu majority, so many stayed away.- The Sense of Collective Belonging
- NCERT section 4 The Sense of Collective Belonging
Nationalism spreads when people believe they belong to one nation. United struggles helped, but culture did too.
- Bharat Mata: Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay created the image. He wrote 'Vande Mataram' in the 1870s, later included it in his novel Anandamath, and it was sung in the Swadeshi movement. Abanindranath Tagore painted Bharat Mata as calm, composed, divine and spiritual. Devotion to her came to be seen as proof of nationalism.
- Folklore: nationalists collected folk tales and songs, believing they showed true traditional culture damaged by outside forces. Rabindranath Tagore collected ballads and nursery rhymes in Bengal. Natesa Sastri published The Folklore of Southern India, a collection of Tamil folk tales.
- Flags: the Swadeshi tricolour (red, green, yellow) had eight lotuses for eight provinces and a crescent moon. Gandhiji's Swaraj flag (1921: red, green, white) had a spinning wheel for self-help. Holding it aloft became an act of defiance.
- History: Indians rewrote history to show glorious ancient achievements, answering the British claim that Indians were backward.
The weakness: when the past and the images were Hindu, other communities felt left out.
Worked example
Two images of Bharat Mata are described. Image 1 shows a calm, ascetic mother holding a mala and giving learning, food and clothing. Image 2 shows her with a trishul, standing beside a lion and an elephant. Explain how each image could build nationalism, and why such images might not appeal to all communities. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Image 1 (Abanindranath Tagore) shows the nation as calm, divine and spiritual, a caring mother who provides for her children. It inspires devotion to the motherland. (1)
- Image 2 uses the lion and elephant as symbols of power and authority. It presents the nation as strong and inspires courage and sacrifice. (1)
- Both draw on Hindu iconography. When images celebrated were drawn from Hindu traditions, people of other communities felt left out, which weakened unity. (1)
Answer: - Image 1 shows a calm, spiritual mother giving learning, food and clothing. It inspires devotion to the motherland.
- Image 2, with a trishul, lion and elephant, shows power and authority. It inspires strength and sacrifice.
- Both use Hindu iconography, so people of other communities could feel left out, limiting unity.- Boxes in the chapter: Bardoli, the HSRA and Quit India
- NCERT section 3 Towards Civil Disobedience
Three boxes in the chapter add to the main story. Learn their facts, because source passages can be built on them.
- Bardoli Satyagraha (1928): Vallabhbhai Patel led the peasants of Bardoli, a taluka in Gujarat, against an increase in land revenue. The struggle succeeded, was widely publicised and won sympathy in many parts of India.
- HSRA (1928): some nationalists did not believe non-violence could defeat the British. In 1928 the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army was founded at a meeting at Ferozeshah Kotla ground in Delhi. Its leaders included Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and Ajoy Ghosh. It staged bold attacks on things that stood for British rule. In April 1929, Bhagat Singh and Batukeswar Dutta hurled a bomb inside the Legislative Assembly; later that year there was also an attempt to blow up Lord Irwin's train. Bhagat Singh was tried and executed by the colonial government when he was 23. At his trial he said he did not want to glorify 'the cult of the bomb and pistol'. He wanted a revolution in society, and he called the labourer the real support of society.
- Quit India (1942): the failure of the Cripps Mission and the effects of the Second World War caused deep discontent. On 14 July 1942 the Congress Working Committee, meeting at Wardha, passed the 'Quit India' resolution demanding the immediate transfer of power to Indians. On 8 August 1942 the All India Congress Committee endorsed it in Bombay and called for a non-violent mass struggle across the country. On this occasion Gandhiji gave his 'Do or Die' speech. Students, workers and peasants joined hartals, demonstrations and processions. Its leaders included Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali and Ram Manohar Lohia. Women took part too: Matangini Hazra (Bengal), Kanaklata Barua (Assam) and Rama Devi (Odisha) are among those named. The British used great force, but it still took them more than a year to suppress it.
Together these boxes show that the struggle had many methods and many voices, not one.
Worked example
At his trial, Bhagat Singh said he did not wish to glorify 'the cult of the bomb and pistol'. Using this statement and the HSRA's actions, explain how the HSRA's methods and aims differed from Gandhian satyagraha. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Method: the HSRA believed the British could not be defeated by non-violence, so it struck at symbols of British power, for example the Assembly bomb of April 1929 and the attempt on Lord Irwin's train. Satyagraha rejected physical force and appealed to the oppressor's conscience. (1)
- Aim: Bhagat Singh said he was not glorifying violence for its own sake. He wanted a revolution in society in which the labourer, the real support of society, would matter. (1)
- Comparison: both aimed to end British rule, but satyagraha tried to win over the oppressor through truth, while the HSRA saw attacks on British power as necessary. (1)
Answer: - The HSRA doubted non-violence and attacked symbols of British power, such as the Assembly bomb (1929). Satyagraha rejected force and appealed to the oppressor's conscience.
- Bhagat Singh did not glorify violence; he wanted a revolution in society that valued the labourer.
- Both opposed British rule, but satyagraha sought to persuade, while the HSRA saw force as necessary.
Nationalism in India in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
The Idea of Satyagraha
Suppose students in your school are upset because the canteen has suddenly raised prices without notice. Some want to shout slogans and damage the counter. Others suggest a calm sit-in and a polite letter to the principal explaining the problem.
Using Gandhiji's idea of satyagraha, decide which approach is closer to it and explain why it could work better. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Identify the satyagraha approach: the peaceful sit-in and letter, with no damage or aggression.
- Explain the principle: a just cause does not need force; the aim is to appeal to the conscience of the other side.
- Show why it works: it persuades rather than forces, keeps support from others and stays active, not passive.
Answer: - The sit-in and letter follow satyagraha, because they protest without violence or revenge.
- Satyagraha holds that a just cause needs no force. It appeals to the conscience of those in charge so they see the truth.
- It is active protest, not silence. It wins wider support and persuades rather than forces a change.
Memory hook: Persuade, don't force: a calm sit-in is satyagraha in your school corridor.
Non-Cooperation in the Towns
Imagine your family decides to stop buying imported goods and use only locally made cloth and products. In the first month everyone is excited. Later, the local items turn out to be costlier, and some things have no local substitute at all.
Using the experience of the Non-Cooperation Movement in towns, explain why such a boycott can succeed at first but slow down later. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Early success: enthusiasm leads to an immediate drop in buying foreign goods, as foreign cloth imports fell in 1921-22.
- First problem: cost. Khadi was costlier than mill cloth, so poor people could not sustain the boycott.
- Second problem: alternatives. Without Indian substitutes for British institutions, people drifted back.
Answer: - At first, enthusiasm cuts demand sharply, just as foreign cloth imports halved in 1921-22.
- But if local goods cost more, poorer families cannot keep it up, as happened with costly khadi.
- If no substitutes exist, people return to old choices, as students and lawyers returned to government schools and courts.
Memory hook: A boycott needs two legs: affordable substitutes and real alternatives.
Swaraj in the Countryside and Plantations
Suppose a candidate in your school election promises 'a better school'. Hostel students hope this means better food, sports players hope for a new ground, and day scholars hope for more buses. All of them vote for the same candidate.
Compare this situation with how different groups understood swaraj during the Non-Cooperation Movement. What does it show about unity? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Point out the parallel: one slogan, many meanings, as with swaraj.
- Give chapter examples: Awadh peasants wanted an end to begar and high rents; Assam workers wanted freedom to move; Gudem tribals wanted forest rights.
- Draw the lesson: a shared slogan unites people, but differing hopes can later cause disappointment and split the unity.
Answer: - As 'a better school' meant different things to each group, swaraj meant different things to each group in 1921.
- Awadh peasants wanted an end to begar and high rents, Assam plantation workers wanted freedom to leave the gardens, and Gudem tribals wanted forest rights.
- A common call unites people, but varied hopes can bring disappointment and break unity.
Memory hook: One slogan, many dreams: that is how swaraj worked in 1921.
Towards Civil Disobedience and the Salt March
Imagine your housing colony's residents' group wants every family, rich and poor, to join one campaign. One member suggests protesting about parking fees for cars. Another suggests protesting about a cut in drinking water supply, which affects every household.
Using Gandhiji's choice of salt as a symbol, decide which issue would unite more people and justify your decision. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Choose the water issue, because it affects every family, like salt.
- Link to the chapter: salt was eaten by rich and poor alike and was an essential item, so everyone felt the salt tax.
- Explain the lesson: a concrete everyday issue makes an abstract goal (Purna Swaraj) real and draws all classes into one campaign.
Answer: - The water issue would unite more people, because every household needs water, while parking fees affect only car owners.
- Gandhiji chose salt for the same reason: rich and poor both consumed it, and the salt tax showed the oppressive face of British rule.
- A concrete everyday issue turns an abstract aim into something everyone feels, so all classes join together.
Memory hook: Pick the 'salt' of the problem: the need everyone shares.
The Sense of Collective Belonging
Suppose your school is planning an annual day where students come from families of many regions, languages and religions. The committee wants songs, a flag and stories that make everyone feel part of one school community.
Using the chapter, suggest how symbols and stories can build a sense of belonging, and what the committee must take care to avoid. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Symbols and images: a shared flag or emblem gives people one image to identify with, as Bharat Mata and the Swaraj flag did.
- Stories and songs: folk tales and songs from many regions give pride in a shared past, as folklore collectors believed.
- Caution: if the symbols come from only one community, others feel left out, as happened when Hindu iconography dominated nationalist images.
Answer: - A common flag or emblem gives everyone one symbol to rally around, as the Swaraj flag did in 1921.
- Songs and folk stories from many regions build pride and a shared identity, as nationalists hoped folklore would.
- The committee must include all traditions. When nationalist images drew only on Hindu iconography, other communities felt left out.
Memory hook: A symbol unites only if everyone can see themselves in it.
Topics in this chapter
Nationalism in India: key facts
- Gandhiji's early satyagrahas
- 1917 Champaran (Bihar), plantation system; 1918 Ahmedabad, cotton mill workers; 1918 Kheda (Gujarat), revenue relief
- Use for map questions and for 'how did Gandhiji test satyagraha' answers.
- Rowlatt Act, 1919
- Powers to repress political activity; detention of political prisoners without trial for two years; hartal on 6 April 1919
- Use when asked why Indians were outraged or how the Rowlatt satyagraha began.
- Jallianwala Bagh
- 13 April 1919, Amritsar: General Dyer blocked the exits and fired, killing hundreds, to 'produce a moral effect'
- Map item. Also used in sequence and MCQ questions.
- Khilafat Committee
- Formed in Bombay, March 1919, to defend the Khalifa's temporal powers; Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali
- Use to explain why Gandhiji linked Khilafat to Non-Cooperation: Hindu-Muslim unity.
- Calcutta and Nagpur sessions, 1920
- Calcutta, September 1920: leaders convinced to start Non-Cooperation; Nagpur, December 1920: programme adopted after compromise
- Map items. Do not swap the two.
- Hind Swaraj (1909)
- British rule survived on Indian cooperation; if Indians refused, it would collapse within a year
- The core reasoning behind 'Why Non-cooperation?'
- Non-Cooperation timeline
- Launched January 1921; withdrawn February 1922 after Chauri Chaura (Gorakhpur) turned violent
- Use for 'why was the movement withdrawn' and comparison questions.
- Economic effect in towns
- Foreign cloth imports halved 1921-22: Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore
- Know these figures exactly and use them as evidence in any answer on the economic effects of Non-Cooperation.
- Key terms
Begar unpaid forced labour Picket blocking entry to a shop, factory or office Boycott refusing to deal with, buy or use Forced recruitment compulsory army enlistment - 1- and 2-mark definition questions. Use the term inside longer answers too.
- Inland Emigration Act, 1859
- Plantation workers in Assam could not leave tea gardens without permission
- Explains what swaraj meant to plantation workers.
- Simon Commission, 1928
Name Statutory Commission under Sir John Simon Set up by the Tory government Indian members none Response 'Go back Simon' - Use as a cause of Civil Disobedience along with the economic depression.
- Lahore Congress, December 1929
- Under Jawaharlal Nehru, demanded Purna Swaraj; 26 January 1930 celebrated as Independence Day
- Separates the aim of Civil Disobedience from that of Non-Cooperation.
- Dandi March
- 78 volunteers, over 240 miles, Sabarmati to Dandi (Gujarati coastal town), 24 days; salt made on 6 April 1930
- Map item. Know these numbers exactly; MCQ options may mix them up.
- Gandhi-Irwin Pact and after
5 March 1931 Gandhiji agreed to attend the Round Table Conference, prisoners released December 1931 second Round Table Conference 1932 relaunch By 1934 lost momentum - Use for the end of Civil Disobedience and for why rich peasants felt let down.
- Poona Pact, September 1932
- Depressed Classes got reserved seats in provincial and central councils, voted in by the general electorate
- Limits of Civil Disobedience. Do not confuse separate electorates with reserved seats.
- Flags as symbols
- Swadeshi flag: red, green, yellow, eight lotuses, crescent moon; Swaraj flag (1921): red, green, white, spinning wheel
- Collective belonging questions and MCQs on symbols.
- Oudh Kisan Sabha
- Set up by October 1920, headed by Jawaharlal Nehru, Baba Ramchandra and others; over 300 village branches within a month
- Shows how the Congress tried to bring the Awadh peasants into the wider struggle.
- Rae Bareli firing
Date 6 January 1921 Event police in the United Provinces fired at peasants near Rae Bareli Nehru spoke of non-violence, peasants dispersed peacefully - Source on how a leader kept peasant anger non-violent.
- Bardoli Satyagraha
- 1928, Bardoli taluka (Gujarat): Vallabhbhai Patel led peasants against an increase in land revenue; it succeeded
- Do not confuse with Kheda (1918), where Gandhiji backed peasants seeking relaxed revenue collection.
- HSRA
- Hindustan Socialist Republican Army, founded 1928 at Ferozeshah Kotla ground, Delhi; leaders Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das, Ajoy Ghosh
- Shows that some nationalists rejected non-violence.
- Assembly bomb, April 1929
Who Bhagat Singh and Batukeswar Dutta What bomb in the Legislative Assembly Same year attempt to blow up Lord Irwin's train - Bhagat Singh, executed at 23, said he wanted a revolution in society, not to glorify violence.
- Congress-League talks, 1927-28
Jinnah's offer drop separate electorates In return reserved seats in the Central Assembly, population-based seats in Bengal and Punjab 1928 All Parties Conference M.R. Jayakar's opposition ended hope - Explains why many Muslims stayed away from Civil Disobedience.
- Quit India, 1942
14 July 1942 Wardha resolution 8 August 1942 endorsed in Bombay, Gandhiji's 'Do or Die' speech Suppression took the British more than a year - Know the participants: Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali, Ram Manohar Lohia; Matangini Hazra, Kanaklata Barua, Rama Devi.
Nationalism in India: map work
The places on the official CBSE map list for this chapter. Find each one on an outline map of India and practise marking it.
| Map item | Where it is | How to mark it |
|---|---|---|
| Congress session, September 1920: Calcutta | Calcutta, where the Congress met in September 1920. Here Gandhiji convinced other leaders to start non-cooperation in support of Khilafat and for swaraj. | Find the head of the Bay of Bengal in the east, in present-day West Bengal. Put a dot just inland near the coast and write 'Calcutta (1920 session)' beside it. |
| Congress session, December 1920: Nagpur | Nagpur, where the Congress met in December 1920. A compromise was reached there and the Non-Cooperation programme was adopted. The NCERT text also mentions the 'Nagpur region' as a place where workers joined Civil Disobedience. | Nagpur lies almost at the centre of India, in present-day Maharashtra. Put a dot in the middle of the map and label it 'Nagpur (1920 session)'. |
| Congress session, 1927: Madras | Madras, the place of the 1927 Congress session named in the official map list. In the NCERT text, Madras is the province where the Justice Party contested council elections during Non-Cooperation. | Madras is present-day Chennai in Tamil Nadu, on the eastern coast of the southern peninsula. Mark a dot on the coastline and label 'Madras (1927 session)'. |
| Satyagraha movement: Champaran | Champaran in Bihar. In 1917 Gandhiji went there to inspire peasants to struggle against the oppressive plantation system. | Look at northern Bihar, close to the border with Nepal. Put a dot there and label 'Champaran (1917)'. |
| Satyagraha movement: Kheda | Kheda district of Gujarat. In 1918 Gandhiji organised a satyagraha there for peasants who could not pay revenue after crop failure and a plague epidemic. | In Gujarat, find Ahmedabad. Kheda lies a little south of it. Put a dot there and label 'Kheda (1918)', taking care not to overlap the Ahmedabad label. |
| Satyagraha movement: Ahmedabad mill workers | Ahmedabad. In 1918 Gandhiji went there to organise a satyagraha among cotton mill workers. | Ahmedabad is in eastern-central Gujarat, north of Kheda. Put a dot there and label 'Ahmedabad (mill workers, 1918)'. |
| Jallianwala Bagh | Jallianwala Bagh, an enclosed ground in Amritsar, Punjab. General Dyer fired on a crowd there on 13 April 1919. | Amritsar is in north-western Punjab, near the border with Pakistan. Put a dot and label 'Amritsar (Jallianwala Bagh)'. |
| Dandi March | Dandi, a coastal town in Gujarat. The march began at Gandhiji's ashram in Sabarmati, covered over 240 miles and reached Dandi on 6 April 1930. | Mark Dandi as a dot on the southern Gujarat coast (Arabian Sea side). If asked, draw an arrow from Sabarmati near Ahmedabad south to Dandi and label 'Dandi (Salt March, 1930)'. |
How the board asks Nationalism in India
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| MCQ and assertion-reason | One-mark items on dates (Rowlatt, Jallianwala Bagh, Lahore), people (Baba Ramchandra, Alluri Sitaram Raju, C. R. Das), terms (begar, picket) or a cause-and-effect pair in A-R form. | For A-R, test A and R separately against the text first. Then ask: does R actually explain A? For dates, learn events in pairs (Calcutta then Nagpur; Chauri Chaura then withdrawal). |
| Picture or source identification | A described image, such as a procession, a Bharat Mata painting or the boycott of foreign cloth, and you name the movement, artist or idea. | Look for clues: a spinning wheel or khadi points to Gandhian movements; salt-making points to Civil Disobedience; a calm ascetic Bharat Mata is Abanindranath Tagore's. |
| Short answers (2 and 3 marks) | Explain, give reasons or distinguish: role of the anti-colonial movement, why the Rowlatt Act angered Indians, why Non-Cooperation was withdrawn, Non-Cooperation against Civil Disobedience. | One value point per mark, each a full sentence with a fact from the text. Keep to 40 words for 2 marks and 60 words for 3 marks. |
| Long answer (5 marks) | Analyse or evaluate: economic effects of Non-Cooperation, why different groups joined Civil Disobedience, the role of business classes, limits of Civil Disobedience, cultural processes of nationalism. | Write five separate points, each with a group, a reason and an example. Where the question has two parts (effects and decline, joined and stayed away), divide the points between them. Stay within 120 words. |
| Source-based (4 marks) | A passage on a topic such as satyagraha, the HSRA, the Independence Day pledge or Quit India, followed by parts worth 1, 1 and 2 marks. | Answer the 1-mark parts straight from the passage. For the 2-mark part, link the passage to chapter knowledge with two clear points. |
| Map work (2 marks) | Identify or locate places from the official list: Calcutta (1920), Nagpur (1920) and Madras (1927) Congress sessions, Champaran, Kheda, Ahmedabad, Jallianwala Bagh (Amritsar), Dandi. | Learn each item with its event and year. Practise marking them on an outline map of India so you can recognise them from their position. |
| HOTS and competency | A new situation: judge a claim about satyagraha, explain why a symbol would or would not unite everyone, or decide why a group stayed away from a movement. | Name the concept, apply it to the situation, and support it with one fact from the chapter. Avoid general opinions without evidence. |
Tricks to remember Nationalism in India
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
CAK order for early satyagrahas
'Come And Know': Champaran 1917, then Ahmedabad 1918 and Kheda 1918. C is the only one in 1917 and the only one in Bihar.
Use it when: Map questions and MCQs on Gandhiji's first movements in India.
C before N: Calcutta convinces, Nagpur nods
Alphabet order matches time order. Calcutta (September 1920) is where Gandhiji convinced leaders; Nagpur (December 1920) is where they nodded yes and adopted the programme.
Use it when: Avoid swapping the two 1920 sessions in MCQs and map items.
Dandi numbers: 78-240-24-6
78 people, 240 miles, 24 days, salt on 6 April. The people number is the smallest in your head, the miles the biggest.
Use it when: MCQs that mix up volunteers, miles and days.
Refuse vs Break
Non-Cooperation = Refuse (to cooperate). Civil Disobedience = Refuse + Break (colonial laws). The longer name does more.
Use it when: The opening line of any Non-Cooperation vs Civil Disobedience comparison.
Who joined Civil Disobedience: RP-PP-B-W-W
Rich Peasants, Poor Peasants, Business, Workers, Women. Then the two 'limits': Dalits and Muslims.
Use it when: Planning a 5-mark 'how different groups saw the movement' answer in seconds.
Flag colour check
Swadeshi flag has Yellow (and lotuses); Swaraj flag has White (and the spinning wheel). Think 'W for wheel, W for white'.
Use it when: MCQs on symbols in the collective belonging section.
Nationalism in India: board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: The exception in the council boycott · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
During the Non-Cooperation Movement, council elections were boycotted in most provinces. In Madras, one party contested them because it saw the council as a way to gain power that usually only Brahmans had. Which party was this?
(a) The Swaraj Party
(b) The Justice Party
(c) The Muslim League
(d) The Hindu Mahasabha
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Recall that Madras was the exception to the boycott of council elections.
- The party of the non-Brahmans in Madras was the Justice Party.
- Rule out (a): the Swaraj Party was formed after 1922 by C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru, so it did not exist yet.
Answer: (b) The Justice Party
Example 2: Identify two places on the map · 2 marks · Map workBoard level
On an outline map of India, two places are marked A and B. Identify them and write their names.
A: the place where the Congress session of December 1920 adopted the Non-Cooperation programme.
B: the place in Gujarat where Gandhiji organised a satyagraha in 1918 for peasants who could not pay revenue.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A: the December 1920 session that adopted Non-Cooperation was held at Nagpur, near the centre of India (1 mark).
- B: the 1918 peasant satyagraha over revenue, after crop failure and plague, was in Kheda district of Gujarat (1 mark).
Answer: A: Nagpur. B: Kheda (Gujarat).
Example 3: Why rich peasants stayed away in 1932 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonBoard level
Read the statements and choose the correct option.
Assertion (A): Many rich peasants refused to take part when the Civil Disobedience Movement was restarted in 1932.
Reason (R): The movement had been called off in 1931 without the revenue rates being revised.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Check A: true. The chapter says many rich peasants refused to join in 1932.
- Check R: true. The movement ended in 1931 with no change in revenue rates.
- Link them: for rich peasants, swaraj meant a fight against high revenue. Since revenue was not reduced, they felt let down. So R explains A.
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Example 4: Congress caution over peasants and workers · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Explain why the Congress was reluctant to support the demands of poor peasants and industrial workers during the Civil Disobedience Movement. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Poor peasants were small tenants who, as the Depression went on, could not pay their rent and wanted it written off. The Congress worried that taking this up would anger rich peasants and landlords, so in most places it kept away from 'no rent' campaigns.
- Poor peasants therefore turned to radical movements led by Socialists and Communists, and their ties with the Congress stayed unsure.
- With workers, the Congress feared that including their demands would push industrialists away and split the forces fighting British rule.
Answer: - The Congress feared that backing 'no rent' campaigns would anger rich peasants and landlords, so it mostly stayed out.
- Poor tenants then joined radical movements led by Socialists and Communists, and their ties with the Congress stayed unsure.
- It left workers' demands out, fearing this would drive industrialists away and split the anti-British front.
Example 5: From Chauri Chaura to Purna Swaraj · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Trace the developments in Indian politics from the withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement in 1922 to the Lahore Congress of 1929. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- February 1922: Gandhiji withdrew Non-Cooperation because it was turning violent (Chauri Chaura) and satyagrahis needed training.
- C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru formed the Swaraj Party to return to council politics. Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose pressed for mass agitation and full independence.
- Depression: agricultural prices fell from 1926 and collapsed after 1930, so peasants could not sell crops or pay revenue.
- The Simon Commission, with no Indian member, was met with 'Go back Simon' in 1928 by all parties. Irwin's vague offer of dominion status and a Round Table Conference in October 1929 did not satisfy the Congress.
- December 1929: the Lahore Congress under Nehru demanded Purna Swaraj and fixed 26 January 1930 as Independence Day.
Answer: - In February 1922 Gandhiji withdrew Non-Cooperation because it was turning violent and satyagrahis needed training.
- C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru formed the Swaraj Party for council politics, while Nehru and Bose demanded radical agitation and full independence.
- The Depression made prices fall from 1926, leaving peasants unable to pay revenue.
- The all-British Simon Commission faced 'Go back Simon' protests by all parties in 1928. Irwin's vague dominion-status offer in 1929 failed to satisfy the Congress.
- In December 1929 the Lahore Congress, under Nehru, demanded Purna Swaraj and declared 26 January 1930 Independence Day.
Example 6: How effective were Gandhiji's Civil Disobedience strategies? · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies used by Gandhiji to launch and lead the Civil Disobedience Movement. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Eleven demands sent to Irwin on 31 January 1930 were wide-ranging, so every class, from industrialists to peasants, could identify with them.
- Salt was used by rich and poor alike. The salt tax and the government monopoly showed British rule at its most oppressive, which made salt a uniting symbol.
- The ultimatum (11 March) and the 24-day march of 78 volunteers drew thousands, and Gandhiji explained swaraj along the way.
- Effect: breaking the law at Dandi spread mass law-breaking: salt making, boycott, refusal of revenue and chaukidari taxes, and forest-law violations.
- Limits: brutal repression (about 100,000 arrested), the pact, the failed Round Table Conference, loss of momentum by 1934, and limited dalit and Muslim participation.
Answer: - Gandhiji's eleven demands were wide-ranging, so all classes could identify with them.
- Salt, used by rich and poor alike, turned the abstract idea of freedom into an everyday grievance.
- The ultimatum and the 240-mile march drew thousands and spread his message of peaceful defiance.
- After Dandi, people across India broke the salt law, boycotted foreign cloth, refused revenue and broke forest laws.
- But repression was brutal, the Round Table talks failed, and the movement lost momentum by 1934. Dalits and many Muslims stayed away.
Verdict: the strategies mobilised the masses well but could not unite every group or win lasting gains.
Example 7: Find and correct the errors · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
A student wrote: 'The Khilafat Committee was formed in Calcutta in March 1919. The Non-Cooperation programme was finally adopted at the Lahore session in December 1920. Later, Indians opposed the Simon Commission because it had only two Indian members.' Identify the three errors and correct them. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Error 1: the Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay, not Calcutta, in March 1919.
- Error 2: the Non-Cooperation programme was adopted at the Nagpur session in December 1920. Lahore (December 1929) was where Purna Swaraj was demanded.
- Error 3: the Simon Commission did not have a single Indian member. All its members were British.
Answer: - The Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay in March 1919.
- The Non-Cooperation programme was adopted at the Nagpur session in December 1920. Lahore 1929 demanded Purna Swaraj.
- The Simon Commission had no Indian member. Every member was British.
Example 8: Did women's position change radically? · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
A student claims: 'Because women joined the Civil Disobedience Movement in large numbers, their position in society and in the Congress changed completely.' Evaluate this claim. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Part that is true: thousands of women came out of their homes, joined marches, made salt, picketed cloth and liquor shops, and went to jail. They saw service to the nation as a sacred duty.
- Part that is false: Gandhiji still believed women's duty was to look after home and hearth and be good mothers and wives.
- The Congress was reluctant for a long time to give women positions of authority and valued only their symbolic presence. Judgement: the claim is only partly correct.
Answer: The claim is only partly true. Women joined in large numbers: they marched, made salt, picketed and went to jail. But Gandhiji still saw their main duty as home and family. For a long time the Congress kept them out of positions of authority and wanted only their symbolic presence. Their public role grew, but how society saw them did not change radically.
Example 9: Which front of Non-Cooperation hit harder? · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Compare the impact of the Non-Cooperation Movement on the economic front with its impact on British institutions such as schools, courts and councils. Which front proved more effective, and why? (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Economic front: foreign goods were refused, liquor shops picketed and foreign cloth burnt. Foreign cloth imports roughly halved, from Rs 102 crore in 1921 to Rs 57 crore in 1922. (1)
- Many merchants refused to trade in or finance foreign goods, and Indian mills and handlooms raised output, so British trade was hurt directly. (1)
- Institutional front: students left government schools and colleges, teachers resigned, lawyers left the courts, and council elections were boycotted in most provinces, though not in Madras. (1)
- Weakness: Indian alternatives to British institutions came up slowly, so students, teachers and lawyers drifted back. Even the cloth boycott weakened because khadi cost more than mill cloth. (1)
- Judgement: the economic front was more effective, because it produced a measurable fall in imports and a gain for Indian producers, while the institutional boycott faded for lack of substitutes. (1)
Answer: - Economic front: foreign goods were refused and foreign cloth burnt; imports roughly halved, from Rs 102 crore (1921) to Rs 57 crore (1922).
- Merchants stopped dealing in foreign goods and Indian mills and handlooms produced more, directly hurting British trade.
- Institutional front: students left government schools, teachers resigned, lawyers left courts and most provinces boycotted council elections.
- But Indian substitutes came up slowly, so many returned; costly khadi also weakened the cloth boycott over time.
Verdict: the economic front was more effective, as it caused a clear fall in imports, while the institutional boycott faded for want of alternatives.
Example 10: Business groups: support, then doubt · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Explain why Indian business groups first supported the Civil Disobedience Movement and why they later lost enthusiasm. What does this show about the difficulty the Congress faced in keeping different classes together? (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Background: merchants and industrialists had made huge profits in the First World War and wanted to expand, so they resented colonial policies that restricted business. (1)
- Demands and organisation: protection against foreign imports and a rupee-sterling exchange ratio that discouraged imports. They formed the Indian Industrial and Commercial Congress (1920) and FICCI (1927), led by Purshottamdas Thakurdas and G.D. Birla. (1)
- Support: they gave financial help and refused to buy or sell imported goods. For them swaraj meant an end to colonial restrictions on trade and industry. (1)
- Doubt: after the Round Table Conference failed, they feared the spread of militant activities, long disruption of business and the growing influence of socialism among young Congress members. (1)
- Lesson: the Congress kept workers' demands out to avoid alienating industrialists, yet business support still wavered. Satisfying one group risked losing another, so unity kept breaking down. (1)
Answer: - Enriched during the First World War, business groups resented colonial limits on expansion.
- They wanted protection from imports and a rupee-sterling ratio that discouraged imports, and organised through the Indian Industrial and Commercial Congress (1920) and FICCI (1927).
- They funded the movement and refused imported goods, seeing swaraj as freedom from business restrictions.
- After the Round Table Conference failed, they feared militancy, long disruption and socialism among young Congress members.
- The Congress had kept workers' demands out to please industrialists, yet still could not hold them. Balancing classes meant unity often broke down.
Example 11: Was salt the right symbol? · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
A good protest symbol should pass three tests: (i) it touches people of every class, (ii) it exposes an injustice clearly, and (iii) ordinary people can act on it themselves. Judge whether Gandhiji's choice of salt in 1930 passed each test. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Test (i): passed. Salt was eaten by rich and poor alike and was one of the most essential items of food. (1)
- Test (ii): passed. Gandhiji said the salt tax and the government monopoly over salt production showed the most oppressive face of British rule. (1)
- Test (iii): passed. Anyone could make salt; after Dandi, thousands broke the salt law, made salt and demonstrated outside government salt factories. (1)
Answer: - Every class used salt, an essential food, so all felt the tax.
- The tax and the state monopoly exposed British rule at its most oppressive.
- Anyone could break the law by making salt, and thousands did.
Verdict: salt passed all three tests, turning the abstract aim of Purna Swaraj into action people could take.
Example 12: Non-Cooperation and Quit India compared · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Compare the Non-Cooperation Movement (1921-22) and the Quit India Movement (1942) on their demand, participation and how each came to an end. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Demand: Non-Cooperation supported Khilafat and swaraj by refusing cooperation. Quit India demanded the complete withdrawal of the British and the immediate transfer of power. (1)
- Participation: Non-Cooperation began with the urban middle class and spread to peasants, tribals and plantation workers, each with its own idea of swaraj. Quit India was a mass movement of students, workers and peasants, with leaders like Jayprakash Narayan and women like Matangini Hazra. (1)
- End: Gandhiji withdrew Non-Cooperation in February 1922 after Chauri Chaura. Quit India was suppressed by British force, which took more than a year. (1)
Answer: - Demand: Non-Cooperation backed Khilafat and swaraj by refusing cooperation; Quit India demanded immediate British withdrawal.
- Participation: Non-Cooperation began with the urban middle class and spread to peasants, tribals and plantation workers; Quit India was a mass movement of students, workers and peasants.
- End: Gandhiji withdrew Non-Cooperation after Chauri Chaura (1922); the British needed over a year to crush Quit India.
Example 13: Kheda and Bardoli compared · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Compare the Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 with the Bardoli Satyagraha of 1928. Give one similarity and two differences. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Similarity: both were peasant satyagrahas in Gujarat over land revenue. (1)
- Difference in leadership: Gandhiji organised the Kheda satyagraha; Vallabhbhai Patel led Bardoli. (1)
- Difference in cause and impact: Kheda peasants could not pay after crop failure and plague and asked for collection to be relaxed; Bardoli peasants opposed an increase in revenue, and their struggle was widely publicised and won sympathy across India. (1)
Answer: - Similarity: both were Gujarat peasant satyagrahas about land revenue.
- Leader: Gandhiji at Kheda; Vallabhbhai Patel at Bardoli.
- Cause and impact: Kheda peasants, hit by crop failure and plague, sought relaxed collection; Bardoli peasants resisted a revenue increase, and their successful struggle won sympathy across India.
Example 14: Source: Nehru at Rae Bareli · 4 marks · Case-basedHOTS / competency
Read the source and answer the questions.
On 6 January 1921, police in the United Provinces opened fire on peasants near Rae Bareli. Jawaharlal Nehru tried to reach the spot, but the police stopped him. Angry, he spoke to the peasants who had gathered around him. Writing about it later, he admitted that for a moment his temper rose and he nearly forgot non-violence. Then he remembered Gandhiji and noticed that the peasants beside him were calmer than he was. His anger passed. He spoke humbly to them about non-violence, feeling that he needed the lesson more than they did. The peasants listened and went home peacefully. A few months earlier, Nehru had helped set up the Oudh Kisan Sabha, which had over 300 village branches within a month.
(i) What made Nehru angry on this day? (1)
(ii) What helped him overcome his anger? (1)
(iii) Using the chapter, explain what this episode shows about the Congress's relationship with the Awadh peasant movement. (2)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (i) The police fired on peasants near Rae Bareli on 6 January 1921 and stopped him from going to the spot. (1)
- (ii) The thought of Gandhiji, and the calmness of the peasants around him. (1)
- (iii) The Congress tried to bring the Awadh peasants into Non-Cooperation under non-violent discipline, through Nehru's village tours and the Oudh Kisan Sabha. (1)
- (iii) But elsewhere in 1921 peasants attacked talukdars' houses, looted bazaars and seized grain in Gandhiji's name, forms the Congress disliked; so keeping peasant anger non-violent was a constant struggle. (1)
Answer: (i) Police firing on peasants near Rae Bareli, and being stopped from reaching the spot.
(ii) Remembering Gandhiji and seeing the peasants' calm.
(iii) The Congress tried to bring the Awadh peasants into Non-Cooperation and keep them non-violent, through Nehru's tours and the Oudh Kisan Sabha. But in 1921 some peasants attacked talukdars' houses, looted bazaars and seized grain in Gandhiji's name, which the Congress leadership was unhappy with.
Case-study practice (Section E style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 4-mark question split into 1 + 1 + 2 marks.
Swaraj in the Gudem Hills
Read the source and answer the questions.
In the early 1920s, the hill people of the Gudem Hills in Andhra Pradesh were angry. The colonial government had closed large areas of forest, so they could no longer graze their cattle or gather fuelwood and fruit there. They felt their traditional rights were being taken away. When officials also forced them to give unpaid labour for building roads, they rose in revolt. Their leader, Alluri Sitaram Raju, was believed to have special powers, and his followers called him an incarnation of God. Raju praised Mahatma Gandhi, asked people to wear khadi and give up drinking, yet insisted that India could be freed only by force. The rebels attacked police stations and fought a guerrilla war until Raju was captured and executed in 1924.
(i) · 1 mark
Which forest policy of the colonial government angered the hill people?
Answer
Answer: The government closed large forest areas, so people could not graze cattle or collect fuelwood and fruits.
The passage links their anger to the forest closures, which hit both their livelihood and their traditional rights.
(ii) · 1 mark
Give one way in which Raju was influenced by the Non-Cooperation Movement.
Answer
Answer: He persuaded people to wear khadi and give up drinking, and spoke of Gandhiji's greatness.
Khadi and giving up liquor were part of the Gandhian programme, so these show the influence.
(iii) · 2 marks
Why could the Congress not approve this movement, even though the rebels linked it to the national struggle?
Answer
Answer: The Congress stood for non-violence, but Raju said India could be freed only by force, and the rebels attacked police stations, tried to kill British officials and fought a guerrilla war. Yet by invoking Gandhiji they felt part of an all-India movement beyond their locality.
One mark for the clash with non-violence, with an example of the violent methods. One mark for showing that the rebels still identified with the wider movement.
A hurried law and a closed ground
Read the source and answer the questions.
In 1919 a new law was hurried through the Imperial Legislative Council, although every Indian member opposed it. It let the government crush political activity and hold political prisoners for two years without trial. Gandhiji called for a peaceful hartal on 6 April. In many cities people held rallies, railway workshop workers went on strike and shops stayed shut. The British feared that railway and telegraph links would be cut. They arrested local leaders in Amritsar and stopped Gandhiji from entering Delhi. On 13 April a crowd gathered in an enclosed ground in Amritsar. Some had come to protest; others were villagers visiting the Baisakhi fair, and many of them did not know that martial law was in force. General Dyer closed the exits and opened fire, killing hundreds.
(i) · 1 mark
Name the law described in the source.
Answer
Answer: The Rowlatt Act (1919).
Detention of political prisoners without trial for two years identifies the Rowlatt Act.
(ii) · 1 mark
Why were many villagers in the crowd unaware of the danger they faced?
Answer
Answer: They had come from outside the city for the Baisakhi fair and did not know that martial law had been imposed.
The inference comes from the passage: being visitors, they had not heard of the martial law.
(iii) · 2 marks
Dyer later said he wanted to 'produce a moral effect'. Explain what he meant, and why the British response after the firing failed to achieve this aim.
Answer
Answer: He wanted to fill the minds of satyagrahis with terror and awe so they would stop protesting. Instead, as the news spread, crowds took to the streets in many north Indian towns with strikes, clashes and attacks on government buildings, even though the government used crawling orders, flogging and bombing to humiliate people.
One mark for explaining the aim of terror and awe. One mark for showing that repression produced wider protest rather than fear.
The Independence Day Pledge
Read the source and answer the questions.
In December 1929 the Congress met at Lahore under the presidency of Jawaharlal Nehru and formally demanded Purna Swaraj. It declared that 26 January 1930 would be celebrated as Independence Day, when people would take a pledge. The pledge said that the Indian people, like every other people, had a natural right to freedom, to enjoy what they earned by their own labour and to have the basic needs of life. It added that if any government took these rights away and oppressed its people, they had a further right to change it or end it. The pledge accused British rule of exploiting the masses and ruining India economically, politically, culturally and spiritually. It concluded that India must cut its connection with Britain.
(i) · 1 mark
What demand did the Lahore Congress formalise?
Answer
Answer: Purna Swaraj, or complete independence for India.
The passage states this directly.
(ii) · 1 mark
According to the pledge, when do people gain the right to change or abolish a government?
Answer
Answer: When the government deprives them of their rights, such as freedom and the necessities of life, and oppresses them.
Read the condition in the pledge: denial of rights plus oppression.
(iii) · 2 marks
The Independence Day celebrations of 1930 attracted very little attention. Explain why, and how Gandhiji tried to solve this problem.
Answer
Answer: Purna Swaraj was an abstract idea that felt far from people's daily lives. Gandhiji linked it to a concrete everyday issue: he chose salt, used by rich and poor alike, sent eleven demands to Irwin and began the Salt March to Dandi.
One mark for the abstract nature of the idea. One mark for the choice of salt and the march as a concrete link.
A different path to freedom
Read the source and answer the questions.
Not every nationalist believed that non-violence could defeat the British. In 1928 a group met at Ferozeshah Kotla ground in Delhi and founded the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army. Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and Ajoy Ghosh were among its leaders. The group carried out dramatic actions aimed at symbols of British power in different parts of India. In April 1929, Bhagat Singh and Batukeswar Dutta hurled a bomb inside the Legislative Assembly, and later that year someone tried to blow up the train that Lord Irwin was on. Bhagat Singh was only 23 when the colonial government tried and executed him. At his trial he explained that he was not trying to glorify violence. What he wanted was a revolution that would change society, and he called the labourer the true support of society.
(i) · 1 mark
Why would the HSRA choose targets such as the Legislative Assembly and the Viceroy's train?
Answer
Answer: They were symbols of British power, so attacking them openly challenged British authority.
The passage says the HSRA targeted symbols of British power; the Assembly and the Viceroy represented that power.
(ii) · 1 mark
Which idea in the source shows that Bhagat Singh's aim went beyond ending British rule?
Answer
Answer: He wanted a revolution that would change society, in which the labourer was valued as the true support of society.
His aim was social change, not just political freedom.
(iii) · 2 marks
Compare the HSRA's view of how freedom could be won with Gandhiji's idea of satyagraha.
Answer
Answer: The HSRA believed the struggle could not be won through non-violence and used dramatic actions against British power. Gandhiji's satyagraha held that a just cause needed no physical force; it relied on truth and non-violence to appeal to the conscience of the oppressor.
One mark for the HSRA view with an example of its method. One mark for the satyagraha view of truth, non-violence and appeal to conscience.
Iqbal on separate electorates, 1930
Read the source and answer the questions.
In 1930 Sir Muhammad Iqbal, speaking as president of the Muslim League, again stressed that separate electorates were an important safeguard for the political interests of Muslims as a minority. He said Indian Muslims would give everything for India's freedom if their right to develop freely according to their own culture and tradition was accepted. He insisted that this was not narrow communalism and said he respected the customs and religions of other communities. He argued that the units of Indian society were communal groups, not territorial units as in Europe, so European democracy could not be applied to India without recognising these groups. He also pointed to the weaker economic position and heavy debts of Muslims to explain their anxiety. His statement is believed to have given intellectual support to the Pakistan demand that came later.
(i) · 1 mark
What safeguard did Iqbal want for Muslims?
Answer
Answer: Separate electorates.
The passage names separate electorates as the safeguard for minority political interests.
(ii) · 1 mark
Why did Iqbal argue that European democracy could not be applied to India unchanged?
Answer
Answer: Because Indian society was made up of communal groups rather than territorial units as in Europe, so these groups had to be recognised.
Pick out his contrast between communal units in India and territorial units in Europe.
(iii) · 2 marks
Using the chapter, explain why many Muslims responded coolly to the Civil Disobedience Movement, and how Iqbal's speech reflects this mood.
Answer
Answer: After the Khilafat movement declined, many Muslims felt alienated as the Congress seemed close to the Hindu Mahasabha, riots spread and the 1928 unity talks failed over representation. Iqbal's insistence on separate electorates reflects their fear that minority culture and identity would be submerged under a Hindu majority.
One mark for the reasons for alienation from the chapter. One mark for linking the speech to the fear of majority domination.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
State any two outcomes of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact of 5 March 1931. (2 marks) (2 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Gandhiji agreed to take part in a Round Table Conference in London. The Congress had boycotted the first one. | 1 |
| The government agreed to release the political prisoners. | 1 |
Describe the Jallianwala Bagh incident of 13 April 1919 and its aftermath. (3 marks) (3 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| A large crowd gathered in the enclosed ground of Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar. Some came to protest against the new repressive measures, others came for the Baisakhi fair. Many villagers did not know that martial law had been imposed. | 1 |
| General Dyer blocked the exit points and opened fire, killing hundreds. His aim was to 'produce a moral effect', meaning terror and awe in the minds of satyagrahis. | 1 |
| Aftermath: crowds took to the streets in north Indian towns, with strikes and clashes. The government used brutal repression (crawling orders, flogging, villages around Gujranwala bombed). As violence spread, Gandhiji called off the movement. | 1 |
'Different social groups joined the Civil Disobedience Movement with their own idea of swaraj.' Explain with reference to any five groups. (5 marks) (5 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Rich peasants (Patidars of Gujarat, Jats of Uttar Pradesh): hit by the depression and falling prices, they could not pay revenue. Swaraj meant a fight against high revenue. | 1 |
| Poor peasants: small tenants who could not pay rent wanted unpaid rent remitted. They joined radical movements led by Socialists and Communists. | 1 |
| Business classes: wanted protection against foreign imports and a rupee-sterling ratio that discouraged imports. Swaraj meant an end to colonial restrictions on business. They gave money and refused to buy or sell imported goods. | 1 |
| Industrial workers: mostly stayed aloof except in the Nagpur region. Some adopted boycott as part of their fight against low wages and poor conditions, for example railway strikes in 1930, dockworkers in 1932 and the Chotanagpur tin miners. | 1 |
| Women: joined in large numbers. They marched, made salt, picketed foreign cloth and liquor shops and went to jail, seeing service to the nation as a sacred duty. | 1 |
Where students lose marks in Nationalism in India
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Swapping the Calcutta and Nagpur sessions
Both are in 1920 and both are about Non-Cooperation, so students blur them.
Wrong working
The Non-Cooperation programme was adopted at the Calcutta session of September 1920.
Right working
At Calcutta (September 1920), Gandhiji convinced leaders to start Non-Cooperation. The programme was adopted at Nagpur (December 1920) after a compromise.
Do this: Learn each session as a pair: place, month and what happened. Use the 'C before N' trick.
Usually costs: 1 mark in an MCQ or map item, and the accuracy point in a 3-mark answer.
Mistake: Treating Civil Disobedience as a repeat of Non-Cooperation
Both used boycotts and picketing, so students miss the new element.
Wrong working
In the Civil Disobedience Movement, people again boycotted foreign goods and refused to cooperate with the British.
Right working
In Civil Disobedience, people were asked not only to refuse cooperation but also to break colonial laws, for example by making salt and entering Reserved Forests.
Do this: Always open a comparison with 'refuse vs break', then add aim and ending.
Usually costs: 1 to 2 marks in a 3-mark comparison.
Mistake: Saying the Poona Pact gave dalits separate electorates
Ambedkar demanded separate electorates, so students assume he got them.
Wrong working
Under the Poona Pact, dalits got separate electorates.
Right working
The Poona Pact (September 1932) gave the Depressed Classes reserved seats in provincial and central councils, but they were elected by the general electorate.
Do this: Remember the sequence: demand (separate electorate), then Gandhiji's fast, then compromise (reserved seats with a general electorate).
Usually costs: 1 mark in an MCQ and 1 to 2 marks in a 5-mark limits answer.
Mistake: Mixing up the Dandi March numbers
Three numbers (78, 240, 24) appear close together.
Wrong working
Gandhiji walked 78 miles with 240 volunteers to Dandi.
Right working
Gandhiji walked over 240 miles from Sabarmati to Dandi with 78 volunteers, taking 24 days, and made salt on 6 April.
Do this: Use the 78-240-24-6 trick and say the units aloud: people, miles, days, date.
Usually costs: 1 mark in an MCQ, half to 1 mark in a descriptive answer.
Mistake: Saying Alluri Sitaram Raju followed non-violence
He praised Gandhiji and promoted khadi, so students assume he was a satyagrahi.
Wrong working
Alluri Sitaram Raju led the Gudem tribals in a non-violent satyagraha.
Right working
Raju was inspired by Non-Cooperation and persuaded people to wear khadi, but he said India could be freed only by force. He led guerrilla warfare, which the Congress could not approve.
Do this: Note the contrast in one line: admired Gandhiji, rejected non-violence.
Usually costs: 1 mark in an MCQ or the value point in a 3-mark answer.
Mistake: Writing a story instead of value points in long answers
Students narrate events in order and run past the word limit without clear points.
Wrong working
A 200-word paragraph telling the Jallianwala Bagh story with emotion but only two clear facts.
Right working
Five short points: Rowlatt Act provisions, hartal of 6 April, arrests and martial law, firing on 13 April, repression and withdrawal. Within 120 words.
Do this: Plan five points before writing. Start each with a key word (cause, event, response, result).
Usually costs: 1 to 2 marks in a 5-mark question.
NCERT exercise guide: Nationalism in India
What each exercise in the NCERT chapter tests, how to approach it, and a question of the same kind solved step by step. Questions here are written in our own words.
Activity (in-text role-play and imagination tasks)
What it tests: Putting yourself in the place of a person from the 1920s or 1930s, such as a student, peasant or worker. You explain how that person would react to the national movement and why.
How to approach it: First name the group and its main grievance from the chapter. Then link that grievance to the call of the movement. End with how that person imagined swaraj. Write in the first person if asked, but every point must still be a fact from the chapter.
Mirrors the role-play activities that ask you to imagine being a person in the 1920s
Imagine you are a tea-garden worker in Assam in 1921. Explain how you would respond to news of the Non-Cooperation Movement and why. (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- State the grievance: under the Inland Emigration Act of 1859, workers could not leave the tea gardens without permission, which was rarely given.
- State what swaraj means to you: the right to move freely out of the confined space and keep a link with your home village.
- State the response: like thousands of others, you would defy the authorities, leave the plantation and head home, believing Gandhi Raj would give everyone land in their villages.
- Add the result: workers were stranded by a railway and steamer strike, caught by the police and beaten.
Answer: I cannot leave this tea garden without permission under the Inland Emigration Act of 1859, and permission is almost never given. For me, swaraj means freedom to move in and out and to stay linked with my village. When I hear of Non-Cooperation, I will defy the managers and walk home, hoping Gandhi Raj will give us land. Sadly, many of us were stranded by a railway and steamer strike and beaten by the police.
Source boxes (unnumbered extracts in the chapter)
What it tests: Reading an extract, such as Gandhiji on satyagraha, Nehru at Rae Bareli, the Independence Day Pledge or Iqbal's speech, and explaining its idea in your own words.
How to approach it: Read the extract twice and underline the one idea the question points to. Explain that idea in simple words, then connect it to an event in the chapter. Do not copy long lines from the source: examiners give marks for explanation, not for repetition.
Mirrors questions on the source 'Mahatma Gandhi on Satyagraha'
In his writing on satyagraha, Gandhiji argues that India cannot match Britain in force of arms. How does this argument support his choice of non-violence as the method of struggle? (2 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Explain the comparison: Britain could arm its people, but the hundreds of millions in India could never carry arms.
- Draw the conclusion: so Indians had to use a different strength, soul-force or truth, which appeals to the oppressor's conscience instead of using violence.
Answer: Gandhiji says Britain could arm its people, but the millions in India could never carry arms. A violent fight would favour Britain. Non-violence lets Indians use their own strength, soul-force, and appeal to the oppressor's conscience.
Discuss (in-text and end-of-chapter)
What it tests: Questions that ask you to weigh different views: why groups joined the movement, why leaders disagreed over separate electorates, and whether symbols appealed to everyone.
How to approach it: Present both sides fairly, each with a reason from the chapter. Then give a short judgement. Use the words 'because' and 'therefore' so the examiner can see your reasoning.
Mirrors the Discuss questions on why leaders differed over separate electorates
Why did Dr B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhiji clash at the second Round Table Conference, and how was the clash resolved? (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Ambedkar's view: he demanded separate electorates for dalits, believing political empowerment would solve their social disabilities.
- Gandhiji's view: when the British conceded the demand, he began a fast unto death, believing separate electorates would slow down dalits' integration into society.
- Resolution: Ambedkar accepted Gandhiji's position and the Poona Pact of September 1932 gave the Depressed Classes reserved seats, to be voted in by the general electorate.
Answer: Ambedkar demanded separate electorates for dalits, believing political power would end their social disabilities. Gandhiji felt this would slow their integration into society, and began a fast unto death when the British accepted the demand. Ambedkar gave way. The Poona Pact of September 1932 gave the Depressed Classes reserved seats in the legislative councils, elected by the general electorate.
Write in brief (end-of-chapter exercises)
What it tests: Explaining causes and events, the meaning of satyagraha, writing newspaper reports on key events, and comparing national symbols.
How to approach it: For 'explain' questions, give separate value points, each with a fact and a reason. For a newspaper report, add a headline, a place and date line, and then what happened, why, and the reaction, using only facts from the chapter. Keep within the word limit for the marks.
Mirrors the newspaper-report tasks
Write a short newspaper report on Gandhiji reaching Dandi at the end of the Salt March. (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Headline with place and date: Dandi, 6 April 1930.
- Background: the 11 March deadline for the eleven demands, including abolition of the salt tax, passed and Irwin refused to negotiate.
- The march: 78 volunteers walked over 240 miles from Sabarmati in 24 days, and thousands gathered to hear Gandhiji on the way.
- The event and its meaning: Gandhiji made salt by boiling sea water, breaking the law and beginning the Civil Disobedience Movement.
Answer: Salt Law Broken at Dandi (Dandi, 6 April 1930). Viceroy Irwin ignored Gandhiji's eleven demands, so Gandhiji set out from Sabarmati with 78 volunteers. They walked over 240 miles in 24 days, and thousands gathered to hear him. Today he made salt by boiling sea water, openly breaking the salt law. This marks the start of the Civil Disobedience Movement.
Project (unnumbered)
What it tests: Longer tasks that ask you to research, compare and organise events of the national movement.
How to approach it: Choose a clear format, such as a timeline, chart or comparison. Use only dates and facts given in the chapter, then add one or two lines showing how one event led to the next. Linking events is what turns a list into history.
Mirrors project tasks that ask you to organise the national movement in order
Prepare a timeline of the national movement from 1919 to 1932 using the chapter, and explain one link between two events on it.
Show the solutionSolution
- April 1919: hartal against the Rowlatt Act; Jallianwala Bagh massacre.
- January 1921: Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement launched. February 1922: Chauri Chaura, and the movement is withdrawn.
- December 1929: the Lahore Congress demands Purna Swaraj. March 1930: the Salt March begins from Sabarmati. April 1930 (6 April): Gandhiji breaks the salt law at Dandi.
- March 1931: Gandhi-Irwin Pact. December 1931: second Round Table Conference. 1932: Civil Disobedience relaunched; Poona Pact in September.
- Link: the Purna Swaraj celebrations of 26 January 1930 drew little attention, so Gandhiji used salt to tie freedom to daily life. This led to the Dandi March.
Answer: The timeline runs from Rowlatt and Jallianwala Bagh (1919), through Non-Cooperation (1921-22), the Lahore Congress (1929), the start of the Salt March (March 1930) and the breaking of the salt law at Dandi (6 April 1930), to the Pact, the Conference and the relaunch (1931-32). Link: the Lahore demand for Purna Swaraj was too abstract to stir people, so Gandhiji chose salt, a daily need of rich and poor. That choice led directly to the Salt March.
Nationalism in India: previous year questions
- Asked in 21 of the 21 board papers we hold (2023 to 2026), on average 9.4 marks per paper; 80 questions in all, counting OR alternatives. In 4 of 4 sample papers.
Counted from the real papers on our previous year papers page, not estimated. Average marks are over every board paper we hold, with an OR pair counted once. Chapter tags are ours.
Solved board questions from Nationalism in India
Real questions from recent papers. Try each one first, then open our step-by-step solution with marks per step.
2026, set 32/1/1, Q1 · 1 mark · MCQ
Arrange the following in chronological order and choose the correct option:
I. Gandhi-Irwin Pact
II. Rowlatt Act
III. Poona Pact
IV. Khilafat Movement
- (A)I, III, IV and II
- (B)II, IV, III and I
- (C)II, IV, I and III
- (D)I, III, II and IV
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
Rowlatt Act (1919) came first, then the Khilafat Movement (1919-20). The Gandhi-Irwin Pact was signed in 1931, and the Poona Pact in 1932. Order: II, IV, I, III.
Answer: Option (C): II, IV, I and III
Where the marks are
- Correct order II, IV, I, III (1 mark)
2026, set 32/1/1, Q8 · 4 marks · Case-basedCompetency-based
Read the given source carefully and answer the questions that follow:
'To the altar of this revolution we have brought our youth as incense'
Many nationalists thought that the struggle against the British could not be won through non-violence. In the year 1928, the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA) was founded at a meeting in Ferozeshah Kotla ground in Delhi. Amongst its leaders were Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and Ajoy Ghosh. In a series of dramatic actions in different parts of India, the HSRA targeted some of the symbols of British power. In April 1929, Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutta threw a bomb in the Legislative Assembly. In the same year there was an attempt to blow up the train that Lord Irwin was travelling in. Bhagat Singh was 23 when he was tried and executed by the colonial government. During his trial, Bhagat Singh stated that he did not wish to glorify 'the cult of the bomb and pistol' but wanted a revolution in society –
'Revolution is the inalienable right of mankind. Freedom is the imprescriptible birthright of all. The labourer is the real sustainer of society. To the altar of this revolution we have brought our youth as incense, for no sacrifice is too great for so magnificent a cause. We are content. We await the advent of revolution. Inquilab Zindabad!'
- 8.11 mark
Why is the formation of 'Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA)' considered as a turning point in the freedom struggle of India?
- 8.21 mark
How did Bhagat Singh's trial speeches transform him from a revolutionary to a philosopher of freedom?
- 8.32 marks
In what way did Bhagat Singh redefine the meaning of 'revolution' for his generation? Explain.
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
(i) Many nationalists felt the British could not be defeated through non-violence. The HSRA brought a new generation of young revolutionaries and spread nationalist spirit.
- 1 mark
(ii) In his trial speeches Bhagat Singh rejected the glorification of 'the cult of the bomb and pistol'. He spoke of freedom, justice and social equality, and these ideas made him a philosopher of freedom.
- 1 mark
(iii) He called revolution the inalienable right of mankind and freedom the imprescriptible birthright of all.
- 1 mark
He saw revolution as a change in society, in which the labourer is the real sustainer, and he asked youth to sacrifice for the cause. His slogan 'Inquilab Zindabad' raised the spirit of freedom.
Answer: (i) It brought young revolutionary leadership; (ii) he spoke of freedom, justice and social change, not violence; (iii) he made revolution a right of mankind and a social change, backed by youth sacrifice.
Where the marks are
- 8.1 any one valid point (1 mark)
- 8.2 any one valid point (1 mark)
- 8.3 revolution as an inalienable right (1 mark)
- 8.3 social transformation, youth sacrifice, Inquilab Zindabad (1 mark)
2026, set 32/1/1, Q9 · 2 marks · Map work
Answer the following.
- (A)1 mark
Two places (A) and (B) have been marked on the given political outline map of India. Identify them based on the information given below and write their correct names on the lines marked on the map near them:
(A) The place where General Dyer ordered firing upon a peaceful gathering on 13 April, 1919. - (B)1 mark
(B) The place where the Session of Indian National Congress was held in the year 1927.
Figure in the paper: Political outline map of India (map for Q.9 and Q.19) with two marked points: A in the north-west (Punjab region, near Amritsar area) with a leader line, and B on the east coast of peninsular India (Andhra Pradesh/Tamil Nadu border region, near Tamil Nadu coast) with a leader line, for naming. See it in the official paper.
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
(A) Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar (Punjab), where General Dyer ordered firing on 13 April 1919.
- 1 mark
(B) Madras (Chennai), where the 1927 Congress session was held.
Answer: (A) Amritsar (Jallianwala Bagh); (B) Madras (Chennai)
Where the marks are
- A correctly named (1 mark)
- B correctly named (1 mark)
Every Nationalism in India question, by year
- For 2027
Sample paper 2026-27: Q2 (1 mark, solved), Q7A (5 marks, solved), Q7B (5 marks, solved), Q9 (2 marks, solved)
- 2026
Set 32/1/1: Q1 (1 mark, solved), Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q8 (4 marks, solved), Q9 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q4 (1 mark, solved), Q8(a) (5 marks, solved), Q8(b) (5 marks, solved), Q10 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q4 (1 mark, solved), Q9 (4 marks, solved), Q10 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q1 (1 mark, solved), Q8 (4 marks, solved), Q9 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q1 (1 mark, solved), Q8 (4 marks, solved), Q9 (2 marks, solved)
Sample paper 2025-26: Q2 (1 mark, solved), Q6(A) (3 marks, solved), Q6(B) (3 marks, solved), Q9 (2 marks, solved)
- 2025
Set 32/1/1: Q21(a) (2 marks, solved), Q21(b) (2 marks, solved), Q25 (3 marks, solved), Q34 (4 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q21(a) (2 marks, solved), Q21(b) (2 marks, solved), Q25 (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q19 (1 mark, solved), Q20 (1 mark, solved), Q21 (2 marks, solved), Q25(a) (3 marks, solved), Q25(b) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q30(A) (5 marks, solved), Q30(B) (5 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q21(a) (2 marks, solved), Q21(b) (2 marks, solved), Q25(a) (3 marks, solved), Q25(b) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/6/1: Q8 (1 mark, solved), Q22 (2 marks, solved), Q35 (4 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Sample paper 2024-25: Q1 (1 mark, solved), Q13 (1 mark, solved), Q34 (4 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
- 2024
Set 32/1/1: Q4 (1 mark, solved), Q25(A) (3 marks, solved), Q25(B) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q30(a) (5 marks, solved), Q30(b) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q7 (1 mark, solved), Q30(a) (5 marks, solved), Q30(b) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q25(a) (3 marks, solved), Q25(b) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q25(a) (3 marks, solved), Q25(b) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks)
Sample paper 2023-24: Q1 (1 mark, solved), Q13 (1 mark, solved), Q34 (4 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
- 2023
Set 32/1/1: Q30(a) (5 marks, solved), Q30(b) (5 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q4 (1 mark, solved), Q30(a) (5 marks, solved), Q30(b) (5 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q30(A) (5 marks, solved), Q30(B) (5 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q25(a) (3 marks, solved), Q25(b) (3 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/6/1: Q30(a) (5 marks, solved), Q30(b) (5 marks, solved), Q34 (4 marks, solved), Q37 (5 marks, solved)
Practice questions on Nationalism in India
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
A picture from July 1922 shows people throwing heaps of imported cloth into a fire. Which movement does it relate to?
(a) The Rowlatt satyagraha
(b) The Non-Cooperation Movement
(c) The Quit India Movement
(d) The Kheda satyagrahaHint
Which movement made boycott of foreign goods and bonfires of foreign cloth a main weapon in 1921-22?
Answer
(b) The Non-Cooperation Movement. Foreign cloth was burnt in bonfires as a symbol of Western economic and cultural domination.
Q2 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Gandhiji's Swaraj flag, designed by 1921, had which feature at its centre?
(a) Eight lotuses
(b) A crescent moon
(c) A spinning wheel
(d) A trishulHint
Do not confuse it with the red, green and yellow Swadeshi flag of Bengal.
Answer
(c) A spinning wheel, showing the Gandhian ideal of self-help. The lotuses and crescent moon belonged to the Swadeshi tricolour.
Q3 · 2 marks · Very short answerBoard level
What was the Poona Pact? (2 marks)
Hint
Think of what came after Gandhiji's fast unto death.
Answer
It was the agreement of September 1932 after Ambedkar accepted Gandhiji's position on separate electorates. It gave the Depressed Classes reserved seats in the provincial and central legislative councils, but they were to be elected by the general electorate.
Q4 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
How did the effects of the First World War lead to the Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movements? (3 marks)
Hint
Link economic hardship to the Ottoman defeat, then to the Calcutta session.
Answer
- War costs brought higher taxes, prices doubled between 1913 and 1918, forced recruitment angered villages, and crop failures and influenza followed.
- Turkey's defeat raised fears of a harsh treaty on the Khalifa, and a Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay in 1919.
- Gandhiji used this anger and the Khilafat issue to unite Hindus and Muslims. Non-cooperation was approved at Calcutta (1920) and adopted at Nagpur.
Q5 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonBoard level
Read the statements and choose the correct option.
Assertion (A): Gandhiji withdrew the Non-Cooperation Movement in February 1922.
Reason (R): He felt that the movement was turning violent and satyagrahis needed proper training before mass struggles.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.Hint
Recall what happened at Chauri Chaura.
Answer
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A. After the violent clash at Chauri Chaura, Gandhiji withdrew the movement for exactly this reason.
Q6 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Why did the industrial working classes not join the Civil Disobedience Movement in large numbers, and how did some workers still take part? (3 marks)
Hint
Think about who was coming closer to the Congress.
Answer
- As industrialists came closer to the Congress, workers stayed aloof, except in the Nagpur region. The Congress also kept workers' demands out of its programme.
- Some workers adopted ideas like the boycott of foreign goods in their own fight against low wages and poor conditions.
- Examples: railway strikes (1930), dockworkers (1932), and Chotanagpur tin miners wearing Gandhi caps (1930).
Q7 · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
'History, folklore and symbols helped create a sense of collective belonging in India.' Explain with four examples, and evaluate how far these efforts united all communities. (5 marks)
Hint
Use folklore, flags, the Bharat Mata image and the reinterpretation of history, then judge who felt included and who felt left out.
Answer
- Bharat Mata: Bankim's 'Vande Mataram' and Abanindranath Tagore's painting gave the nation a figure to love and serve.
- Folklore: Rabindranath Tagore collected ballads and myths, and Natesa Sastri published Tamil folk tales, to restore pride in tradition.
- Flags: the Swadeshi tricolour, and Gandhiji's Swaraj flag with a spinning wheel, carried in marches as a sign of defiance.
- History: Indians wrote of ancient achievements to answer British claims that they were backward.
- Evaluation: these built pride and a shared identity for many, but when the glorified past and images were Hindu, other communities felt left out, so the unity was only partial.
Q8 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Describe the main features of the Quit India Movement. (3 marks)
Hint
Cover the cause, the resolution and speech, and who took part.
Answer
- The failure of the Cripps Mission and the effects of World War II caused discontent. The Wardha resolution (14 July 1942), endorsed in Bombay on 8 August, demanded immediate British withdrawal, and Gandhiji gave the 'Do or Die' call.
- It was a mass movement of students, workers and peasants, with hartals and processions.
- Leaders like Jayprakash Narayan and Aruna Asaf Ali, and women like Matangini Hazra, took part. It took the British more than a year to suppress it.
Q9 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Imagine a Patidar farmer of Gujarat in 1932 explaining to a Congress volunteer why he will not join the relaunched Civil Disobedience Movement. Write three reasons he would give, based on the chapter. (3 marks)
Hint
What did swaraj mean to rich peasants, and what did they get in 1931?
Answer
- 'I joined because falling prices in the Depression wiped out my cash income and I could not pay revenue.'
- 'For me, swaraj meant lower revenue.'
- 'But the movement was called off in 1931 without any change in revenue rates, so I feel let down and will not join again.'
Q10 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
The import of foreign cloth fell from Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore between 1921 and 1922. What does this data show about the Non-Cooperation Movement, and why could this effect not last in the towns? (3 marks)
Hint
Read the numbers first (about halved), then think about khadi prices and alternative institutions.
Answer
- The data shows the boycott hit British trade hard: imports nearly halved. Indian mills and handlooms produced more.
- It could not last because khadi often cost more than mill cloth, so poor people could not keep up the boycott.
- Alternative Indian institutions were slow to come up, so students and lawyers drifted back to government schools and courts.
Q11 · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Compare the peasant movement in Awadh with the tribal revolt in the Gudem Hills during the Non-Cooperation Movement, on grievances, leadership, methods and relationship with the Congress. (5 marks)
Hint
Make a point for each heading, then end with what both had in common.
Answer
- Grievances: Awadh peasants faced very high rents, cesses, begar and eviction by talukdars and landlords. Gudem tribals lost forest access for grazing, fuelwood and fruit, and were forced into begar for road building.
- Leadership: Awadh had Baba Ramchandra, with Nehru in the Oudh Kisan Sabha (1920). Gudem had Alluri Sitaram Raju, seen as an incarnation of God.
- Methods: Awadh used social boycott through nai-dhobi bandhs, later attacks on talukdars' houses and looting of bazaars. Gudem rebels fought a guerrilla war and attacked police stations.
- Congress: it tried to fold the Awadh struggle into Non-Cooperation but disliked its violence; it could not approve the Gudem armed struggle.
- Common: both invoked Gandhiji and linked local grievances to an all-India movement.
Q12 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Why did the efforts of the Congress and the Muslim League to forge unity in 1927-28 fail, and how did this affect the Muslim response to the Civil Disobedience Movement? (3 marks)
Hint
Start with the question of representation, then name who blocked compromise.
Answer
- The dispute was over representation. Jinnah offered to drop separate electorates if Muslims got reserved seats in the Central Assembly and population-based seats in Bengal and Punjab.
- Hope ended at the 1928 All Parties Conference when M.R. Jayakar of the Hindu Mahasabha opposed compromise.
- So distrust ran high, and many Muslims, fearing a Hindu majority, stayed away from Civil Disobedience.
Q13 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
'The Rowlatt satyagraha taught Gandhiji lessons that shaped the Non-Cooperation Movement.' Justify the statement. (3 marks)
Hint
Think about where the Rowlatt protest happened and who was missing from it.
Answer
- The Rowlatt satyagraha was widespread but stayed mostly in cities and towns, so Gandhiji wanted a more broad-based movement.
- He felt this needed Hindu-Muslim unity, so he took up the Khilafat issue alongside swaraj.
- Non-Cooperation, planned in stages, then spread from towns to villages, forests and plantations, far beyond the Rowlatt protest.
Q14 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
After 1922 the Congress was divided between the Swaraj Party and younger radicals. Compare their positions and explain how events of 1926 to 1929 strengthened the radicals. (3 marks)
Hint
Name the leaders of each side, then use the Depression, the Simon Commission and Irwin's offer.
Answer
- Swaraj Party (C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru): enter the provincial councils, oppose British policies there and show they were not truly democratic.
- Radicals (Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose): mass agitation and full independence.
- Falling prices from 1926, the all-British Simon Commission and Irwin's vague dominion-status offer weakened moderates; Lahore (1929) demanded Purna Swaraj.
Q15 · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
Explain why the Civil Disobedience Movement had lost momentum by 1934. Link the events after 1930 with the attitudes of rich peasants, business groups and other sections. (5 marks)
Hint
Combine government action, the failed talks and each group's disappointment.
Answer
- Repression: leaders were arrested, peaceful satyagrahis attacked and about 100,000 people arrested; Gandhiji called the movement off with the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 1931).
- The second Round Table Conference (December 1931) failed. On his return the Congress was declared illegal, Nehru and Ghaffar Khan were in jail and meetings were banned.
- Rich peasants felt let down because revenue rates were not revised, so many refused to rejoin in 1932.
- Business groups, worried about militancy, disruption and socialism, were no longer uniformly enthusiastic.
- Workers joined in small numbers, and dalits and many Muslims largely stayed away. Relaunched in 1932, it had faded by 1934.
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.Who led the peasants of Awadh against talukdars and landlords?Show answer
Baba Ramchandra, a sanyasi who had earlier been an indentured labourer in Fiji.
2.What is begar?Show answer
Labour that villagers were forced to give without any payment.
3.What did the Inland Emigration Act of 1859 do?Show answer
It stopped plantation workers from leaving the tea gardens without permission.
4.Why was the Simon Commission opposed in India?Show answer
It did not have a single Indian member. All its members were British.
5.What did the Lahore Congress of December 1929 decide?Show answer
Under Jawaharlal Nehru, it demanded Purna Swaraj and fixed 26 January 1930 as Independence Day.
6.Who formed the Swaraj Party, and why?Show answer
C. R. Das and Motilal Nehru, to return to council politics after Non-Cooperation was withdrawn.
7.What did the Swaraj flag of 1921 look like?Show answer
A tricolour of red, green and white with a spinning wheel in the centre, representing self-help.
8.Who wrote 'Vande Mataram', and in which novel was it included?Show answer
Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, in the 1870s. It was later included in his novel Anandamath.
Best order to study it
- Start with the big idea: Indian nationalism grew from the anti-colonial struggle, and swaraj meant different things to different groups. Read the introduction and the conclusion first.
- Learn Section 1 as a chain: war hardships, satyagraha and its three trials, the Rowlatt Act, Jallianwala Bagh, Khilafat, Calcutta and Nagpur.
- Study Section 2 group by group (towns, Awadh, Gudem, Assam), writing one line on what swaraj meant to each.
- Do Section 3 in two parts: first the road to Dandi and how the movement ran (1922 to 1934), then the groups who joined and the limits (dalits, Muslims).
- Finish with Section 4 (Bharat Mata, folklore, flags, history), then practise all map items and one 5-mark answer from each section.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- Can you list three economic effects of the First World War on India, with the price fact?
- Can you define satyagraha and name its three early movements, with places and years?
- Can you give the sequence from the Rowlatt Act (1919) to the Rowlatt satyagraha being called off?
- Can you explain why Gandhiji took up the Khilafat issue and what Hind Swaraj argued?
- Can you state the stages of Non-Cooperation and which session adopted the programme?
- Can you give the foreign cloth import figures and two reasons the town movement slowed?
- Can you say what swaraj meant to Awadh peasants, Gudem tribals and Assam plantation workers?
- Can you distinguish Non-Cooperation from Civil Disobedience on method, aim and ending?
- Can you explain why rich peasants, business groups and workers joined or held back, and what the Poona Pact gave?
- Can you mark Calcutta, Nagpur, Madras, Champaran, Kheda, Ahmedabad, Jallianwala Bagh and Dandi on an outline map?
Nationalism in India: frequently asked questions
Are the boxes on Bardoli, the HSRA and the Quit India Movement part of the syllabus?
The 2026-27 syllabus lists nothing as excluded from this chapter, so treat these boxes as part of your reading. Source passages can be built from them. The concept on the boxes on this page sets out their key facts: Bardoli in 1928, the HSRA and Bhagat Singh, and the Quit India resolution of 1942.
Which places are on the map list for Nationalism in India?
The official list has the Congress sessions at Calcutta (1920), Nagpur (1920) and Madras (1927), and the satyagrahas at Kheda, Champaran and Ahmedabad (mill workers). It also has Jallianwala Bagh and the Dandi March. Map questions use only these items.
What is the easiest way to remember the difference between Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience?
In Non-Cooperation, people refused to cooperate with British rule. In Civil Disobedience, they also broke colonial laws, such as the salt law. Add that Non-Cooperation ended after Chauri Chaura in 1922, while Civil Disobedience paused with the Gandhi-Irwin Pact in 1931.
Why did Gandhiji withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement?
In February 1922, after the violent clash at Chauri Chaura, he saw that the movement was becoming violent in many places. He also felt that the volunteers were not yet trained for mass action, so he stopped it.
How should I write a 5-mark answer in this chapter?
Plan five separate points, each built on a fact from the NCERT text, such as a group, a date or a figure. If the question has two parts, split your points between them. Keep the whole answer within 120 words.
Based on: CBSE Social Science (087) syllabus 2026-27; NCERT India and the Contemporary World-II (History), Reprint 2026-27