Development Class 10 Economics: Notes and Board Answers
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Development is the first chapter of the Class 10 Economics book. It shows that people have different, even conflicting, development goals, that income is the common measure used to compare countries, and why health, education, public facilities and sustainability also matter. The board asks MCQs, assertion-reason, 3-mark reasoning answers, 5-mark evaluations and table-based questions on states and countries.
What Development is about
This chapter asks a simple question with no simple answer: what does it mean for a person, a state or a country to develop? You first see that different people want different things, and that one person's progress can harm another. Then you learn how countries and states are compared. Income, especially per capita income, is the common yardstick. Health, education, public facilities and the care of natural resources show what income alone misses.
The chapter links to the rest of your course. Sustainability connects with Resources and Development and Water Resources in Geography. The idea that people with conflicting goals must find a fair path links to the democratic process you study in Political Science. Later Economics chapters build on the same thinking about jobs, income and well-being.
Board questions take a few clear shapes. There are MCQs and assertion-reason items on terms and conclusions. There are 3-mark answers that ask you to give reasons. There are 5-mark answers that ask you to evaluate a statement. Many questions give a table on states or countries and ask you to interpret it, so practise reading the data, not just memorising it.
Weightage: Economics carries 20 of the 80 theory marks; this chapter shares them with Sectors of the Indian Economy, Money and Credit and Globalisation and the Indian Economy.Source: CBSE Social Science syllabus 2026-27, Economics
In real board papers: asked in 21 of the 21 board papers we hold (2023 to 2026), on average 5 marks per paper. See the questions
Key concepts
- Different people, different and conflicting development goals
- NCERT section What Development Promises — Different People, Different Goals
Development means getting closer to what you hope for in life. Since people live in very different situations, they hope for different things. A landless rural labourer wants more days of work, better wages, a good local school for their children and an end to social discrimination. A prosperous farmer from Punjab wants higher support prices for crops and cheap labour. A girl from a rich urban family wants the same freedom as her brother.
Goals are not only different. They can be conflicting: when one person gets what they want, another loses. Industrialists may want big dams for electricity. But dams can submerge land and displace people such as tribals, who may prefer small check dams or tanks. The protest against raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam on the Narmada River shows this.
So keep two lessons in mind. People can want quite different things from development. And one group's progress can be another group's loss, sometimes even a serious harm.
Worked example
Show, with two examples from the chapter, how one group's development can harm another group. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- People seek what fulfils their own aspirations, and their life situations differ, so goals can clash. (1 mark)
- Industrialists want more dams for electricity, but dams submerge land and displace people such as tribals, who would prefer small check dams or tanks. (1 mark)
- A girl wants as much freedom as her brother and wants him to share housework; the brother may not like this. (1 mark)
Answer: Goals come from each person's life situation, so they can clash. Industrialists want big dams for more electricity, but dams submerge land and displace tribals, who prefer small check dams or tanks. A girl seeks freedom equal to her brother and wants him to share housework, which he may resent.
- Income and other (non-material) goals
- NCERT section Income and Other Goals
Look at what people want and you find one common wish: more income. Regular work, better wages and a decent price for crops all mean more money. Money matters because it buys the material things life depends on.
But people also want equal treatment, freedom, security and respect. They resent discrimination. These are non-material goals. They are hard to measure, yet sometimes they matter more than income. Think of friendship: you cannot buy it, but it means a lot. Something being hard to count does not make it less valuable.
A job offer shows this. Before taking a far-off job you think about facilities for your family, the working atmosphere and the chance to learn. A lower-paid but regular job may give more security than a high-paid job with no security and no time for family.
Women's lives show how goals link. Paid work raises women's dignity. Respect for women leads to more sharing of housework and acceptance of women working outside. A safe environment lets more women take up jobs or run a business. So people look at a mix of goals.
Worked example
Assertion (A): A person may accept a job that pays less but offers regular employment.
Reason (R): Development goals include security and freedom, not only higher income.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A is true: a lower-paid regular job can be preferred because it gives a sense of security.
- R is true: people seek equal treatment, freedom, security and respect besides income.
- R explains A: the person gives up some income to gain security, a non-material goal. (1 mark)
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- National development
- NCERT section National Development
If individuals want different things, they will also hold different ideas of what the country should do. Ask your class what India should do to develop and you will get many answers, some of them clashing. Citizens can disagree, sometimes sharply, about the path their country should take.
So national development is not just a list of wishes. It means asking hard questions. Should every idea count the same? If two ideas clash, how is the clash settled? Which choice treats everyone fairly? Does a plan help many people or only a few? Could something else work better?
Since even the meaning of development is varied, people will also disagree about the ways of developing, as the dam debate shows. The chapter's opening says these hopes can be achieved in real life only through a democratic political process. That is why this idea links closely to your Political Science book: debate, listening to all sides and fair decisions are part of development itself.
Worked example
Different people hold conflicting ideas about a country's development. Explain three questions a country must think about while deciding its national development goals. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Whether all ideas are equally important and how to decide when they conflict. (1 mark)
- Whether the path is fair and just for all, and benefits a large number of people rather than a small group. (1 mark)
- Whether there is a better way of doing things, decided through a democratic process. (1 mark)
Answer: First, since ideas conflict, the country must decide which ideas matter more and how to settle clashes. Second, it must ask whether the chosen path is fair and just and benefits most people, not a small group. Third, it must look for a better way, reached through a democratic process.
- Income as the main criterion: per capita income and World Bank classification
- NCERT section How to Compare Different Countries or States?
To compare things we pick one or more important characteristics. The choice depends on the purpose, just as you choose a sports team and a debate team differently. For comparing countries, income is taken as one of the most important attributes. The thinking is that more income means more of all the things people need.
Total income of a country is the income of all its residents. But total income is not useful for comparison, because countries have different populations. A big country can have a large total income while its average person earns little. So we use average income, also called per capita income: total income divided by total population.
The World Bank uses this criterion in its World Development Reports. As the NCERT text gives it, countries with per capita income of 66,500 US dollars per annum and above in 2024 are high income or rich countries, and those with about 2,300 US dollars or less are low-income countries. India, at about 11,000 US dollars in 2024, is a low middle income country. Rich countries, excluding countries of the Middle East and certain other small countries, are generally called developed countries.
Worked example
Why is total income not a useful measure for comparing countries? How does the World Bank use income to classify countries? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Countries have different populations, so total income does not show what an average person is likely to earn. (1 mark)
- So per capita income, that is total income divided by total population, is used for comparison. (1 mark)
- World Bank: high income at 66,500 US dollars and above per annum (2024), low income at about 2,300 US dollars or less; India is low middle income at about 11,000 US dollars. (1 mark)
Answer: Countries differ in population, so total income does not tell us what an average person earns. Hence per capita income (total income divided by population) is used. The World Bank calls countries with 66,500 US dollars and above (2024) high income, about 2,300 US dollars or less low income; India is low middle income.
- Limitations of averages: distribution of income
- NCERT section How to Compare Different Countries or States?
An average is handy for comparing, but it can look fine while hiding who is left behind. The NCERT example uses two countries with five citizens each. In Country A monthly incomes are ₹ 9,500, ₹ 10,500, ₹ 9,800, ₹ 10,000 and ₹ 10,200. In Country B four people earn ₹ 500 each and one earns ₹ 48,000. Both totals are ₹ 50,000, so both averages are ₹ 10,000.
Are they equally developed? If a lottery decided which citizen you would be, most people would choose Country A. There, nobody is very rich or extremely poor: income is equitably distributed. In Country B most people are poor and one is extremely rich.
So besides the size of per capita income, you must ask how income is shared. A rising average income over time does not prove that every section of society is better off; the gain may go to a few. This is a key limitation of using only per capita income.
Worked example
Study the monthly incomes (in ₹) of five citizens in two countries.
Country X: 2,000; 2,000; 2,000; 2,000; 42,000
Country Y: 9,000; 11,000; 10,000; 10,500; 9,500
Calculate the average income of each. In which country would you prefer to live if a lottery decided your income, and what limitation of averages does this show? (3 marks)Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Country X: total ₹ 50,000 divided by 5 = ₹ 10,000; Country Y: total ₹ 50,000 divided by 5 = ₹ 10,000. (1 mark)
- Prefer Country Y, because income is equitably distributed and no one is extremely poor; in X four citizens are poor and one is very rich. (1 mark)
- Averages are useful for comparison but hide how income is distributed among people. (1 mark)
Answer: Both averages are ₹ 10,000 (₹ 50,000 divided by 5). Country Y is preferable because income is shared equitably, while in Country X four people are poor and one is very rich. This shows that averages help comparison but hide disparities in distribution.
- Income and other criteria: IMR, literacy and attendance
- NCERT section Income and Other Criteria
When we judge a state, income is not the only attribute that matters. Compare three states. By per capita income for 2023-24, Haryana is highest at ₹ 3,25,759, Kerala next at ₹ 2,81,001 and Bihar lowest at ₹ 60,337. On income alone, Haryana looks most developed.
Now look at other data. Infant Mortality Rate (2020) is 28 in Haryana, 6 in Kerala and 27 in Bihar. Literacy rate (2017-18) is 82%, 94% and 62%. Net Attendance Ratio at secondary stage is 73, 94 and 69. Kerala, with less income than Haryana, does far better on health and education. In Bihar about one-third of children aged 15-17 are not attending secondary school.
Why? Cash alone cannot get you clean air, safe medicines or protection from infectious diseases. You usually get clean air or pure medicines only if the place you live in already has them. Diseases are kept away only when everyone around you takes precautions too. So income does not fully show which goods and services people can actually use.
Worked example
Haryana has a higher per capita income than Kerala, yet Kerala is ahead in Infant Mortality Rate, literacy rate and Net Attendance Ratio. Use this to explain why income alone is not an adequate measure of development. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Per capita income 2023-24: Haryana ₹ 3,25,759, Kerala ₹ 2,81,001; by income Haryana looks more developed. (1 mark)
- IMR: Kerala 6, Haryana 28 per 1,000 live births, nearly three times higher in Haryana. (1 mark)
- Literacy 94% in Kerala vs 82% in Haryana; Net Attendance Ratio 94 vs 73. (1 mark)
- Money cannot buy all goods and services, such as a pollution-free environment, unadulterated medicines or protection from infectious diseases. (1 mark)
- So health and education indicators must be used along with income; Kerala does better because of adequate basic health and educational facilities. (1 mark)
Answer: By per capita income (2023-24), Haryana (₹ 3,25,759) is ahead of Kerala (₹ 2,81,001). Yet Kerala's IMR is only 6 against Haryana's 28 per 1,000 live births. Kerala's literacy rate is 94% against 82%, and its Net Attendance Ratio is 94 against 73. Private income cannot secure everything needed for a good life. Clean air, pure medicines and protection from infectious diseases depend on what the whole community has. Kerala does better because it provides adequate basic health and educational facilities. So income is useful but inadequate, and health and education indicators must be used with it.
- Public facilities
- NCERT section Public Facilities
Many important needs are met better, and at lower cost, when people arrange them together rather than one family at a time. This is collective provision. Security is an example: guarding a whole locality together costs less than every house hiring its own guard.
Education works the same way. You can study because many other children also want to study and because people believe the government should open schools. If nobody else in your area wanted to study, you could study only if your family could afford a private school elsewhere. Even now, in many areas, children, especially girls, cannot reach high school because adequate facilities have not been provided.
The chapter gives two clear cases. Kerala has a low Infant Mortality Rate because it has adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities. In some states the Public Distribution System (ration shops) works well, and health and nutrition there are likely to be better. A study found 90 per cent of rural people in Tamil Nadu used a ration shop, against only 35 per cent in West Bengal. So development depends not just on private income but on what society provides together.
Worked example
A study found that 90 per cent of rural people in Tamil Nadu used a ration shop, while only 35 per cent of rural people in West Bengal did so. In which state are rural people likely to be better off? Give reasons. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Rural people in Tamil Nadu are likely to be better off. (1 mark)
- A widely used ration shop shows the Public Distribution System functions well, giving people access to food grains collectively. (1 mark)
- Where PDS works well, health and nutritional status are likely to be better; income alone cannot ensure this. (1 mark)
Answer: Rural people in Tamil Nadu are likely to be better off. High use of ration shops shows the Public Distribution System works well there. Collective provision of food improves health and nutrition, which private income alone may not secure, as in West Bengal where far fewer use it.
- Human Development Report and HDI
- NCERT section Public Facilities
Once we accept that income is important but inadequate, we need other criteria. A long list would not help, so we choose a few of the most important. Health and education indicators are among them and are now widely used along with income.
The Human Development Report published by UNDP compares countries on three things: educational levels of people, their health status and per capita income. The ranking is called the Human Development Index (HDI). The World Bank, by contrast, uses per capita income alone.
Data for 2023 (Human Development Report 2025) shows Sri Lanka, a small neighbour, ahead of India in every respect: per capita income 12,616 against 9,047 (2021 PPP dollars), life expectancy 77.5 against 72 years, mean years of schooling 10.8 against 6.9, and HDI rank 89 against 130 out of 193 countries. Bangladesh has a lower per capita income than India (8,498) but a higher life expectancy (74.7).
Income here is measured in dollars so that every dollar buys the same amount of goods in any country. By adding 'Human' to 'Development', the report shows that people, their health and well-being matter most.
Worked example
According to the Human Development Report 2025, Bangladesh had a per capita income of 8,498 (2021 PPP dollars) and life expectancy of 74.7 years, while India had 9,047 and 72 years. What does this show about income as a measure of development, and how does the UNDP criterion address the problem? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Bangladesh has lower per capita income than India but people live longer on average. (1 mark)
- So higher income does not automatically mean better health; income alone is an inadequate measure. (1 mark)
- UNDP compares countries on educational levels, health status and per capita income together, unlike the World Bank's income-only criterion. (1 mark)
Answer: Bangladesh earns less per person than India, yet its life expectancy is higher. So higher income does not guarantee better health, and income alone is inadequate. UNDP's Human Development Report solves this by ranking countries on education, health and per capita income together, not on income alone.
- Sustainability of development
- NCERT section Sustainability of Development
Suppose a country is developed. We want that level to rise or at least last for future generations. But since the second half of the twentieth century, scientists have been warning that development of today's kind and scale cannot go on for ever: it is not sustainable.
Groundwater is a renewable resource: nature refills it through rain, as it does with crops and plants. Yet even a renewable resource can be overused if we take out more than is refilled. About 300 districts have reported a water level fall of over 4 metres in 20 years, and nearly one-third of the country overuses groundwater. Overuse shows up both in rich farming belts and in fast-growing cities.
Crude oil is non-renewable: a fixed stock that cannot be replenished. New discoveries add to it, but over time it will run out. World reserves (2017) would last about 47 years at present rates. India imports oil, so price rises burden everyone.
Degradation does not respect state or national borders, so our futures are linked. Sustainability is a new field where scientists, economists, philosophers and other social scientists work together.
Worked example
"Present levels of development are not sustainable." Evaluate the statement with the examples of groundwater and crude oil. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Sustainable development means keeping development going for future generations; scientists warn present levels cannot last. (1 mark)
- Groundwater is renewable but overused when use exceeds replenishment by rain; about 300 districts show a fall of over 4 metres in 20 years and one-third of the country overuses it. (1 mark)
- Crude oil is non-renewable; new finds add to stock but it will be exhausted; world reserves would last about 47 years at present rates. (1 mark)
- India imports oil, so rising prices burden everyone. (1 mark)
- Degradation crosses state and national borders, so the future is linked and resources must be used carefully. (1 mark)
Answer: Development must last for future generations, but scientists warn present levels cannot. Groundwater is renewable, yet it is overused when we draw more than rain replaces. About 300 districts show a fall of over 4 metres in 20 years, and one-third of the country overuses it. Crude oil is non-renewable. New discoveries add to the stock, but world reserves would last only about 47 years at present rates. India imports oil, so price rises burden everyone. Environmental damage crosses state and national borders, so our future is linked. Hence the statement is valid, and we must use resources within limits.
Development in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
Different people, different and conflicting development goals
Suppose your town plans to widen the main road. Shop owners on the road want wider roads to bring more customers. Families who live along the road would lose part of their homes and want the old road kept, with a bypass built instead.
Explain how this situation shows that development goals can be both different and conflicting. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Each group seeks what fits its own life situation: customers for shopkeepers, secure homes for families.
- The goals clash: the wider road that helps shopkeepers would damage the families' homes.
- So what is development for one group may be destructive for another, just like big dams and displaced tribals.
Answer: Shopkeepers and families want different things because their situations differ. Their goals also conflict: widening the road helps shop owners but takes away part of families' homes. This shows that development for one group can be destructive for another, as with dams that displace tribals.
Memory hook: One road, two wishes: my gain can be your loss.
Income and other (non-material) goals
Imagine your elder cousin gets two job offers after college. One pays more but is in a far-off city, has no job security and long hours. The other pays less but is a regular job near home with time for family.
Which job should your cousin prefer if she values a mix of development goals? Justify. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Income is important, but people also seek security, freedom and time for family.
- The lower-paid regular job gives a sense of security and leaves time for family.
- The higher-paid job without security reduces her sense of security and freedom, so the regular job may suit her better.
Answer: She may prefer the lower-paid regular job. Development goals include security, freedom and family life, not only income. The regular job gives security and family time, while the high-paid job without security would reduce her sense of security and freedom.
Memory hook: More pay is not always more life.
Limitations of averages: distribution of income
Suppose in a class test the average mark of Section P and Section Q is the same. In Section P most students scored close to the average. In Section Q a few scored very high and many scored very low.
Using the idea of averages in development, explain what the equal averages hide and which section is doing better as a group. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Averages are useful for comparing two groups quickly.
- But averages hide how marks are spread; Section Q has large gaps between a few toppers and many weak scorers.
- Section P is better as a group because marks are more evenly shared, like Country A with equitable income.
Answer: Equal averages hide the spread. In Section Q a few high scorers pull the average up while many score low. Section P, where most are near the average, is doing better as a group, just as a country with equitable income distribution is preferred.
Memory hook: Same average, different story: always ask how it is shared.
Public facilities
Imagine a village where the ration shop opens regularly and gives grain on time, while in a nearby village the ration shop is often shut. Families in both villages earn about the same.
In which village are families likely to be healthier, and why do public facilities matter even when incomes are similar? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Families in the village with a working ration shop are likely to be better nourished.
- A well-running Public Distribution System gives food to all collectively, which private income alone may not secure.
- So equal incomes can still lead to different well-being, because quality of life also depends on public facilities.
Answer: Families in the village with the working ration shop are likely to be healthier. A functioning PDS makes food available to everyone, improving nutrition. Even with similar incomes, quality of life differs because public facilities provide what money in the pocket cannot.
Memory hook: Same income, different ration shop, different health.
Sustainability of development
Suppose your housing society's borewell has to be dug deeper every year to find water. At a meeting, one member proposes that the society agree to draw only as much water each year as the rains can put back, and cut down on waste. Another member says the society should simply keep digging deeper.
Decide which suggestion supports sustainable development and justify your choice. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Groundwater is a renewable resource that rain replenishes, but it is overused when more is drawn than rain puts back.
- Keeping use within what rain replaces is sustainable use, so the water can last for future residents.
- Digging deeper only draws out more water, so the level keeps falling: this is overuse, not lasting development.
Answer: The first suggestion supports sustainable development. Groundwater is renewable, but only as long as use does not exceed what rain replenishes. Limiting use to that amount keeps the resource for future residents. Digging deeper just pulls out more water, so the decline continues and the resource is overused.
Memory hook: Take only what the rain gives back.
Topics in this chapter
- Development Goals of Different People
- National Development and Per Capita Income
- Income and Other Criteria of Development
- Public Facilities and Sustainability of DevelopmentComing soon
Development: key facts
- Per capita income
- Per capita (average) income = total income of the country divided by its total population
- Use in any question on comparing countries and in average-income calculations.
- World Bank high income
- Per capita income of 66,500 US dollars per annum and above (2024) = high income or rich countries, as given in the NCERT text
- Use in the World Bank classification answer.
- World Bank low income
- Per capita income of about 2,300 US dollars or less = low-income countries
- Pair with the high-income figure in a 3-mark classification answer.
- India's category
- India = low middle income country, per capita income about 11,000 US dollars per annum in 2024
- Quote when asked where India stands in the World Bank classification.
- Developed countries
- Rich countries, excluding Middle East and certain other small countries, are generally called developed
- Use for a 1-mark MCQ or to finish the classification answer.
- Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
- Number of children dying before age one per 1,000 live births in that year
- Lower IMR means better health care; Kerala 6, Haryana 28, Bihar 27 (2020).
- Literacy rate
- Proportion of literate population in the age group 7 and above
- Kerala 94%, Haryana 82%, Bihar 62% (2017-18).
- Net Attendance Ratio
- Children aged 15-17 attending school as a percentage of all children of that age
- Kerala 94, Haryana 73, Bihar 69; shows school access, not just enrolment.
- Per capita income of states (2023-24)
- Haryana ₹ 3,25,759; Kerala ₹ 2,81,001; Bihar ₹ 60,337
- Use to show that the richest state is not the best on health and education.
- Human Development Report
- Published by UNDP; compares countries on educational levels, health status and per capita income
- Use when contrasting UNDP with the World Bank's income-only criterion.
- Life expectancy at birth
- Average expected length of life of a person at the time of birth
- Sri Lanka 77.5, Bangladesh 74.7, India 72 (2023 data).
- Purchasing power (PPP) dollars
- Income measured in dollars so that every dollar buys the same amount of goods and services in any country
- Explains why GNI per capita in Table 1.6 can be compared across countries.
- Body Mass Index (BMI)
- BMI = weight in kg divided by the square of height in metres
- A way to check nutrition; below normal means underweight, above means overweight.
- Renewable resource
- Replenished by nature, like crops, plants and groundwater; can still be overused
- Groundwater is overused when use exceeds replenishment by rain.
- Non-renewable resource
- Fixed stock that cannot be replenished and gets exhausted, like crude oil
- New discoveries add to stock, but it still runs out over time.
- Crude oil reserves (2017)
- World reserves would last about 47 years; Middle East about 70 years; USA about 10.5 years
- Use as evidence in a sustainability answer.
How the board asks Development
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Concept MCQ and assertion-reason | One-mark questions on why people have different goals, what per capita income means, which body uses which criterion, or renewable versus non-renewable resources. | Check each option against the exact idea in the chapter. For assertion-reason, test A and R separately first, then ask whether R truly explains A. |
| Average income calculation | A small table of family or citizen incomes; find the average, a missing income, or decide which country is better. | Total = average multiplied by number of people. Subtract the known incomes to find the missing one. Then comment on distribution, since equal averages can hide inequality. |
| Table on states (income, IMR, literacy, attendance) | A table of states, sometimes named only by letters, asking which is better developed and why, and what each should improve. | Quote at least two numbers. Remember lower IMR is better, higher literacy and attendance are better. Conclude that income alone is inadequate and suggest health and education facilities. |
| India and neighbours (Human Development Report) | Table 1.6-style data on income, life expectancy, schooling and HDI rank; compare countries or explain the UNDP criterion. | State the three UNDP components. Use a pair like Sri Lanka and India or Bangladesh and India to show that income rank and human development do not always match. |
| 3-mark reasoning answer | Explain the role of public facilities, the limitations of averages, or why total income is not used. Up to 60 words. | Give three separate value points, one sentence each, with one chapter example such as collective security, Kerala's health facilities or the PDS. |
| 5-mark evaluate or justify | Evaluate a statement such as goals of different people differ, income is the main criterion, or development must be sustainable. Up to 120 words. | Write five points: meaning, two examples, a limitation or counter-point, and a balanced conclusion. Stay inside 120 words. |
| Case or passage on sustainability | A short passage on groundwater overuse or toxic waste dumping, followed by questions on cause, who gained and lost, and what should be done. | Pick out the resource or harm in the passage, link it to renewable or non-renewable use, and suggest a goal that protects future generations. |
| BMI method | Define Body Mass Index and explain how it is calculated. | Give the definition, the steps (weight in kg, height converted to metres, divide weight by square of height) and what the result shows (normal, underweight or overweight). |
Tricks to remember Development
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
Two lines on goals
Different goals + conflicting goals = 'mine may not be yours, and mine may hurt yours.'
Use it when: Opens any answer on different people, different goals.
World Bank vs UNDP
World Bank = Wallet only (income). UNDP = 'HEI': Health, Education, Income.
Use it when: Answers the difference between the two criteria in seconds.
Reading the state table
IMR: lower is better. Literacy and attendance: higher is better. Kerala wins K-H-B on all three despite lower income than Haryana.
Use it when: Stops you misreading data tables under exam pressure.
Missing income check
Average x number = total. Total minus knowns = missing. Then add all back to check.
Use it when: Average and missing-income MCQs.
Resource types
Renewable = Refilled by nature (groundwater, crops). Non-renewable = Never refilled (crude oil).
Use it when: Assertion-reason and sustainability answers.
Public facilities in three words
Collective, Cheaper, Kerala.
Use it when: Reminds you of the reason (collective provision is cheaper) and the example (Kerala's health and education).
Development: board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: World Bank category of India · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
According to the World Development Report criterion described in the NCERT text, in which category does India fall?
(a) High income country
(b) Low income country
(c) Low middle income country
(d) Developed country
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The World Bank classifies countries by per capita income.
- Countries with 66,500 US dollars per annum and above (2024) are high income, and those with about 2,300 US dollars or less are low income.
- India's per capita income in 2024, as given in the text, falls between these, so India is a low middle income country.
Answer: (c) Low middle income country
Example 2: Why Kerala has a low IMR · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonBoard level
Assertion (A): Kerala has a lower Infant Mortality Rate than Haryana.
Reason (R): Kerala has adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Check A: Kerala's IMR (2020) is 6 per 1,000 live births and Haryana's is 28, so A is true.
- Check R: the text states that Kerala has adequate basic health and educational facilities, so R is true.
- Link: the text gives these facilities as the reason for Kerala's low IMR, so R explains A.
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Example 3: Why public facilities are provided collectively · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Explain, with three examples, why many important goods and services work better and cost less when they are arranged for the whole community rather than by each family alone. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Security: one security arrangement for a whole locality costs less than separate security staff for every house.
- Schooling: a child can study in the locality because many children want to study and the government opens schools. Alone, only a family that can afford a private school elsewhere could manage it.
- Health and food: preventive steps against infectious diseases work only when the whole community takes them, and a well-run PDS improves people's nutrition.
Answer: - Collective security for a locality is cheaper than every house hiring its own guards.
- Government schools let all children study. Without them, only families who can afford private schools could educate their children.
- Disease prevention and a working PDS protect everyone's health and nutrition, which one family's income cannot secure alone.
Example 4: UNDP criterion versus World Bank criterion · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
In what ways is the criterion used by UNDP for measuring development different from the one used by the World Bank? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- World Bank: uses one main criterion, per capita income, to classify countries as high income, low middle income or low income.
- UNDP: the Human Development Report compares countries on educational levels, health status and per capita income together.
- Difference in focus: the World Bank looks at income, while UNDP puts people, their health and well-being, at the centre. A country can rank lower on HDI than its income suggests.
Answer: - The World Bank uses only per capita income to classify countries.
- UNDP's Human Development Report uses three things: education (mean years of schooling), health (life expectancy) and per capita income.
- So UNDP gives a wider, people-centred picture. For example, Bangladesh has a lower income than India but a longer life expectancy.
Example 5: Income as a criterion and the World Bank classification · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
How is income an important factor in assessing the development of a country? Explain the classification of countries done by the World Bank, and state one limitation of this criterion. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Importance: more income is taken to mean more of all the things people need, so countries with higher income are treated as more developed.
- Per capita income is used because countries have different populations. Total income divided by population shows what an average person earns.
- World Bank classification: countries with per capita income of 66,500 US dollars per annum and above (2024) are high income or rich countries, and those with about 2,300 US dollars or less are low income countries.
- India falls in the low middle income category. Rich countries, except those of the Middle East and certain small countries, are generally called developed.
- Limitation: per capita income hides how income is distributed. It also does not show health, education or other things money cannot buy.
Answer: Income is a key criterion because higher income lets people get more of what they need, so higher-income countries are seen as more developed. Since populations differ, we use per capita income, which is total income divided by population.
The World Bank uses this criterion. Countries earning 66,500 US dollars per annum and above (2024) are high income or rich. Those earning about 2,300 US dollars or less are low income. India is a low middle income country. Rich countries, except those of the Middle East and certain small countries, are called developed.
Limitation: an average hides inequality. It also ignores health and education, as Kerala's better IMR despite lower income than Haryana shows.
Example 6: Evaluate: development goals differ · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
"The development goals of different categories of people may differ and may even conflict." Evaluate the statement with suitable examples. (5 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- People seek what matters most in their own life situation, so their goals differ.
- Landless rural labourers want more days of work, better wages, quality local schooling and no social discrimination.
- Prosperous farmers from Punjab want high family income through higher support prices and hardworking, cheap labourers. This conflicts with the labourers' wish for better wages.
- A girl from a rich urban family wants as much freedom as her brother and wants him to share housework, which he may not like.
- Industrialists may want more dams for electricity, but dams can submerge land and displace people such as tribals, who may prefer small check dams or tanks. Conclusion: development for one may be destructive for another.
Answer: The statement is valid, because people's goals depend on their life situations.
- Landless labourers want more work, better wages, good local schools and no discrimination.
- Prosperous Punjab farmers want higher support prices and cheap labour. This clashes with labourers' demand for better wages.
- A rich urban girl wants freedom equal to her brother's and wants him to share housework, which he may resent.
- Industrialists want big dams for electricity, but displaced tribals may resent losing land and prefer check dams or tanks.
So goals are not only different but can conflict, and what is development for one group may even be destructive for another.
Example 7: Reading state data: which state is more developed? · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Study the data (from Table 1.4 of the NCERT textbook):
Haryana: IMR 28, Literacy Rate 82%, Net Attendance Ratio 73
Kerala: IMR 6, Literacy Rate 94%, Net Attendance Ratio 94
Bihar: IMR 27, Literacy Rate 62%, Net Attendance Ratio 69
Haryana has the highest per capita income of the three. Which state has the best human development? Justify, and state what this tells you about income as a measure. (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Identify: Kerala is best on all three indicators, with the lowest IMR (6), the highest literacy (94%) and the highest attendance (94).
- Reason: Kerala has adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities.
- Inference: Haryana has more income than Kerala but lags in these areas, so income is not an adequate measure of development. Bihar must focus on schooling and health, and Haryana on child health.
Answer: Kerala has the best human development. Its IMR is only 6 against 28 in Haryana and 27 in Bihar, and its literacy and attendance are both 94. This comes from adequate public health and education facilities. Haryana's higher income has not bought it the same results, so income alone is not an adequate measure of development.
Example 8: Undernourishment data and its causes · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Percentage of adults (15-49 years) with BMI below normal, 2019-21:
Kerala: Male 8.5, Female 10
Madhya Pradesh: Male 28, Female 28
All States: Male 20, Female 23
(i) Compare nutrition in Kerala and Madhya Pradesh.
(ii) Why might about one-fifth of people in the country be undernourished even if there is enough food in the country? (3 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (i) In Madhya Pradesh 28% of men and women are undernourished, about three times the share in Kerala (8.5% of men, 10% of women). Kerala is far better nourished.
- (ii) Food being available in the country does not mean it reaches everyone. Many people may lack the income to buy enough.
- (ii) Where the Public Distribution System and health facilities work well, as in Kerala, nutrition is better. Where they are weak, undernourishment stays high. Women are worse off than men in the all-state figures.
Answer: (i) Kerala is much better nourished: about 8.5-10% of adults there are undernourished, against 28% in Madhya Pradesh.
(ii) Enough food in the country does not mean every family can get it. Poor families may not afford enough food, and where the PDS and health facilities are weak, food and care do not reach them. So about 20% of men and 23% of women remain undernourished.
Example 9: Unseen state data: which state is more developed? · 5 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
Study the imaginary data for three states.
State P: per capita income ₹ 2,40,000; IMR 30; literacy rate 80%; Net Attendance Ratio 70
State Q: per capita income ₹ 1,80,000; IMR 8; literacy rate 93%; Net Attendance Ratio 90
State R: per capita income ₹ 70,000; IMR 26; literacy rate 65%; Net Attendance Ratio 68
(a) Which state is likely to have the best human development? (1 mark)
(b) Justify your answer with two reasons. (2 marks)
(c) Suggest what State P and State R should each focus on to improve their overall development. (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (a) State Q, even though its per capita income is lower than State P's. (1 mark)
- (b) Health: Q's IMR is 8 per 1,000 live births against 30 in P and 26 in R, which points to better basic health care. (1 mark)
- (b) Education: Q has the highest literacy rate (93%) and Net Attendance Ratio (90), so more children stay in school. (1 mark)
- (c) State P has the most income but the highest IMR and low attendance; it should provide more health centres and schools, since income alone has not bought these results. (1 mark)
- (c) State R is weak on income, health and education together; it needs more work and income for its people along with public health care, schools and a working PDS. (1 mark)
Answer: (a) State Q is likely to have the best human development.
(b) Its IMR is only 8, against 30 in P and 26 in R, showing better basic health care. Its literacy rate (93%) and attendance (90) are the highest, so more children are in school. This is despite its income being lower than P's.
(c) State P should use its higher income for public health and schools to cut its IMR and raise attendance. State R needs more jobs and income, along with health facilities, schools and a working PDS. The data shows income alone is not an adequate measure of development.
Case-study practice (Section E style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 5-mark question split into 1 + 2 + 2 marks.
Three states, one project
Suppose two classmates are preparing a Social Science project. They collect the following imaginary data on three states.
State X: per capita income ₹ 3,00,000; Infant Mortality Rate 25; literacy rate 84%; rural people using a ration shop 30%
State Y: per capita income ₹ 2,00,000; Infant Mortality Rate 7; literacy rate 95%; rural people using a ration shop 85%
State Z: per capita income ₹ 65,000; Infant Mortality Rate 28; literacy rate 63%; rural people using a ration shop 40%
One classmate says State X must be the most developed because its people earn the most. The other is not so sure. They agree to look at all the figures before writing their conclusion.
(i) · 1 mark
If per capita income alone is used, which state would be called the most developed? Why would this conclusion be misleading?
Answer
Answer: State X. It is misleading because X has a much higher IMR (25) and lower literacy (84%) than State Y, so its higher income has not brought better health and education.
Income alone does not show which goods and services people can actually use, so it is an inadequate measure on its own.
(ii) · 2 marks
Give two reasons why State Y is likely to be ahead of State X in human development, even though it earns less.
Answer
Answer: - Health: Y's IMR of 7 per 1,000 live births against X's 25 suggests adequate basic health care, as in Kerala.
- Public facilities: 85% of rural people in Y use a ration shop and literacy is 95%, showing a working PDS and schooling that private income alone cannot buy.One mark for each reason that is backed by a figure from the data and linked to public facilities.
(iii) · 2 marks
Suggest one area each in which State X and State Z should improve.
Answer
Answer: - State X should use its higher income to provide better public health care and a better-run PDS, to bring down its IMR.
- State Z needs more work and income for its people, along with schools and health facilities to raise its 63% literacy and cut its IMR of 28.One mark for each state, with the suggestion linked to that state's weakest figures.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
Why do we use averages to compare the development of countries? Explain two limitations of averages. (3 marks) (3 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Countries differ in population, so total income cannot be compared directly. Per capita income (total income divided by population) shows what an average person is likely to earn. | 1 |
| An average hides how income is distributed. Two countries with the same average may have fairly equal incomes in one, and one very rich person with many poor people in the other. | 1 |
| A rising average does not prove that every section is better off; the gain may go to only a few. | 1 |
Why is the issue of sustainability important for development? Explain three points. (3 marks) (3 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Development should not only go up but also be kept for future generations. Present levels and types of development use up resources faster than they are replaced. | 1 |
| Renewable resources such as groundwater are overused when we take out more than rain puts back. Non-renewable resources such as crude oil have a fixed stock and will run out. | 1 |
| Environmental damage does not respect national or state boundaries, so our future is linked. Development must be planned so that it can last. | 1 |
How does the Human Development Report measure development? Analyse India's position among its neighbours using the Human Development Report 2025 data. (5 marks) (5 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| The Human Development Report, published by UNDP, compares countries on the educational levels of people, their health status and per capita income. | 1 |
| Adding 'Human' to 'Development' shows that what matters most is what happens to people: their health and well-being. | 1 |
| Sri Lanka, a small neighbour, is ahead of India on every item: per capita income 12,616 against 9,047 (2021 PPP dollars), life expectancy 77.5 against 72 years, mean years of schooling 10.8 against 6.9, and HDI rank 89 against 130. | 1 |
| Bangladesh has a lower per capita income than India (8,498) but a longer life expectancy (74.7 years) and the same HDI rank of 130. | 1 |
| Conclusion: India ranks above Pakistan, Myanmar and Nepal, but a big country with a rank of 130 out of 193 shows that income alone does not decide human development. | 1 |
Where students lose marks in Development
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Saying per capita income is useless
Students over-learn the Kerala and Haryana example and swing to the opposite extreme.
Wrong working
Per capita income should not be used at all because Kerala has lower income but better human development.
Right working
Per capita income is useful for comparison, but it is not adequate on its own. It must be used with health and education indicators.
Do this: Always write 'useful but inadequate' and name the indicators to add.
Usually costs: 1 to 2 marks in a 3- or 5-mark answer.
Mistake: Reading IMR the wrong way round
With literacy and attendance, higher is better, so students assume the same for IMR.
Wrong working
Haryana is better in health because its IMR of 28 is higher than Kerala's 6.
Right working
Kerala is better in health because its IMR of 6 is far lower than Haryana's 28 per 1,000 live births.
Do this: Remember IMR counts deaths of babies before age one: lower means better.
Usually costs: 1 mark in an MCQ, and the whole conclusion in a table question.
Mistake: Treating average income as the full story
Students compute the average and stop.
Wrong working
Country A and Country B both have an average of ₹ 10,000, so they are equally developed.
Right working
Both averages are ₹ 10,000, but A has equitable distribution while in B four people are poor and one is very rich, so A is preferred.
Do this: After any average, add one line on distribution.
Usually costs: 1 mark in a 3-mark question.
Mistake: Calling groundwater non-renewable
Students link 'running out' with non-renewable.
Wrong working
Groundwater is a non-renewable resource, so it is being exhausted.
Right working
Groundwater is renewable because rain replenishes it, but it is overused when we take out more than is replenished.
Do this: Separate the type of resource from the problem of overuse.
Usually costs: 1 mark in assertion-reason or a sustainability answer.
Mistake: Mixing up the World Bank and UNDP criteria
Both bodies appear in the same section of revision notes.
Wrong working
The World Bank uses health, education and income, while UNDP uses only per capita income.
Right working
The World Bank uses per capita income. UNDP's Human Development Report uses educational levels, health status and per capita income.
Do this: Use the 'Wallet vs HEI' trick before writing.
Usually costs: Up to 2 marks, or the full answer to a 'differentiate' question.
Mistake: Writing only one-sided examples for conflicting goals
Students show different goals but not how one hurts another.
Wrong working
Industrialists want dams for electricity. Farmers want higher crop prices.
Right working
Industrialists want dams for electricity, but dams submerge land and displace tribals, who would prefer small check dams or tanks.
Do this: For 'conflicting', show the same action helping one group and harming another.
Usually costs: 1 mark per weak example.
NCERT exercise guide: Development
What each exercise in the NCERT chapter tests, how to approach it, and a question of the same kind solved step by step. Questions here are written in our own words.
Let's Work These Out (development goals, income and other goals)
What it tests: Why people hold different and conflicting development goals, and why goals other than income (security, freedom, respect, equal treatment) matter.
How to approach it: Always link a person's goal to their life situation. Give one concrete example for every point, such as a job choice, a girl's wish for equal freedom, or a dam that helps some and displaces others. Keep the word 'conflicting' for cases where one person's gain is another person's loss.
Mirrors the questions on factors other than income
Give two examples where something other than income decides a person's choice. Explain why it matters. (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Example 1: a person may pick a job that pays less but is regular, because it gives a sense of security.
- Example 2: before taking a job in a far-off place, a person looks at facilities for the family, the working atmosphere and the chance to learn.
- Reason: quality of life depends on non-material things such as security, freedom, respect and friendship, not only on money.
Answer: - A person may choose a lower-paid but regular job because it gives security.
- A person may refuse a high-paying job far away if it offers no facilities for the family or no time with them.
- So development goals include non-material things like security, freedom and respect. These are hard to measure but no less important.
Let's Work These Out (comparing countries and average income)
What it tests: Using averages to compare, why average income is an important criterion, and how averages hide the distribution of income.
How to approach it: Work out the average first: total divided by number of people. Then check the spread: are most people near the average, or is one person pulling it up? An answer that only calculates gets part marks. Explain what the number hides.
Mirrors the question on a rising average income over time
The average monthly income of five families in a village rose over five years. A student concludes that every family is now better off. Is the student right? Illustrate with figures. (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Year 1: each family earns ₹ 4,000, so the total is ₹ 20,000 and the average is ₹ 4,000.
- Year 5: incomes are ₹ 3,000, ₹ 3,000, ₹ 3,000, ₹ 3,000 and ₹ 13,000, so the total is ₹ 25,000 and the average is ₹ 5,000.
- The average has risen, but four of the five families now earn less. The rise has gone to one family only.
- Conclusion: averages do not show distribution, so the student is wrong.
Answer: No. In the example the average rose from ₹ 4,000 to ₹ 5,000, yet four families fell from ₹ 4,000 to ₹ 3,000 while one family rose to ₹ 13,000. A rising average does not tell us how income is shared. We must also look at its distribution.
Let's Work These Out (public facilities)
What it tests: Why income is not an adequate indicator, why collective provision of goods and services is better and cheaper, and the role of PDS, health and education facilities.
How to approach it: Start from the idea that personal income alone cannot get you everything a good life needs. Then give examples of what the community or government provides together: schools, health care, security, a ration shop. Compare states using the tables, not your opinion.
Mirrors the question on whether good facilities depend only on money spent by the government
Two districts spend the same amount on public health. One has far better health results. Suggest three reasons for the difference. (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Facilities must actually work. A ration shop or health centre that opens regularly helps people; one that stays shut does not.
- Infectious diseases are controlled only when the whole community takes preventive steps together.
- Education matters too. Where schools are provided for all children, including girls, people are better able to use health facilities.
Answer: - How well the facilities run matters, not only the money spent. A well-run PDS and health centres improve health and nutrition.
- Community action matters, because preventive steps work only when everyone takes them.
- Education helps, as Kerala shows: adequate basic health and education facilities go together with a low infant mortality rate.
Activity 1 (newspaper report and debates on ways of developing)
What it tests: Identifying who gains and who loses from a development activity, and suggesting a fair development goal.
How to approach it: Make two lists, gainers and losers. Then state a goal that protects people and the environment while still allowing progress. Remember that even the idea of development can vary, so ways of developing can be argued over too.
Mirrors the toxic-waste news report task
Suppose a factory is set up near a coastal village. It gives jobs to some people but dumps its waste into the sea where local fishermen work. Who benefits, who does not, and what should the development goal be? (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Gainers: the factory owners, who make profit, and the villagers who get factory jobs.
- Losers: the fishermen, whose catch and health suffer, and families harmed by pollution.
- Goal: the factory should run only if it disposes of its waste safely, so that jobs grow without harming health or the sea.
Answer: The owners and the new workers benefit. The fishermen and families hit by pollution lose. The goal should be development that creates jobs and also protects health and the environment, the same lesson as the toxic waste dumped in Abidjan in Ivory Coast, where many people fell ill.
Activity 2 (educational achievement of rural Uttar Pradesh, Table 1.5)
What it tests: Reading a data table, working out percentages not attending school and illiteracy among children, and drawing conclusions about education as a public facility.
How to approach it: Subtract from 100 to find the missing share: those not attending school, or those not literate. Compare males and females. End with what the numbers mean for the goal of free and compulsory education up to the age of 14.
Mirrors the fill-in-the-blanks on Table 1.5
Using Table 1.5, find (i) the gap between the literacy rates of the rural male and rural female population, and (ii) the percentage of rural boys and girls aged 10-14 who are not literate. What does this show? (3 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- (i) Rural male literacy is 76% and rural female literacy is 54%, so the gap is 76 − 54 = 22 percentage points.
- (ii) Literacy of rural children aged 10-14 is 90% for boys and 87% for girls, so 100 − 90 = 10% of boys and 100 − 87 = 13% of girls are not literate.
- Inference: girls lag behind boys, and the goal of free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 is still not fully met.
Answer: (i) 22 percentage points.
(ii) 10% of rural boys and 13% of rural girls aged 10-14 are not literate.
This shows a gender gap. Even many years after independence, schooling facilities in rural areas are not enough, especially for girls.
Exercises (end-of-chapter)
What it tests: MCQs on the criteria of development, average income sums, World Bank and UNDP criteria, limitations of averages, Kerala and Haryana, sustainability, energy sources, environmental degradation, Table 1.6 and the BMI data table.
How to approach it: For sums, find the total first (average × number of units), then subtract the known values. For 'discuss' or 'do you agree' questions, give both sides and end with a balanced conclusion. Quote figures from the tables exactly as the textbook gives them.
Mirrors the four-family average income MCQ
There are five families in a village. Their average income is ₹ 6,000. Four of them earn ₹ 5,000, ₹ 8,000, ₹ 4,000 and ₹ 7,000. What is the income of the fifth family?
(a) ₹ 4,000
(b) ₹ 6,000
(c) ₹ 7,000
(d) ₹ 8,000
Show the solutionSolution
- Total income = average × number of families = 6,000 × 5 = ₹ 30,000.
- Income of the four known families = 5,000 + 8,000 + 4,000 + 7,000 = ₹ 24,000.
- Fifth family = 30,000 − 24,000 = ₹ 6,000.
Answer: (b) ₹ 6,000
Development: previous year questions
- Asked in 21 of the 21 board papers we hold (2023 to 2026), on average 5 marks per paper; 65 questions in all, counting OR alternatives. In 4 of 4 sample papers.
Counted from the real papers on our previous year papers page, not estimated. Average marks are over every board paper we hold, with an OR pair counted once. Chapter tags are ours.
Solved board questions from Development
Real questions from recent papers. Try each one first, then open our step-by-step solution with marks per step.
2026, set 32/1/1, Q29 · 1 mark · MCQCompetency-based
Study the data of a State given below and answer the question that follow:
Educational achievement of rural population of State
| Category | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|
| I. Literacy rate of rural population | 76% | 54% |
| II. Literacy rate of rural children in age group of 10-14 years | 90% | 87% |
| III. Percentage of rural children aged 10-14 years attending school | 85% | 82% |
If rural children aged 10-14 years are considered, then how many female children are attending school?
- (A)90
- (B)85
- (C)82
- (D)83
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
Row III gives the percentage of rural children aged 10-14 attending school: females 82%. So 82 of every 100 female children attend school.
Answer: (C) 82
Where the marks are
- Reads 82% for females in row III (1 mark)
2026, set 32/2/1, Q37 · 3 marks · Short answer
Define the term 'Body Mass Index'. Explain the method of its calculation.
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
Body Mass Index (BMI) is a measure nutritionists use to judge whether a person is getting proper nutrition, that is, whether the person is underweight, normal or overweight.
- 1 mark
It is calculated as .
- 1 mark
If the height is in centimetres, convert it to metres first. Then divide the weight in kg by the square of the height.
Answer: BMI = weight (kg) ÷ height² (m²); it shows whether a person is adequately nourished.
Where the marks are
- Definition of BMI (1 mark)
- Formula weight/height² (1 mark)
- Conversion of height to metres and the method (1 mark)
2026, set 32/4/1, Q24 · 2 marks · Very short answer
Suggest any two ways to promote Women's Entrepreneurship in the economy.
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1 mark
Provide easy loans at low interest, so that women have the capital to start businesses.
- 1 mark
Provide vocational and skill training and women-focused start-up schemes, with subsidies and tax benefits, to help women run and grow businesses.
Answer: Easy low-interest loans; vocational training and women-focused schemes with subsidies.
Where the marks are
- First way explained (1 mark)
- Second way explained (1 mark)
Every Development question, by year
- For 2027
Sample paper 2026-27: Q23 (1 mark, solved), Q29 (1 mark, solved), Q38A (5 marks, solved), Q38B (5 marks, solved)
- 2026
Set 32/1/1: Q29 (1 mark, solved), Q33 (1 mark, solved), Q34 (1 mark, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q28 (1 mark, solved), Q33 (1 mark, solved), Q37 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q28 (1 mark, solved), Q30 (1 mark), Q34 (1 mark, solved), Q37 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q24 (2 marks, solved), Q29 (1 mark, solved), Q33 (1 mark, solved), Q34 (1 mark, solved), Q37 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q21 (1 mark, solved), Q29 (1 mark, solved), Q34 (1 mark, solved), Q37 (3 marks, solved)
Sample paper 2025-26: Q30 (1 mark, solved), Q35 (3 marks, solved)
- 2025
Set 32/1/1: Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q33(b) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q33(a) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q8 (1 mark, solved), Q11 (1 mark, solved), Q33(b) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q14 (1 mark, solved), Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q20 (1 mark, solved), Q24 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q33(a) (5 marks, solved), Q33(b) (5 marks, solved)
Set 32/6/1: Q2 (1 mark, solved)
Sample paper 2024-25: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q36 (4 marks, solved)
- 2024
Set 32/1/1: Q14 (1 mark, solved), Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q29 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q14 (1 mark, solved), Q15 (1 mark, solved), Q20 (1 mark, solved)
Set 32/3/1: Q5 (1 mark, solved), Q16 (1 mark, solved), Q17 (1 mark, solved), Q23 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q19 (1 mark, solved), Q29 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q29 (3 marks, solved)
Sample paper 2023-24: Q3 (1 mark, solved), Q36 (4 marks, solved)
- 2023
Set 32/1/1: Q8 (1 mark, solved), Q12 (1 mark, solved), Q24 (2 marks, solved), Q27 (3 marks, solved)
Set 32/2/1: Q14 (1 mark, solved), Q15 (1 mark, solved)
Set 32/4/1: Q8 (1 mark, solved), Q11 (1 mark, solved), Q12 (1 mark, solved), Q13 (1 mark, solved), Q23 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/5/1: Q13 (1 mark, solved), Q24 (2 marks, solved)
Set 32/6/1: Q8 (1 mark, solved), Q9 (1 mark, solved), Q10 (1 mark, solved), Q24 (2 marks, solved), Q29 (3 marks, solved)
Practice questions on Development
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
There are four families in a village. Their average monthly income is ₹ 8,000. Three of them earn ₹ 6,000, ₹ 5,000 and ₹ 4,000. Which option correctly gives the fourth family's income and what the average shows?
(a) ₹ 17,000; income in the village is evenly shared
(b) ₹ 17,000; the average hides an unequal distribution of income
(c) ₹ 15,000; the average hides an unequal distribution of income
(d) ₹ 8,000; income in the village is evenly sharedHint
Find the total first, subtract the known incomes, then compare the fourth family with the rest.
Answer
(b) ₹ 17,000; the average hides an unequal distribution of income. Total = 8,000 × 4 = ₹ 32,000. Known incomes = 6,000 + 5,000 + 4,000 = ₹ 15,000. Fourth family = 32,000 − 15,000 = ₹ 17,000, which is more than the other three families earn together, so income is not evenly shared.
Q2 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level
Assertion (A): Kerala has a lower Infant Mortality Rate than Haryana.
Reason (R): Haryana has a higher per capita income than Kerala.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.Hint
Check both statements against the tables, then ask whether income is the cause of Kerala's low IMR.
Answer
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A. Kerala's IMR is 6 against Haryana's 28, and Haryana's per capita income is higher. But a higher income in Haryana cannot explain a lower IMR in Kerala. The real reason is Kerala's adequate basic health and educational facilities.
Q3 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Explain, with three examples, why a person's private income cannot secure everything needed to live well. (3 marks)
Hint
Think of things the whole community must arrange together.
Answer
- A pollution-free environment: you normally get it only if the place you live in already has one.
- Unadulterated medicines: money alone cannot ensure that the medicines you buy are pure.
- Protection from infectious diseases: this needs the whole community to take preventive steps, not one family alone.
Q4 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Define Body Mass Index. Explain how it is calculated, with an example of a student who weighs 55 kg and is 160 cm tall. (3 marks)
Hint
Convert the height to metres before you square it.
Answer
BMI is a measure that nutrition scientists use to check whether a person is properly nourished.
Method: take the weight in kg, convert the height to metres, and divide the weight by the square of the height.
Example: 160 cm = 1.6 m, and 1.6 × 1.6 = 2.56, so BMI = 55 ÷ 2.56 ≈ 21.5. Compare this with the BMI-for-age table to see whether it is normal, underweight or overweight.Q5 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Distinguish between renewable and non-renewable resources. How can even a renewable resource be overused? Give an example. (3 marks)
Hint
Compare what nature replaces with what we use.
Answer
- Renewable resources, such as groundwater, crops and plants, are replenished by nature.
- Non-renewable resources, such as crude oil, have a fixed stock and will run out even if new sources are found.
- A renewable resource is overused when we take more than nature replaces. Groundwater use above what rain recharges has caused falling water levels in about 300 districts.
Q6 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Crude oil reserves (2017): Middle East 836 thousand million barrels, lasting 70 years; USA 69, lasting 10.5 years; World 1732, lasting 47 years. Looking at this data, what problems can India expect, given that it has to import crude oil? (3 marks)
Hint
Think about stock, dependence and price.
Answer
- World reserves will last only about 47 years at the present rate of extraction, so crude oil will run out.
- India does not have enough oil of its own and depends on imports. Any rise in oil prices becomes a burden for everyone.
- Countries with low reserves, such as the USA, try to secure oil through military or economic power, which makes supply uncertain. India must look for other sources.
Q7 · 5 marks · Long answerHarder board level
"Kerala has a lower per capita income than Haryana but better human development. So per capita income is of no use and should not be used to compare states." Do you agree? Give reasons. (5 marks)
Hint
Give both sides: why income is useful and why it is not enough.
Answer
Not fully. Per capita income is useful: it shows what an average person earns, it allows comparison across populations, and the World Bank uses it.
But it is inadequate. Kerala has an IMR of 6 against Haryana's 28, and better literacy and attendance, despite lower income. Averages hide distribution, and money cannot buy public facilities.
Conclusion: use income along with health and education indicators, as the Human Development Report does.Q8 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
"For development, people look at a mix of goals." Explain this with reference to women. (3 marks)
Hint
Link income, respect and safety to one another.
Answer
- When women do paid work, their dignity in the household and in society increases.
- When women are respected, housework is shared more and women working outside is more accepted.
- A safe and secure environment allows more women to take up different jobs or run a business. So income, respect and safety work together as goals.
Q9 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Rural Uttar Pradesh (Table 1.5): literacy of the rural population is male 76%, female 54%; children aged 10-14 attending school are boys 85%, girls 82%. Work out the share of children not in school and explain what the data shows about public facilities. (3 marks)
Hint
Subtract from 100, then compare boys and girls.
Answer
15% of rural boys and 18% of rural girls aged 10-14 are not in school, and adult female literacy lags male literacy by 22 points.
This shows that schooling facilities, especially for girls, are not enough. The constitutional goal of free and compulsory education up to the age of 14, expected by 1960, is still not met, so the government and society must provide better schools.Q10 · 1 mark · MCQHOTS / competency
Which conclusion is best supported by the Human Development Report 2025 data on India and its neighbours?
(a) A higher per capita income always means a longer life expectancy.
(b) Bangladesh has a lower per capita income than India but a longer life expectancy.
(c) Pakistan has more mean years of schooling than India.
(d) Myanmar has a better HDI rank than India.Hint
Check each option against the actual figures; remember a smaller rank number is better.
Answer
(b) Bangladesh earns 8,498 (2021 PPP dollars) against India's 9,047, yet its life expectancy is 74.7 years against India's 72. Option (a) is disproved by this, Pakistan's schooling (4.3 years) is below India's (6.9), and Myanmar's rank of 150 is worse than India's 130.
Q11 · 5 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
Study the imaginary data for three countries.
Country L: per capita income 14,000 US dollars; life expectancy 68 years; mean years of schooling 5
Country M: per capita income 9,000 US dollars; life expectancy 76 years; mean years of schooling 10
Country N: per capita income 2,000 US dollars; life expectancy 62 years; mean years of schooling 3.5
(a) Using the World Bank income limits given in the NCERT text, which of these countries would be called a low-income country? (1 mark)
(b) Which country is likely to be the most developed in human terms? Give two reasons. (2 marks)
(c) What does this data show about the difference between the World Bank and UNDP criteria? (2 marks)Hint
Compare N with the low-income limit, then read health and schooling separately from income.
Answer
(a) Country N, because its per capita income of 2,000 US dollars is below the limit of about 2,300 US dollars.
(b) Country M. Its people live longest (76 years against 68 and 62), and it has the most schooling (10 years against 5 and 3.5), even though L earns more.
(c) The World Bank uses per capita income alone, so L would look ahead of M. UNDP's Human Development Report combines education, health and income, so M is likely to rank higher. The data shows that income alone does not reveal people's well-being.Q12 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Imagine a town where the shared water supply is unreliable, so every household digs its own borewell. Each year the borewells must go deeper. Using the ideas of public facilities and sustainability, explain why this is happening and suggest a better way. (3 marks)
Hint
Think about what happens when each family acts alone, and what rain can put back.
Answer
- When each family arranges water alone, it costs more and nobody controls total use, so more and more water is pumped out.
- Groundwater is renewable, but it is overused when use exceeds what rain replenishes, so the level keeps falling.
- A reliable supply arranged for the whole town can be cheaper, like collective security, and can keep total use within what rain puts back, so water lasts for future residents.
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.What is per capita income?Show answer
Total income of a country divided by its total population; also called average income.
2.Which body uses per capita income to classify countries, and in which report?Show answer
The World Bank, in its World Development Reports.
3.What three things does the Human Development Report compare?Show answer
Educational levels of people, their health status and per capita income.
4.Define Infant Mortality Rate.Show answer
Number of children dying before the age of one per 1,000 live births in that year.
5.Which neighbour of India is ahead of it on every item in Table 1.6?Show answer
Sri Lanka (HDI rank 89 against India's 130).
6.Why does Kerala have a low IMR?Show answer
Because it has adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities.
7.Give one renewable and one non-renewable resource from the chapter.Show answer
Renewable: groundwater. Non-renewable: crude oil.
8.How is BMI calculated?Show answer
Weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres.
Best order to study it
- Start with Different People, Different Goals and Income and Other Goals: learn the examples of the labourer, the Punjab farmer, the girl and the dam.
- Move to National Development: note the questions of fairness, benefit to many and a better way.
- Learn per capita income, the World Bank classification and the Country A and B table, and practise average and missing-income calculations.
- Study the Haryana, Kerala and Bihar tables and the terms IMR, literacy rate and Net Attendance Ratio, then Public Facilities with the PDS example.
- Learn the Human Development Report, Table 1.6 comparisons and BMI.
- Finish with Sustainability of Development: groundwater, crude oil, renewable and non-renewable resources, and write one 5-mark answer within 120 words.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- Can you give two examples of conflicting development goals from the chapter?
- Can you list four non-material goals people seek besides income?
- Can you explain why total income is not used to compare countries?
- Can you state the World Bank income limits for high and low income countries and India's category?
- Can you find the missing income when an average and three of four incomes are given?
- Can you explain what the Country A and Country B table shows about averages?
- Can you define IMR, literacy rate and Net Attendance Ratio, and say which way is better for each?
- Can you explain, using data, why Kerala is ahead of Haryana in health and education?
- Can you write the difference between the World Bank and UNDP criteria in two lines?
- Can you explain why groundwater overuse and crude oil exhaustion make development unsustainable?
Development: frequently asked questions
Do I need to memorise all the numbers in the tables of the Development chapter?
The textbook says terms like IMR and literacy rate are an aid to discussion, not something to be memorised. When a question is based on data, the table is printed for you. Still, knowing the broad pattern, such as Kerala's low IMR and Sri Lanka's lead over India, helps you write stronger answers.
What is the difference between different and conflicting development goals?
Different goals simply means people want different things, like a labourer wanting better wages and a girl wanting equal freedom. Conflicting goals means one person's gain harms another. A big dam that gives electricity to industry but displaces tribals is the clearest example.
Is per capita income a good measure of development?
It is useful because it lets you compare countries with different populations. But it hides how income is distributed and does not show health, education or public facilities. That is why the UNDP adds health and education to income.
Why is Sri Lanka ranked higher than India in human development?
In the Human Development Report data for 2023, Sri Lanka is ahead of India in per capita income, life expectancy and mean years of schooling. So its HDI rank is 89 while India's is 130, out of 193 countries.
Is BMI part of this chapter for the board exam?
BMI appears in the chapter as an activity on checking whether people are properly nourished. The syllabus sets no limit that removes it, so learn the method: weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres, and what a low or high value shows.
Are there any map questions from the Development chapter?
No. The official map list has no items for this chapter, so you will not be asked to locate anything on a map from it.
Based on: CBSE Social Science (087) syllabus 2026-27; NCERT Understanding Economic Development (Economics), Reprint 2026-27