Skip to content
Social ScienceCBSE Class 8 · Chapter 11

The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society Class 8: Notes and Questions

Updated 15 October 2026 · Fact-checked

The judiciary is the independent branch of government that settles disputes fairly according to law and checks that laws and government actions stay within the Constitution. India has a unified hierarchy of courts: the Supreme Court, High Courts and subordinate courts, plus tribunals and alternative methods such as arbitration, mediation and Lok Adalats.

What The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society is about

This 'Governance and Democracy' chapter of Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Part 2 was rewritten in 2026 (NCERT Reprint 2026-27). It opens with Martin Luther King Jr.: injustice anywhere threatens justice everywhere. The Big Questions: what justice is, why it matters for a harmonious society, the structure and role of India's judiciary, and alternative modes of resolving disputes.

You will study:

  • Justice and law: the Preamble's promise of social, economic and political justice; laws and their consequences; the repeal of over 1,500 colonial-era laws (e.g. the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871; the Vernacular Press Act, 1878); unjust laws abroad (Jim Crow, apartheid).
  • Substantive and procedural justice; 'innocent until proved guilty'.
  • The Supreme Court: establishment, strength, appointment, qualifications, retirement; writ, PIL, original, appellate, advisory and special leave jurisdictions; Articles 141, 142, 144.
  • High Courts (25 for 28 states), subordinate courts and tribunals (consumer case example).
  • New criminal laws (2023) and digital initiatives.
  • Alternative dispute resolution: arbitration, mediation, Lok Adalats, Gram Nyayalayas.

CBSE sets no Class 8 paper; your school sets the exam. Learn the Articles carefully; they are easy to mix up.

Weightage: CBSE sets no Class 8 Social Science paper or marks: Class 8 is assessed by your school, which teaches from NCERT Exploring Society: India and Beyond. School papers usually mix MCQs, short answers (2-3 marks), source or picture-based questions and longer answers (5 marks).Source: docs/research/cbse-8-2026-27.md (NCERT book list, Reprint 2026-27)

Key concepts

Justice, law and the judiciary
NCERT section The Connection Between Law and Justice

The Preamble promises all citizens social, economic and political justice. Justice keeps peace and harmony and lets people live with equality and dignity.

The judiciary is one of the three pillars of government, independent of the legislature and executive. It ensures fair adjudication of disputes according to law, checks that laws passed by the legislature fit the Constitution, and that the executive does not overstep its role. Disputes may also be settled by dialogue, mediation or court adjudication.

Laws: general rules made by the government to regulate people's activities, with consequences for breaking them (a fine, compensation, even imprisonment). The judicial system lets an aggrieved person complain and both sides be heard, so that justice is done within the law and the Constitution.

Unjust laws repealed: after Independence, hundreds of colonial laws were found discriminatory; the government has repealed over 1,500 of them, for example the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 (branded communities criminal by birth) and the Vernacular Press Act, 1878 (restricted the press). Abroad: the Jim Crow laws in parts of the USA (segregated facilities; repealed in the 1960s) and apartheid laws in South Africa (repealed in 1991).

Worked example

Why were laws like the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 repealed after Independence? (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. It labelled certain communities criminals by birth: discriminatory.
  2. Inconsistent with justice, equality and India as a democratic republic.

Answer: The Criminal Tribes Act labelled certain communities as criminals by birth, which was discriminatory and against equality and dignity. Such colonial laws were inconsistent with the principles of justice of a democratic republic, so they were repealed (over 1,500 colonial-era laws in all).

Substantive and procedural justice
NCERT section The Connection Between Law and Justice

When we suffer injustice we may want punishment, an apology or compensation; the accused wants a chance to explain. This gives two aspects of justice:

AspectFocusQuestion asked
Substantive justicethe final outcomeIs the decision actually fair, just and reasonable?
Procedural justicethe processDid every person get a full opportunity of hearing before the court decided?

A basic rule: every person is presumed innocent until proved guilty.

Worked example

A teacher punishes a student for breaking a window without hearing the student, though the punishment is mild. Which aspect of justice is missing? (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Outcome may seem reasonable (mild).
  2. No hearing: procedural justice missing; also presumption of innocence ignored.

Answer: Procedural justice is missing: the student was not given a full opportunity to be heard before the decision. Even a mild punishment is not fully just if the person was presumed guilty without a hearing.

The Supreme Court: structure and appointment
NCERT section The Judicial System in India; The Supreme Court of India

India's judiciary is a unified system: Supreme Court at the apex, High Courts at the state level, subordinate courts at the district level.

Supreme Court of India:

  • Highest court; came into existence on 26 January 1950, when the Constitution took effect; seated in New Delhi; established under Article 124.
  • Final interpreter of the Constitution.
  • Motto: 'yato dharmastato jayah' ('Where there is dharma, there is victory').
  • Head: the Chief Justice of India; strength 33 + 1 (CJI and 33 judges).
  • Judges are appointed by the President (Article 124).
  • Qualifications: a citizen of India who has been (i) a High Court judge for 5 years, or (ii) a High Court advocate for 10 years, or (iii) a distinguished jurist in the President's opinion.
  • Retirement at 65.

Worked example

State the three alternative qualifications for appointment as a Supreme Court judge. (3 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Citizen of India, and:
  2. High Court judge for five years; or High Court advocate for ten years;
  3. or a distinguished jurist in the President's opinion.

Answer: The person must be an Indian citizen and, in addition, must have (i) served five years as a High Court judge, or (ii) practised for ten years as a High Court advocate, or (iii) be, in the President's opinion, a distinguished jurist.

Writs and Public Interest Litigation
NCERT section Writ Jurisdiction; Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

Writ jurisdiction lets the constitutional courts enforce Fundamental Rights (Part III: equality, liberty, right to life, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and others).

  • Article 32: file a writ petition directly in the Supreme Court, where the issue has an all-India impact.
  • Article 226: file in the High Court, for violations within the state's territory.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) (under Articles 32 and 226): an innovation by the Supreme Court to take up matters of public concern and give meaning to the Right to Life (Article 21).

  • First reported PIL: lawyer Kapila Hingorani read that under-trial prisoners in Bihar had been jailed longer than their sentence would have been if convicted; the Court ordered their release and issued guidelines to release almost 40,000 under-trials across India.
  • M.C. Mehta v. Union of India: environmental issues such as cleaning the Ganga and protecting the Taj Mahal.
  • Vishaka & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan (1997): guidelines against sexual harassment at the workplace; later the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013.

Worked example

What was the first reported PIL and what did it achieve? (3 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Kapila Hingorani read about under-trial prisoners in Bihar jailed longer than possible sentences.
  2. Filed a writ petition for their release.
  3. Supreme Court ordered release and guidelines for almost 40,000 under-trials across India.

Answer: Lawyer Kapila Hingorani read in a newspaper that under-trial prisoners in Bihar had spent longer in jail than their punishment would have been if found guilty. She filed a writ petition for their release; the Supreme Court ordered them freed and issued guidelines leading to the release of almost 40,000 under-trial prisoners across India.

Other jurisdictions and powers of the Supreme Court
NCERT section Original, Appellate and Advisory Jurisdiction; Special Leave Petitions
JurisdictionArticleWhat it covers
Original (exclusive)131disputes between the Centre and a State; Centre and a State vs another State; between States (e.g. river water)
Appellate132, 133, 134, 134Aappeals from High Court final orders certified as involving the Constitution or a substantial question of law; criminal cases with death sentence or certified fit; appeals from tribunals like NGT and NCLAT
Advisory143the President may seek the Court's opinion on law or fact of public importance; heard by a Constitution Bench of at least five judges
Special Leave136discretionary power to allow appeal from any court or tribunal on a question of general public importance, or to do substantive justice

Other powers:

  • Article 141: law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts in India.
  • Article 142: it may pass any order needed for complete justice.
  • Article 144: all civil and judicial authorities must act in aid of the Supreme Court.

Worked example

Two states quarrel over sharing a river's water. Which jurisdiction of the Supreme Court applies, and under which Article? (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Dispute between states = original (exclusive) jurisdiction.
  2. Article 131.

Answer: Original (exclusive) jurisdiction under Article 131, which covers inter-state disputes such as river water disputes; the case goes directly to the Supreme Court.

High Courts and subordinate courts
NCERT section High Court; Subordinate Courts

High Court: highest court at the state level; Article 214: a High Court for each state. India has 28 states but 25 High Courts, because some states and UTs share one (e.g. Bombay: Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu; Gauhati: Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh; Punjab & Haryana: both states and Chandigarh; Calcutta also covers Andaman & Nicobar; Madras covers Puducherry; Kerala covers Lakshadweep). Several High Courts have more than one bench.

  • A Chief Justice and other judges (number varies).
  • Appointed by the President in consultation with the CJI, the state Governor and the High Court Chief Justice.
  • Qualifications (Article 217(2)): citizen; held a judicial office in India or been a High Court advocate for 10 years. Retire at 62.
  • Jurisdiction: within its territory; writs (Article 226); appeals from subordinate courts (civil and criminal) and certain tribunals; superintendence over all courts and tribunals in its territory (Article 227), used sparingly. Writ and supervisory powers are part of the Constitution's basic structure.

Subordinate courts (Articles 233-237): District Courts, Sessions Courts, Revenue Courts, Small Causes Courts; where the judiciary meets ordinary people most closely. District Judges are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the High Court (Article 233). Each High Court must uphold the honour and integrity of its subordinate judiciary.

Worked example

Compare Supreme Court and High Court judges on appointment and retirement age. (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Both appointed by the President (HC: in consultation with CJI, Governor, HC Chief Justice).
  2. Retirement: SC 65; HC 62.

Answer: Both are appointed by the President; High Court judges are appointed in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the state Governor and the High Court's Chief Justice. Supreme Court judges retire at 65, High Court judges at 62.

Tribunals, new laws and digital justice
NCERT section Tribunals; Digital Technology and Judicial System

Tribunals: specialised, quasi-judicial bodies set up under various laws to decide particular kinds of disputes:

TribunalDecides
Consumer fora/commissionsconsumer disputes
Central Administrative Tribunalservice matters of government employees
National Green Tribunalenvironmental issues
NCLTcorporate and commercial disputes, insolvency and bankruptcy
Armed Forces Tribunalarmed forces disputes
APTELelectricity disputes

Example: a family paid an advance of almost ₹65 lakh for a flat; after four years no building had come up; the National Consumer Commission heard both sides and ordered the builder to refund with interest and pay litigation costs.

New criminal laws (2023): Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; aims: faster justice, digital evidence, better victim protection, a modern and transparent system.

Digital technology: litigants can check their own case details; orders and judgments freely available in many languages; e-Filing, hybrid hearings, live streaming, translation of judgments, the National Judicial Data Grid; since 2024-25 a 'Virtual Justice Clock' screen at the Supreme Court gates shows real-time data.

Worked example

Which three colonial-era laws were replaced in 2023, and by what? (3 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. IPC 1860 → Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  2. CrPC 1973 → Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  3. Indian Evidence Act 1872 → Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Answer: The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita; and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, all in 2023.

Alternative modes of dispute resolution
NCERT section Alternate Modes of Dispute Resolution

To reduce the burden on courts, litigants are encouraged to use arbitration, mediation/conciliation, negotiation, Lok Adalats, etc.

ModeHow it worksDecisionLaw
Arbitrationparties refer the dispute to an independent arbitrator or panel (retired judge, lawyer, expert) who must be fair and hear both sidesfinal, legally binding, enforceable by courtsArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Mediation (most common ADR)a neutral mediator helps parties reach a mutual settlementmediator cannot decide or impose a viewMediation Act, 2023
Lok Adalats'people's courts' that settle cases amicably, pending in courts or even before filingsettlementLegal Services Authorities Act, 1987
Gram Nyayalayasmobile, village-level courts with simplified procedurecourt decisionGram Nyayalayas Act, 2008

Citizens also help the judiciary by bringing to its notice social concerns affecting the rights of people, animals and nature.

Worked example

Distinguish between arbitration and mediation. (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Arbitration: arbitrator decides; binding and enforceable.
  2. Mediation: mediator only helps parties agree; cannot impose a decision.

Answer: In arbitration, an independent arbitrator hears both sides and gives a decision that is final, legally binding and enforceable by a court. In mediation, a neutral mediator only helps the parties reach their own settlement and has no power to impose a decision.

The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society in real life

Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.

Consumer justice through tribunals

Suppose your family pays for a washing machine online, but the seller never delivers and ignores your calls for months.

Where could your family seek justice, and what might the outcome be?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Consumer disputes go to consumer fora/commissions (tribunals).
  2. Both sides are heard (procedural justice).
  3. Remedy may include refund, interest and costs, as in the flat-buyer case.

Answer: Your family could approach a consumer forum or commission, a specialised tribunal for consumer disputes. After hearing both sides, it can order a refund with interest and costs, just as the National Consumer Commission ordered the builder who failed to build a flat to refund the family.

Memory hook: Cheated as a buyer? Go to the consumer forum.

Mediation vs arbitration

Imagine two neighbours quarrel over a shared wall. One suggests a respected elder help them talk; the other suggests a retired judge decide and both accept the decision.

Which modes of dispute resolution are these, and how do they differ?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Elder helping them agree = mediation.
  2. Retired judge deciding with binding result = arbitration.
  3. Mediator cannot impose; arbitrator's award is binding.

Answer: The elder helping them reach an agreement is mediation: the mediator cannot impose a decision. The retired judge deciding the matter, with both bound by it, is arbitration: the award is final, binding and enforceable by courts. Both reduce the burden on courts.

Memory hook: Mediator helps; arbitrator decides.

PIL and the right to life

Suppose dust from a stone-crushing unit next to your school covers the playground every day, and many children start coughing and missing classes.

How could parents use the judicial system to protect the children?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Clean air and health are linked to the Right to Life (Article 21).
  2. PIL or writ in the High Court (Art. 226) or Supreme Court (Art. 32); or the National Green Tribunal for environmental issues.
  3. Precedent: M.C. Mehta's cases on environmental issues such as protecting the Taj Mahal.

Answer: Polluted air that harms children's health threatens their Right to Life, so the parents (or a lawyer acting for them) could file a PIL or writ petition in the High Court under Article 226, or approach the National Green Tribunal, which decides environmental issues. Courts have acted on pollution before, as in M.C. Mehta's cases on cleaning the Ganga and protecting the Taj Mahal.

Memory hook: Public harm, public interest litigation.

Topics in this chapter

The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society: key facts

Court hierarchy
  1. 1.Supreme Court (apex)
  2. 2.High Courts (state)
  3. 3.Subordinate courts (district: District, Sessions, Revenue, Small Causes) | + tribunals
A unified system.
Supreme Court Articles
124establishment and appointment
32 writs
131original
132-134A appeals
136special leave
141binding law
142complete justice
143advisory (5-judge bench)
144authorities must aid
High Court and lower court Articles
214HC in each state
217qualifications, retirement
226writs
227superintendence
233-237subordinate courts (233: Governor appoints District Judges)
Judges compared
SC judgesCJI + 33
SC qualification5 yrs HC judge / 10 yrs HC advocate / distinguished jurist
SC retirement65
HC qualificationjudicial office or 10 yrs advocate
HC retirement62
ADR laws
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
  • Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (Lok Adalats)
  • Gram Nyayalayas Act 2008
  • Mediation Act 2023
Dates
  • SC from 26.01.1950
  • Vishaka 1997 → Act 2013
  • Jim Crow repealed 1960s
  • Apartheid laws repealed 1991
  • New criminal laws 2023
  • Over 1,500 colonial laws repealed

How the school exam asks The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society

The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.

Question typeHow it is askedMethod
Match Article to powerWhich Article gives writ power to the Supreme Court? Which covers advisory jurisdiction?Learn the Articles table; link each to one keyword (32 writ, 131 states, 143 President, 136 special leave).
Which court or body?Scenarios: inter-state river dispute, consumer complaint, government employee's service matter, village land quarrel.Identify the type of dispute, then the right forum (SC original, consumer commission, CAT, Gram Nyayalaya or Lok Adalat).
Concepts of justiceSubstantive vs procedural justice; presumption of innocence.Outcome vs process, with a small example.
Case-basedKapila Hingorani PIL; M.C. Mehta; Vishaka; the flat-buyer case; Anita and Sameer's unequal pay; a polluted river.Name the right violated, the remedy (writ, PIL, tribunal) and the likely outcome.
EvaluativeHow to reduce pending cases; why an independent judiciary matters; role of citizens.Use ADR, digital initiatives, Gram Nyayalayas and PIL as solutions.

Tricks to remember The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society

Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.

  • Key Supreme Court Articles

    '32 Writes, 131 Settles States, 136 Specially Leaves, 141 Binds, 142 Completes, 143 Advises'.

    Use it when: Articles and powers.

  • Retirement ages

    'Supreme 65, High 62': the higher court retires later.

    Use it when: Judges' tenure.

  • Two kinds of justice

    'Substantive = Score (result); Procedural = Process (hearing)'.

    Use it when: Aspects of justice.

  • ADR years

    'Lok 87, Arbitration 96, Gram 08, Mediation 23'.

    Use it when: ADR laws.

  • New laws

    'Nyaya for Penal, Nagarik Suraksha for Procedure, Sakshya for Evidence' (all 2023).

    Use it when: 2023 replacements.

The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society: exam-level solved questions

Ordered from exam level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.

Example 1: Highest court of a state · 1 mark · MCQExam level

Which Article provides for a High Court in each State?
(a) Article 124 (b) Article 214 (c) Article 32 (d) Article 233

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. 124: Supreme Court; 32: writs; 233: District Judges.

Answer: (b) Article 214

Example 2: Binding law · 1 mark · MCQExam level

The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts in India under:
(a) Article 141 (b) Article 142 (c) Article 143 (d) Article 144

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. 141 = binding; 142 complete justice; 143 advisory; 144 aid.

Answer: (a) Article 141

Example 3: Assertion-reason: PIL · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder exam level

Assertion (A): Public Interest Litigation helps people who cannot easily reach the courts themselves.
Reason (R): The first reported PIL led to guidelines for releasing almost 40,000 under-trial prisoners.
(a) Both true, R explains A (b) Both true, R does not explain A (c) A true, R false (d) A false, R true

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Both true; the Hingorani case is an example of a lawyer acting for prisoners who could not act themselves, so R supports A.

Answer: (a) Both true and R explains A.

Example 4: Choose the forum · 2 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

Match each dispute to the right forum: (i) a government clerk's promotion dispute (ii) a company's insolvency (iii) illegal dumping in a wetland (iv) a dispute between two states over river water. (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. (i) CAT; (ii) NCLT; (iii) NGT; (iv) Supreme Court original jurisdiction.

Answer: (i) Central Administrative Tribunal. (ii) National Company Law Tribunal. (iii) National Green Tribunal. (iv) Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction (Article 131).

Example 5: Two aspects of justice · 3 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

Explain substantive and procedural justice, and why both are needed. (3 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Substantive: fair, just, reasonable outcome.
  2. Procedural: full hearing for every party before decision; innocent until proved guilty.
  3. Both: a fair result reached unfairly, or a fair process with an unjust result, both fail.

Answer: Substantive justice asks whether the final decision is fair, just and reasonable. Procedural justice means every party gets a full opportunity to be heard before the court decides, and everyone is presumed innocent until proved guilty. Both are needed: a fair-looking result without a hearing cannot be trusted, and a fair hearing that ends in an unreasonable decision is not just either.

Example 6: Unjust laws compared · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

What do the Criminal Tribes Act (India), the Jim Crow laws (USA) and apartheid (South Africa) have in common, and what does their repeal show? (3 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. All discriminated by birth, colour or race.
  2. Denied dignity and equal access.
  3. Repeal: laws must reflect justice and equality; democracies correct unjust laws.

Answer: All three were laws that discriminated against people by birth, colour or race: branding communities criminals by birth, or denying people access to public facilities. They denied equality and dignity. Their repeal (India after Independence, the USA in the 1960s, South Africa in 1991) shows that law is not automatically just, and that democratic societies must review and remove unjust laws.

Example 7: Long answer: access to justice · 5 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency

'Courts alone cannot deliver justice to a country of India's size.' Discuss how the Indian system tries to make justice accessible. (5 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Huge caseload; need for many routes.
  2. Hierarchy: SC, HCs, subordinate courts close to people.
  3. PIL and writs; tribunals for specialised disputes.
  4. ADR: arbitration, mediation, Lok Adalats, Gram Nyayalayas.
  5. Digital: e-filing, live streaming, translations, NJDG; citizens' role.

Answer: India's courts handle a huge number of cases, so the system uses several routes to justice. A three-level hierarchy brings courts close to people through subordinate courts, with High Courts and the Supreme Court above. Writs and PIL let anyone, even on behalf of others, seek protection of rights, as in Kapila Hingorani's case. Specialised tribunals such as consumer commissions and the NGT decide particular disputes faster. Alternative modes like arbitration, mediation, Lok Adalats and mobile Gram Nyayalayas settle disputes without full trials. Digital initiatives like e-filing, live streaming, translated judgments and the National Judicial Data Grid make the system transparent. Citizens also help by raising social concerns. Together these widen access beyond the courtroom.

Case-study practice (Section E style)

Read the situation, then answer every part. In a school exam set on the board pattern this is a 4-mark question split into 1 + 1 + 2 marks.

The flat that never came

In 2011 a family paid an advance of almost ₹65 lakh for a flat in a planned complex. Four years later there was still no sign of the building. The family complained to the National Consumer Commission, which heard both the family and the builder.

  1. (i) · 1 mark

    What kind of body is the National Consumer Commission? (1 mark)

    Answer

    Answer: A tribunal (consumer forum) that decides consumer disputes; quasi-judicial.

  2. (ii) · 1 mark

    What did the Commission order? (1 mark)

    Answer

    Answer: The builder had to return the amount with interest and pay the cost of the litigation.

  3. (iii) · 2 marks

    Which aspects of justice does this case show? Explain. (2 marks)

    Answer

    Answer: Procedural justice: both parties were heard before the decision. Substantive justice: the outcome (refund with interest and costs) was fair to the family that had been wronged.

Where the marks are

How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.

What is the advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? (2 marks) (2 marks)

StepMarks
The President may seek the Court's opinion on a question of law or fact of public importance (Article 143).1
Such references are heard by a Constitution Bench of at least five judges.1

Explain the role and powers of a High Court. (3 marks) (3 marks)

StepMarks
Highest court in a state (Art. 214); writ jurisdiction (Art. 226) within its territory.1
Hears appeals from subordinate courts in civil and criminal matters and from certain tribunals.1
Superintendence over all courts and tribunals in its territory (Art. 227), used sparingly; part of the basic structure.1

Describe the structure and jurisdictions of the Supreme Court of India. (5 marks) (5 marks)

StepMarks
Apex of a unified system; established under Art. 124 on 26.01.1950; CJI + 33 judges; appointed by President; retire at 65.1
Writ jurisdiction (Art. 32) and PIL for Fundamental Rights.1
Original jurisdiction (Art. 131): Centre-state and inter-state disputes.1
Appellate (Arts. 132-134A), special leave (Art. 136), advisory (Art. 143).1
Its law binds all courts (Art. 141); complete justice (Art. 142); authorities must aid it (Art. 144).1

Where students lose marks in The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society

The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.

  • Mistake: Mixing up Article 32 and Article 226

    Both are writ powers.

    Wrong working

    Article 226 lets citizens approach the Supreme Court for writs.

    Right working

    Article 32: Supreme Court (all-India issues); Article 226: High Court (within the state).

    Do this: Smaller number, higher court.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Saying mediators give binding decisions

    Confusing mediation with arbitration.

    Wrong working

    The mediator decides the case and both parties must obey.

    Right working

    A mediator only helps parties reach a settlement; an arbitrator's decision is binding.

    Do this: Mediator = helper; arbitrator = decider.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Assuming every state has its own High Court

    Article 214 says 'each State'.

    Wrong working

    India has 28 High Courts, one per state.

    Right working

    There are 25 High Courts; some states and UTs share one (e.g. Gauhati covers four states).

    Do this: Remember 28 states, 25 High Courts.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Wrong retirement ages or qualifications

    Similar numbers (5, 10, 62, 65).

    Wrong working

    Supreme Court judges retire at 62 after 5 years as advocates.

    Right working

    SC judges retire at 65; qualify after 5 years as an HC judge or 10 years as an HC advocate, or as a distinguished jurist.

    Do this: Make a two-column table.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Defining justice only as punishment

    Everyday idea of justice.

    Wrong working

    Justice means punishing the guilty.

    Right working

    Justice includes a fair outcome (substantive) and a fair process giving everyone a full hearing (procedural), with innocence presumed until guilt is proved.

    Do this: Mention both aspects.

    Usually costs: 1-2 marks.

NCERT exercise guide: The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society

What each exercise in the NCERT chapter tests, how to approach it, and a question of the same kind solved step by step. Questions here are written in our own words.

Questions and activities 1 and 2: letter to a court; reducing pending cases

What it tests: Writing a model letter about a social issue to a High Court or the Supreme Court; innovative ways to handle the large number of cases.

How to approach it: For the letter, state the issue, the right affected and the relief sought. For solutions, use ADR, Gram Nyayalayas and digital tools from the chapter.

Same kind as question 2

Suggest three ways the legislature or executive could reduce the number of cases pending in courts.

Show the solutionSolution
  1. Promote ADR: Lok Adalats, mediation, arbitration.
  2. Expand Gram Nyayalayas for simple village disputes.
  3. Use digital tools: e-filing, hybrid hearings, data grid to track delays; repeal outdated laws.

Answer: 1. Encourage alternative dispute resolution through more Lok Adalats and mediation centres, so many cases settle without full trials. 2. Set up more Gram Nyayalayas to decide simple village disputes quickly with simplified procedure. 3. Expand digital initiatives such as e-filing, hybrid hearings and the National Judicial Data Grid to speed up processes and spot delays, and keep repealing outdated laws.

Questions and activities 3-5: moot court cases, a judge's biography, interviewing someone in the judicial system

What it tests: Anita and Sameer's unequal pay; villagers and a polluting factory; an eminent judge from your state; a presentation on judicial work.

How to approach it: In moot courts, present both sides (procedural justice) before deciding a fair outcome (substantive justice).

Same kind as question 3(i)

Fatima and Joseph are laboratory assistants in the same hospital, with the same qualification and the same duties, but Fatima is paid less. If she goes to court, what should the judge consider, and what might the outcome be?

Show the solutionSolution
  1. Procedural justice: hear both sides, Fatima's evidence (same qualification, same duties) and the employer's reasons.
  2. Right to Equality: no discrimination by sex for the same work.
  3. Substantive justice: likely order of equal pay, possibly with arrears.

Answer: The judge would first hear both sides: Fatima's evidence that she has the same qualification and does the same work, and any reasons the employer gives. If there is no valid reason and she is paid less only because she is a woman, it violates the Right to Equality. A just outcome would be an order to pay her equally, possibly with the arrears she lost.

Practice questions on The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society

Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.

  1. Q1 · 1 mark · MCQExam level

    At what age does a High Court judge retire?
    (a) 60 (b) 62 (c) 65 (d) 70

    Hint

    Lower than Supreme Court.

    Answer

    (b) 62

  2. Q2 · 1 mark · Very short answerExam level

    Which Article gives the Supreme Court power to pass any order for complete justice?

    Hint

    Between 141 and 143.

    Answer

    Article 142.

  3. Q3 · 1 mark · Very short answerExam level

    Name the law under which arbitration is conducted in India.

    Hint

    1996.

    Answer

    The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

  4. Q4 · 1 mark · Very short answerExam level

    Which High Court covers Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh?

    Hint

    Guwahati.

    Answer

    The Gauhati High Court.

  5. Q5 · 2 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    What is a Special Leave Petition?

    Hint

    Article 136.

    Answer

    Under Article 136, the Supreme Court has a discretionary power to grant special leave to appeal from any judgment or order of any court or tribunal in India, where a question of law of general public importance arises or to do substantive justice.

  6. Q6 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    How do digital initiatives make the judiciary more transparent? Give three examples.

    Hint

    Litigants and public.

    Answer

    Litigants can check their own case details online rather than relying only on lawyers; judgments are freely available and translated into many Indian languages; court proceedings are live-streamed (also: e-filing, hybrid hearings, the National Judicial Data Grid and the Virtual Justice Clock).

  7. Q7 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder exam level

    Assertion (A): A mediator cannot impose a decision on the parties.
    Reason (R): Mediation aims at a mutual settlement reached by the parties themselves.
    (a) Both true, R explains A (b) Both true, R does not explain A (c) A true, R false (d) A false, R true

    Hint

    Nature of mediation.

    Answer

    (a) Both true and R explains A.

  8. Q8 · 2 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    Why is the subordinate judiciary called a very important part of the judicial system?

    Hint

    Contact with people.

    Answer

    Because it is in district, sessions, revenue and small causes courts that the judiciary comes into closest contact with ordinary people; most citizens' cases start and are decided there.

  9. Q9 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    Suppose a news report says hundreds of people in a state have been in jail for years awaiting trial. Using the chapter, what could a concerned lawyer do and what precedent exists?

    Hint

    First PIL.

    Answer

    The lawyer could file a PIL (writ petition) in the High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32, citing the Right to Life (Article 21). The precedent is Kapila Hingorani's PIL, after which the Supreme Court ordered the release of under-trials in Bihar and issued guidelines leading to the release of almost 40,000 across India.

  10. Q10 · 2 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    Why do you think writ and supervisory jurisdiction of High Courts has been declared part of the Constitution's 'basic structure'?

    Hint

    Protection of rights.

    Answer

    These powers let citizens enforce Fundamental Rights and keep lower courts and tribunals within their authority; treating them as basic structure protects them from being taken away, so rights remain enforceable everywhere.

  11. Q11 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    Lok Adalats are called 'people's courts'. Evaluate two advantages and one limitation.

    Hint

    Amicable settlement.

    Answer

    Advantages: they settle disputes amicably and quickly without the rigours of formal trials, and they reduce the backlog of pending cases (they can even take disputes before they reach court). Limitation: since they depend on agreement, they suit disputes that can be compromised; serious matters needing a formal decision still need regular courts. (Reasoned answers accepted.)

  12. Q12 · 5 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency

    'An independent judiciary is essential for democracy.' Explain with reference to the chapter.

    Hint

    Checks, rights, fairness.

    Answer

    The judiciary is one of the three pillars of government and is kept independent of the legislature and executive. This independence lets it decide disputes fairly, including disputes involving the government itself, such as Centre-state cases under Article 131. It checks that laws passed by the legislature fit the Constitution and that the executive does not overstep, as the final interpreter of the Constitution. It protects Fundamental Rights through writs and PIL, as when under-trial prisoners were freed or workplace harassment guidelines were laid down. Without independence, powerful parties could influence verdicts and citizens would lose a fair forum, so democracy and the rule of law depend on it.

Test your recall

Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.

  1. 1.What kinds of justice does the Preamble promise?Show answer

    Social, economic and political justice.

  2. 2.When did the Supreme Court come into existence?Show answer

    26 January 1950.

  3. 3.What is the Supreme Court's motto?Show answer

    'Yato dharmastato jayah': where there is dharma, there is victory.

  4. 4.What is the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court?Show answer

    33 + 1 (33 judges and the Chief Justice of India).

  5. 5.Who appoints Supreme Court judges?Show answer

    The President of India (Article 124).

  6. 6.Who filed the first reported PIL?Show answer

    Lawyer Kapila Hingorani, for under-trial prisoners in Bihar.

  7. 7.What did the Vishaka case (1997) lead to?Show answer

    Guidelines against sexual harassment at the workplace, and later the 2013 Act.

  8. 8.Which Article lets the President seek the Supreme Court's opinion?Show answer

    Article 143 (heard by at least five judges).

  9. 9.How many High Courts does India have?Show answer

    25.

  10. 10.Who appoints District Judges?Show answer

    The Governor, in consultation with the High Court (Article 233).

  11. 11.Under which law do Lok Adalats work?Show answer

    The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

  12. 12.What are Gram Nyayalayas?Show answer

    Mobile village-level courts under the 2008 Act with simplified procedure.

Best order to study it

  1. Read the Preamble's promise and the link between law and justice.
  2. Learn substantive vs procedural justice.
  3. Supreme Court: facts, appointment, qualifications, retirement.
  4. Make a table of jurisdictions with Articles; learn the PIL cases.
  5. High Courts and subordinate courts; tribunals and the consumer case.
  6. New 2023 laws, digital initiatives, ADR methods; then practise scenario questions.

Quick revision checklist

The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?

  • Judiciary: independent pillar; fair adjudication; checks laws and executive against the Constitution.
  • Over 1,500 colonial laws repealed (Criminal Tribes Act, Vernacular Press Act).
  • Substantive (fair outcome) vs procedural (full hearing) justice; innocent until proved guilty.
  • Unified hierarchy: SC → HCs → subordinate courts.
  • SC: 26.01.1950, Art. 124, CJI + 33, appointed by President, retire at 65.
  • Writs: Art. 32 (SC), Art. 226 (HC) for Fundamental Rights.
  • PIL: Kapila Hingorani (about 40,000 under-trials released), M.C. Mehta, Vishaka.
  • Original 131, appellate 132-134A, special leave 136, binding 141, complete justice 142, advisory 143, aid 144.
  • 25 HCs for 28 states; HC judges retire at 62; Art. 227 superintendence.
  • Subordinate courts: Arts. 233-237; Governor appoints District Judges.
  • Tribunals: consumer, CAT, NGT, NCLT, AFT, APTEL.
  • 2023 laws (BNS, BNSS, BSA); e-filing, live streaming, NJDG; ADR: arbitration, mediation, Lok Adalat, Gram Nyayalaya.

The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society: frequently asked questions

Is 'The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society' in the Class 8 syllabus for 2026-27?

Yes. It is Chapter 4 of Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Part 2 (Reprint 2026-27), Chapter 11 in our numbering. NCERT rewrote this chapter in 2026, so use the Reprint 2026-27 book.

What is the difference between a writ petition and a PIL?

A writ petition seeks enforcement of Fundamental Rights (Article 32 or 226). A PIL is a type of petition under the same Articles, filed for a matter of public concern, often by someone on behalf of those affected.

Is a tribunal a court?

Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies set up under specific laws to decide particular categories of disputes, such as consumer, environmental or service matters.

Why are alternative modes of dispute resolution encouraged?

They reduce the huge burden of cases on courts and often settle disputes faster and more amicably, for example through Lok Adalats or mediation.

Is the law declared by the Supreme Court binding on High Courts?

Yes. Under Article 141, the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts in India.

Based on: NCERT Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Grade 8 Part 2 (Reprint 2026-27); NCERT chapter PDF: The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society