The Crisis of Democratic Order, Class 12 Political Science
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
The Crisis of Democratic Order is Chapter 6 of Politics in India since Independence in Class 12 Political Science. It explains the economic and political background to the Emergency of 1975, the Gujarat and Bihar movements, conflict with the judiciary, the declaration and consequences of Emergency, its lessons, the 1977 election, the Janata government and its legacy.
What The Crisis of Democratic Order is about
We usually link an 'emergency' with war or natural disaster. But in June 1975 an Emergency was declared on the ground of a threat of internal disturbance. It ended as dramatically as it began, with the defeat of the Congress in the 1977 Lok Sabha elections.
The chapter covers:
1. Background to Emergency: the economic context, the Gujarat and Bihar movements, the railway strike of 1974, and conflict with the judiciary.
2. Declaration of Emergency: the Allahabad High Court verdict (12 June 1975), the crisis and the government's response under Article 352, and its consequences.
3. Lessons of the Emergency.
4. Politics after Emergency: the 1977 Lok Sabha elections, the Janata government and the 1980 election.
5. Legacy: changes in the party system.
(The section 'Controversies regarding Emergency' was dropped by NCERT and is not in the syllabus.)
Exam weight: this chapter carries 4 of the 80 theory marks. Expect correct-incorrect statements, odd-one-out and matching questions, 2-mark answers on preventive detention or the Shah Commission, and 4-mark answers on the lessons of Emergency or reasons for the 1977 result.
Weightage: Politics in India since Independence: The Crisis of Democratic Order carries 4 of the 80 theory marks.Source: CBSE Political Science (028) syllabus 2026-27, course structure
Key concepts
- Background: political and economic context
- NCERT section Background to Emergency; Economic Context
Political context: by the early 1970s Indira Gandhi was a towering, very popular leader. Party competition became bitter and polarised. The Supreme Court found many government initiatives unconstitutional; the Congress said the Court was against democracy and parliamentary supremacy, and a conservative obstacle to pro-poor programmes. Opponents felt politics was becoming too personalised and governmental authority was turning into personal authority.
Economic context:
- Despite 'garibi hatao', conditions did not improve much after 1971-72.
- The Bangladesh crisis strained the economy: about eight million people came into India from East Pakistan, followed by war.
- After the war the US stopped all aid.
- Oil prices rose manifold, pushing up all prices: inflation of 23 per cent in 1973 and 30 per cent in 1974.
- Low industrial growth; high unemployment, especially rural.
- The government froze salaries of its employees, causing dissatisfaction.
- Monsoons failed in 1972-73; food grain output fell by 8 per cent.
- Non-Congress parties organised effective protests; student unrest grew; armed Marxist-Leninist (Naxalite) groups, strong in West Bengal, rejected parliamentary politics.
Congress President D. K. Barooah's slogan (1974): 'Indira is India, India is Indira'.
Worked example
Describe the economic conditions that caused discontent in the early 1970s. (4 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Bangladesh crisis (about eight million refugees) and war strained the economy, and the US stopped all aid afterwards.
- A manifold rise in world oil prices led to inflation of 23 per cent in 1973 and 30 per cent in 1974.
- Industrial growth was low and unemployment high, especially in rural areas; government salaries were frozen.
- Monsoons failed in 1972-73 and food grain output fell by 8 per cent, so garibi hatao seemed unfulfilled.
Answer: War costs, loss of aid, oil-driven inflation, unemployment, salary freezes and a drought-hit harvest caused widespread discontent.
- Gujarat and Bihar movements and the railway strike
- NCERT section Gujarat and Bihar Movements; Railway Strike of 1974
Both Gujarat and Bihar were Congress-ruled states; student protests there shaped state and national politics.
Gujarat (January 1974):
- Students protested rising prices of food grains, cooking oil and essentials, and corruption in high places.
- Major opposition parties joined; President's rule was imposed.
- The opposition demanded fresh elections; Morarji Desai (Congress (O)) threatened an indefinite fast.
- Assembly elections were held in June 1975; the Congress was defeated.
Bihar (March 1974):
- Students protested rising prices, food scarcity, unemployment and corruption, and invited Jayaprakash Narayan (JP), who had left active politics for social work, to lead.
- JP accepted on condition the movement stay non-violent and not limited to Bihar; it became political with national appeal.
- JP demanded dismissal of the Bihar government and called for 'Total Revolution' (Sampoorna Kranti) in social, economic and political spheres to establish true democracy. Bandhs, gheraos and strikes followed; the government refused to resign.
- In 1975, JP led a people's march to Parliament, one of the largest rallies in the capital, supported by Bharatiya Jana Sangh, Congress (O), Bharatiya Lok Dal, Socialist Party and others, who projected JP as an alternative to Indira Gandhi.
- Critics questioned his ideas and the politics of mass agitation. The movements were seen as anti-Congress and against Indira Gandhi's leadership; she believed they were motivated by personal opposition to her.
Railway strike (May 1974): led by George Fernandes (National Coordination Committee for Railwaymen's Struggle) over bonus and service conditions. The government declared it illegal, arrested leaders, deployed the territorial army; it was called off after twenty days without settlement. It raised questions about workers' rights and strikes in essential services.
Worked example
What role did Jayaprakash Narayan play in the Bihar movement? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Invited by students in 1974, JP agreed to lead on the condition that the movement remain non-violent and spread beyond Bihar, giving it a national, political character.
- He demanded the dismissal of the Bihar government, called for 'Total Revolution', and in 1975 led a huge people's march to Parliament supported by opposition parties.
Answer: He led the movement non-violently, made it national, and called for Total Revolution.
- Conflict with the judiciary
- NCERT section Conflict with Judiciary
Three constitutional issues:
1. Can Parliament abridge Fundamental Rights? The Supreme Court said no.
2. Can Parliament curtail the right to property by amendment? Again, the Court said Parliament cannot amend the Constitution so as to curtail rights.
3. Parliament amended the Constitution to allow abridging Fundamental Rights to give effect to Directive Principles; the Court rejected this too.This crisis culminated in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973): the Court held that the Constitution has a basic structure that Parliament cannot amend.
Two more developments:
- Supersession (1973): breaking the practice of appointing the senior-most judge as Chief Justice, the government set aside three senior judges and appointed Justice A. N. Ray. It was controversial because the superseded judges had ruled against the government.
- People close to the PM spoke of a 'committed' judiciary and bureaucracy, loyal to the executive's vision.
- Climax: the High Court ruling declaring Indira Gandhi's election invalid.
Worked example
Why did the appointment of Justice A. N. Ray as Chief Justice in 1973 become controversial? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The usual practice was to appoint the senior-most Supreme Court judge as Chief Justice, but the government set aside the seniority of three judges.
- All three superseded judges had given rulings against the government's stand, so the move was seen as mixing constitutional interpretation with politics.
Answer: Because it broke the seniority convention and superseded judges who had ruled against the government.
- Declaration of Emergency
- NCERT section Declaration of Emergency; Crisis and Response
The Allahabad verdict:
- On 12 June 1975, Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha of the Allahabad High Court declared Indira Gandhi's Lok Sabha election invalid, on an election petition by Raj Narain (a socialist who had contested against her in 1971), on the ground that she had used government servants in her campaign.
- Legally she was no longer an MP and could stay PM only if re-elected within six months.
- On 24 June the Supreme Court gave a partial stay: until her appeal was decided she could remain an MP but not take part in Lok Sabha proceedings.
Crisis:
- The opposition, led by JP, demanded her resignation and held a massive rally at Delhi's Ramlila grounds on 25 June 1975.
- JP announced a nationwide satyagraha and asked the army, police and government employees not to obey 'illegal and immoral orders'.
Response:
- On 25 June 1975 the government invoked Article 352, which allows an emergency on grounds of external threat or internal disturbances. Technically this was within the government's powers.
- Effects of an emergency under the Constitution: federal distribution of powers is practically suspended and powers are concentrated in the Union government; the government can curtail any Fundamental Rights.
- That night the PM recommended Emergency to President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, who proclaimed it immediately. Electricity to major newspaper offices was cut after midnight; many opposition leaders and workers were arrested by morning; the Cabinet was informed at 6 a.m. on 26 June, after all this.
Worked example
What reasons did the government give for declaring Emergency in 1975? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- It declared that there was a threat of internal disturbances, such as JP's call to the army, police and employees not to obey orders, and a nationwide satyagraha threatening to paralyse government.
- It invoked Article 352, saying a grave crisis had arisen that made the proclamation necessary.
Answer: A threat of internal disturbance creating a grave crisis, under Article 352.
- Consequences of Emergency
- NCERT section Consequences
Immediate effects: agitations stopped; strikes banned; many opposition leaders jailed; the situation became quiet but tense.
Press censorship: freedom of the press was suspended; newspapers needed prior approval for all material.
Bans: fearing social and communal disharmony, the government banned the RSS and Jamait-e-Islami; protests, strikes and agitations were disallowed.
Fundamental Rights: various Fundamental Rights were suspended, including the right to move the courts to restore them.
Preventive detention: people were arrested not for an offence but on apprehension they might commit one. Large-scale arrests followed; detainees could not challenge arrest through habeas corpus. Several High Courts said habeas corpus petitions could still be heard, but in April 1976 a constitution bench of the Supreme Court overruled them, accepting the government's plea: the government could take away the right to life and liberty during Emergency. This is regarded as one of the Court's most controversial judgments.
Resistance: activists went underground; the Indian Express and Statesman left blank spaces where news was censored; Seminar and Mainstream chose to close; journalists were arrested; underground newsletters circulated; writers Shivarama Karanth and Fanishwarnath Renu returned their Padma awards. But open defiance was rare.
Constitutional changes: an amendment barred court challenges to elections of the PM, President and Vice-President. The 42nd Amendment made many changes, including extending legislatures' term from five to six years (meant to be permanent); elections could also be postponed by a year during Emergency, so after 1971 elections were due only in 1978, not 1976.
Worked example
What is preventive detention? How was it used during the Emergency? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Preventive detention means arresting and detaining people not for an offence committed but on the apprehension that they may commit one.
- During Emergency the government made large-scale arrests under it; in April 1976 the Supreme Court accepted that detainees could not use habeas corpus, effectively allowing the right to life and liberty to be taken away.
Answer: Detention on suspicion of future offences; widely used, with habeas corpus denied after the 1976 Supreme Court ruling.
- Lessons of the Emergency
- NCERT section Lessons of the Emergency
The Emergency showed both the weaknesses and the strengths of Indian democracy.
Lessons:
1. Democracy is hard to end in India: many think India ceased to be democratic, but normal functioning resumed quickly.
2. Ambiguities in the Emergency provision were corrected: an 'internal' emergency can now be proclaimed only on grounds of 'armed rebellion', and the advice to the President must be given in writing by the Union Cabinet.
3. Greater awareness of civil liberties: courts have since taken an active role in protecting individual liberties, and many civil liberties organisations were formed.Unresolved issues:
- The balance between routine democratic government and continuous political protest: how much freedom to protest, and what limits?
- Emergency was implemented through the police and administration, which became political instruments of the ruling party; according to the Shah Commission Report, the administration and police became vulnerable to political pressure, a problem that did not vanish.
Most lasting lesson: the 1977 election became a referendum on the Emergency, especially in north India; the opposition's slogan was 'save democracy'. Voters punished a government seen as anti-democratic, so 1975-77 ended up strengthening democracy's foundations.
Constitutional vs political crisis: the period was a constitutional crisis (battle over Parliament's and judiciary's jurisdiction) and a political crisis: a party with an absolute majority suspended democratic processes. The Constitution's makers trusted parties to follow democratic norms and the rule of law even in emergencies; these wide powers were abused. The political crisis was more serious. It also raised the tension between institution-based democracy and spontaneous popular participation.
Worked example
What lessons were learnt from the Emergency? (4 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- It is extremely difficult to do away with democracy in India: normal democratic functioning resumed within a short time.
- Ambiguities were removed: internal emergency now only for 'armed rebellion', and only on written advice of the Union Cabinet.
- People became more aware of civil liberties; courts became more active in protecting them and civil liberties organisations grew.
- Voters in 1977 punished a government seen as anti-democratic, strengthening democracy; but issues like limits of protest and politicisation of police and administration remained.
Answer: Democracy proved resilient, emergency provisions were tightened, civil liberties gained value, and voters showed they punish anti-democratic rule.
- The 1977 election, Janata government and legacy
- NCERT section Politics after Emergency: Lok Sabha Elections 1977; Janata Government; Legacy
Elections announced: in January 1977, after eighteen months of Emergency, elections were called and leaders released; polling was in March 1977.
- Opposition parties formed the Janata Party, accepting JP's leadership; some Congress leaders opposed to Emergency joined. Jagjivan Ram formed Congress for Democracy, which later merged with Janata.
- Janata made it a referendum on Emergency, highlighting its non-democratic character and excesses; JP became the symbol of restoring democracy; the party ensured non-Congress votes were not divided.
Results:
- For the first time since Independence, the Congress lost the Lok Sabha: only 154 seats, under 35 per cent votes.
- Janata and allies won 330 of 542; Janata alone 295, a clear majority.
- In north India a massive wave: Congress lost every seat in Bihar, UP, Delhi, Haryana and Punjab, and won just one each in Rajasthan and MP. Indira Gandhi lost at Rae Bareli and Sanjay Gandhi at Amethi.
- But the Congress kept many seats in Maharashtra, Gujarat and Orissa and nearly swept the south: Emergency's impact (forced relocation, forced sterilisations) was concentrated in the north, and north Indian middle castes were moving away from the Congress. So 1977 was not only about Emergency.
Janata government:
- Not cohesive: contest for PM among Morarji Desai, Charan Singh (Bharatiya Lok Dal, farmers' leader) and Jagjivan Ram; Morarji Desai became PM, the first non-Congress PM.
- Critics said it lacked direction, leadership and a common programme, and did not fundamentally change Congress policies.
- It split; Desai's government lost majority in under 28 months; Charan Singh's government, backed by the Congress, lasted about four months before support was withdrawn.
- January 1980 elections: Janata suffered a comprehensive defeat; the Congress under Indira Gandhi won 353 seats. Lesson: voters punish unstable, quarrelsome governments.
Legacy:
- Since 1969 the Congress had shed its umbrella character, claiming to be the only socialist, pro-poor party, relying on sharp social and ideological divisions and one leader.
- Opposition parties relied more on non-Congressism and avoiding division of votes, crucial in 1977.
- Backward castes' welfare began to dominate politics: their shift helped Janata in 1977; northern states elected non-Congress governments with backward caste leaders; OBC reservations became controversial in Bihar, and the Janata government appointed the Mandal Commission.
Worked example
What were the reasons for the defeat of the Congress in 1977? (4 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The election became a referendum on the Emergency: arrests, press censorship and excesses turned opinion against the Congress, especially in the north.
- Opposition parties united in the Janata Party under JP's leadership, so non-Congress votes were not divided; Jagjivan Ram's Congress for Democracy also joined.
- Forced relocation and sterilisations were concentrated in north India, where the Congress was wiped out.
- Long-term change: north Indian middle and backward castes were moving away from the Congress and found a platform in the Janata Party.
Answer: Anger at the Emergency, opposition unity, northern excesses and a shift of middle castes away from the Congress.
The Crisis of Democratic Order in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
Press censorship
Suppose a school magazine must show every article to the principal before printing, and the editors leave blank boxes where articles were cut.
Which Emergency practice and response does this resemble? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Press censorship: newspapers needed prior approval for all material.
- Papers like the Indian Express and Statesman left blank spaces in protest (later even this was banned).
Answer: Censorship and the blank-space protest of 1975.
Memory hook: Blank space speaks loudly.
Voters punish anti-democratic rule
Imagine a club president who cancels meetings for months; when elections finally happen, members vote overwhelmingly for a united rival group.
Which election does this resemble and what lesson does it teach? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- 1977: the election became a referendum on the Emergency, and the Congress lost power at the Centre for the first time.
- Voters severely punish governments seen as anti-democratic.
Answer: 1977; anti-democratic governments are punished by voters.
Memory hook: The ballot remembers.
Unstable governments
Suppose a new class committee spends its term quarrelling over who should lead, and gets nothing done. At the next vote, students bring back the old leader.
Which episode does this resemble? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Janata government lacked direction and a common programme; it split, and Desai's and Charan Singh's governments fell.
- In January 1980 voters returned the Congress with 353 seats, showing they punish unstable, quarrelsome governments.
Answer: The fall of the Janata government and the 1980 election.
Memory hook: Quarrel in power, lose the next hour.
Topics in this chapter
The Crisis of Democratic Order: key facts
- Economic crisis
Refugees ~8 million US aid stopped Oil prices up Inflation 23% (1973), 30% (1974) Food grain output down 8% after 1972-73 monsoon failure - Garibi hatao unfulfilled.
- Movements
Gujarat Jan 1974, President's rule, elections June 1975 (Congress lost) Bihar Mar 1974, JP, Total Revolution Railway strike May 1974, George Fernandes, 20 days - JP's march to Parliament, 1975.
- Judiciary conflict
- Fundamental Rights, property, DPSP amendments rejected; Kesavananda Bharati 1973 (basic structure); A. N. Ray appointed over three seniors (1973)
- 'Committed judiciary'.
- Declaration
12 June 1975 Allahabad HC (Justice Sinha, Raj Narain petition) 24 June SC partial stay 25 June Ramlila rally 25 June Emergency under Article 352 (President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed) 26 June, 6 a.m. Cabinet told - Internal disturbance ground.
- Consequences
- Press censorship
- RSS and Jamait-e-Islami banned
- Fundamental Rights suspended
- preventive detention
- April 1976 SC habeas corpus ruling
- 42nd Amendment (term 5 to 6 years)
- Elections pushed to 1978.
- Lessons
- Democracy hard to end; internal emergency only for 'armed rebellion' on written Cabinet advice; civil liberties valued
- Shah Commission: police and administration politicised.
- 1977 results
- Congress 154, <35% votes; Janata + allies 330/542; Janata 295; Congress zero in Bihar, UP, Delhi, Haryana, Punjab
- Congress strong in south, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Orissa.
- Janata period
- Morarji Desai PM (<28 months); Charan Singh ~4 months; Jan 1980 Congress 353 seats
- Unstable governments punished.
- Legacy
- Non-Congressism; backward castes' rise; Mandal Commission appointed by Janata government
- Party system changed.
How the board asks The Crisis of Democratic Order
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Correct-incorrect statements (1 mark) | Emergency declared in 1975; proclaimed due to economic conditions (incorrect: internal disturbance); opposition leaders arrested. | Remember the official ground was internal disturbance under Article 352. |
| Odd one out and matching (1 mark) | Odd one out among causes (Shah Commission came after); match Total Revolution, garibi hatao, student protest, railway strike. | Shah Commission was appointed in 1977, after Emergency. |
| 2-mark answers | Preventive detention; Kesavananda Bharati; Allahabad verdict; Total Revolution; Shah Commission. | Definition plus date or name. |
| Cartoon or passage (4 x 1) | Blank editorial, 1977 results cartoon, two-party system passage. | Link to censorship, referendum on Emergency, Janata splits. |
| 4-mark answers | Background; consequences; lessons; reasons for 1977 result; 1980 mid-term election. | Four points with dates and examples. |
Tricks to remember The Crisis of Democratic Order
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
June 1975 dates
"12-24-25": HC verdict, SC partial stay, Emergency.
Use it when: Declaration timeline.
Background
"EGBRJ": Economy, Gujarat, Bihar, Railway strike, Judiciary.
Use it when: Causes.
Lessons
"Hard to kill, Armed rebellion only, Liberty valued, Voters punish".
Use it when: 4-mark lessons answer.
1977 numbers
"154 vs 295 (330 with allies)".
Use it when: Results.
The Crisis of Democratic Order: board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: Statements on Emergency · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Which statement about the 1975 Emergency is INCORRECT?
(a) It was declared in 1975.
(b) Many opposition leaders were arrested.
(c) It was officially proclaimed because of deteriorating economic conditions.
(d) Press censorship was imposed.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The official ground was a threat of internal disturbances under Article 352, not the economy.
Answer: (c).
Example 2: Odd one out · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Which of these did NOT form part of the background to the 1975 Emergency?
(a) The Allahabad High Court verdict
(b) JP's call for Total Revolution
(c) The nationwide strike by railway employees
(d) The findings of the Shah Commission
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (a)-(c) came before Emergency and formed its background.
- The Shah Commission was appointed after Emergency by the Janata government in 1977.
Answer: (d).
Example 3: Matching · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Match:
i. Total Revolution a. Indira Gandhi
ii. Garibi Hatao b. Jayaprakash Narayan
iii. Students' protest c. George Fernandes
iv. Railway strike d. Bihar movement
(a) i-b, ii-a, iii-d, iv-c
(b) i-a, ii-b, iii-d, iv-c
(c) i-b, ii-a, iii-c, iv-d
(d) i-d, ii-a, iii-b, iv-c
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- JP: Total Revolution; Indira Gandhi: Garibi Hatao; students: Bihar movement; George Fernandes: railway strike.
Answer: (a).
Example 4: Assertion-reason on emergency provisions · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level
Assertion (A): After the Emergency, the grounds for an internal emergency were narrowed.
Reason (R): An internal emergency can now be proclaimed only on grounds of 'armed rebellion' and on written advice of the Union Cabinet.
Choose (a)-(d).
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Both true; R describes exactly how the grounds were narrowed.
Answer: (a) Both are true and R explains A.
Example 5: Effects on polity · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Discuss the effects of the Emergency on civil liberties, the judiciary, mass media and the police and bureaucracy. (4 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Civil liberties: Fundamental Rights suspended, including the right to move courts; preventive detention on a large scale.
- Judiciary: the April 1976 Supreme Court ruling accepted that detainees could not seek habeas corpus, closing the courts to citizens; earlier supersession of judges had strained relations.
- Media: press censorship required prior approval; some papers left blank spaces, magazines closed, journalists were arrested.
- Police and bureaucracy: became political instruments of the ruling party; the Shah Commission found them vulnerable to political pressure.
Answer: Liberties were suspended, courts' protection weakened, media censored, and police and bureaucracy politicised.
Example 6: 1980 mid-term election · 2 marks · Very short answerBoard level
What were the reasons for the mid-term elections of 1980? (2 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Janata Party lacked direction, leadership and a common programme; it split and Morarji Desai's government lost majority in under 28 months.
- Charan Singh's government, formed with Congress support, fell in about four months when the Congress withdrew support, so fresh elections were held in January 1980.
Answer: Janata's internal splits and the fall of the Desai and Charan Singh governments.
Example 7: Constitutional or political crisis · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
'The political crisis of 1975-77 was more serious than the constitutional crisis.' Explain. (4 marks)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Constitutional crisis: the battle between Parliament and judiciary over amending Fundamental Rights, basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati), and supersession of judges.
- Political crisis: a party with an absolute majority chose to suspend the democratic process.
- The Constitution's makers trusted all parties to follow democratic norms and use emergency powers within the rule of law, and so gave wide powers.
- These powers were abused (censorship, detentions, amendments), which is why the political crisis was more serious; it also exposed tension between institutional democracy and mass protest.
Answer: Because the abuse of trust and powers by an elected majority threatened democracy more than legal disputes did.
Case-study practice (Section E style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 4-mark question split into 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 marks.
The Allahabad verdict
Read the passage and answer the questions.
On 12 June 1975, a judge of the Allahabad High Court declared the Prime Minister's election to the Lok Sabha invalid, on a petition by a socialist leader who had contested against her in 1971. The petition said she had used government servants in her campaign. On 24 June the Supreme Court allowed her to stay an MP until her appeal was decided, but not to take part in Lok Sabha proceedings. The opposition demanded her resignation.
(Based on NCERT, Politics in India since Independence, Chapter 6)
(i) · 1 mark
Who filed the election petition?
Answer
Answer: Raj Narain.
(ii) · 1 mark
Which judge delivered the verdict?
Answer
Answer: Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha of the Allahabad High Court.
(iii) · 1 mark
What did the verdict mean legally for the Prime Minister?
Answer
Answer: She was no longer an MP and could not remain PM unless re-elected as an MP within six months.
(iv) · 1 mark
How did the government respond to the opposition's campaign?
Answer
Answer: It declared a state of emergency on 25 June 1975 under Article 352, citing a threat of internal disturbances.
The 1977 election
Read the passage and answer the questions.
After eighteen months of Emergency, elections were announced in January 1977 and political prisoners released. Opposition parties came together to form a new party under Jayaprakash Narayan's leadership, and made the election a referendum on the Emergency. For the first time since Independence, the Congress lost a Lok Sabha election, winning only 154 seats. Yet it did well in the south and in some western and eastern states.
(Based on NCERT, Politics in India since Independence, Chapter 6)
(i) · 1 mark
Name the new party formed by the opposition.
Answer
Answer: The Janata Party.
(ii) · 1 mark
How many seats did the Janata Party win on its own?
Answer
Answer: 295 seats (330 with allies, out of 542).
(iii) · 1 mark
Why did the Congress do better in the south?
Answer
Answer: Because the Emergency's impact, such as forced relocation and sterilisations, was concentrated in the north.
(iv) · 1 mark
Who became the first non-Congress Prime Minister?
Answer
Answer: Morarji Desai.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
What was 'Total Revolution'? (2 marks) (2 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| A call given by Jayaprakash Narayan during the Bihar movement (1974). | 1 |
| For revolution in social, economic and political spheres to establish what he considered true democracy. | 1 |
Explain the conflict between the government and the judiciary before 1975. (4 marks) (4 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Court ruled Parliament cannot abridge Fundamental Rights or curtail property rights by amendment. | 1 |
| Court rejected amendment allowing abridging rights for Directive Principles; Kesavananda Bharati (1973): basic structure. | 1 |
| Supersession of three judges to appoint A. N. Ray as Chief Justice (1973); talk of 'committed judiciary'. | 1 |
| Climax: Allahabad High Court declared Indira Gandhi's election invalid (12 June 1975). | 1 |
Explain the background, declaration and consequences of the Emergency of 1975. (6 marks) (6 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Economic crisis: inflation, unemployment, drought. | 1 |
| Gujarat and Bihar movements, JP, railway strike. | 1 |
| Conflict with judiciary and the Allahabad verdict. | 1 |
| Declaration on 25 June 1975 under Article 352 on internal disturbance. | 1 |
| Censorship, bans, suspended rights, preventive detention. | 1 |
| Constitutional amendments (42nd); resistance; ended with 1977 elections. | 1 |
Where students lose marks in The Crisis of Democratic Order
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Citing the economy as the official ground for Emergency
Economic crisis was background.
Do this: Official ground: threat of internal disturbances under Article 352.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Mixing Article 352 and 356
Both emergency provisions.
Do this: 352: national emergency (used in 1975); 356: President's rule in states (used in Kerala 1959).
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Saying the Congress lost everywhere in 1977
Overgeneralising the wave.
Do this: It nearly swept the south and kept seats in Maharashtra, Gujarat and Orissa.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Writing about the dropped 'Controversies regarding Emergency' section
Older guides include it.
Do this: It is not in the 2026-27 syllabus.
Usually costs: Wasted time.
Mistake: Putting the Shah Commission before Emergency
Odd-one-out confusion.
Do this: It was appointed in 1977 by the Janata government.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
NCERT exercise guide: The Crisis of Democratic Order
What each exercise in the NCERT chapter tests, how to approach it, and a question of the same kind solved step by step. Questions here are written in our own words.
Objective questions (Q1-3)
What it tests: Correct or incorrect statements on the Emergency, odd one out among its causes, and matching slogans and events with leaders.
How to approach it: Know the official ground (internal disturbance), the chronology, and leader-event pairs.
Mirrors Q1(b)
Correct or incorrect: 'The Emergency led to the suspension of fundamental rights.' (1 mark)
Show the solutionSolution
- Under Emergency provisions, various Fundamental Rights were suspended, including the right to move courts to restore them.
Answer: Correct (the textbook says various Fundamental Rights stood suspended).
Short and long answers and passage (Q4-10)
What it tests: The 1980 mid-term election, the Shah Commission, reasons for Emergency, reasons for 1977, effects on the polity and party system, and a passage on the near two-party system of 1977.
How to approach it: Use key concepts and worked examples; for the passage, explain Janata vs Congress as two main contenders and the later splits.
Mirrors Q10(a)
What made the party system look like a two-party system in 1977? (2 marks)
Show the solutionSolution
- Major opposition parties merged into the Janata Party to avoid splitting non-Congress votes.
- So the contest was largely between two main contenders: the Congress and the Janata Party.
Answer: Opposition unity in the Janata Party produced a mainly two-way contest with the Congress.
Practice questions on The Crisis of Democratic Order
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Emergency in 1975 was declared under:
(a) Article 356
(b) Article 352
(c) Article 360
(d) Article 51Hint
External threat or internal disturbance.
Answer
(b).
Q2 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Which case established that Parliament cannot amend the basic structure of the Constitution?
(a) Raj Narain's election petition
(b) Kesavananda Bharati
(c) Shah Commission inquiry
(d) The April 1976 habeas corpus caseHint
1973.
Answer
(b).
Q3 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level
Assertion (A): The Congress lost every Lok Sabha seat in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh in 1977.
Reason (R): The impact of the Emergency, including forced sterilisations, was felt most in the northern states.
Choose (a)-(d).Hint
North-south difference.
Answer
(a) Both are true and R explains A (with the shift of middle castes as a further reason).
Q4 · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Arrange in order: (i) Allahabad High Court verdict (ii) Kesavananda Bharati judgment (iii) Gujarat student agitation begins (iv) Supreme Court's habeas corpus ruling
(a) ii, iii, i, iv
(b) iii, ii, i, iv
(c) ii, i, iii, iv
(d) i, ii, iii, ivHint
1973, Jan 1974, June 1975, April 1976.
Answer
(a).
Q5 · 2 marks · Very short answerBoard level
Why was the Shah Commission appointed and what did it find, as per the textbook? (2 marks)
Hint
Janata government, 1977.
Answer
It was appointed by the Janata Party government in 1977 to inquire into the Emergency period. The textbook cites its report as finding that the administration and police became vulnerable to political pressures and were turned into political instruments of the ruling party.
Q6 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Suppose a school principal suspends the student council, bans the school magazine from printing anything without approval and punishes students for what they might do. When the council is restored, students vote out the principal's supporters. What lessons from 1975-77 does this mirror? (4 marks)
Hint
Censorship, preventive detention, 1977 verdict.
Answer
It mirrors suspension of democratic processes (Emergency), press censorship (prior approval), and preventive detention (punishing for apprehended acts). The vote mirrors 1977, when voters punished a government seen as anti-democratic, showing democracy is hard to end and voters value civil liberties. It also shows why safeguards matter: after 1977, internal emergency was limited to armed rebellion on written Cabinet advice.
Q7 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
In what way did the Emergency affect the party system in India? (4 marks)
Hint
Janata, non-Congressism, backward castes.
Answer
Opposition parties merged into the Janata Party to avoid dividing votes, and the Congress lost power at the Centre for the first time in 1977. Non-Congressism became a key opposition strategy. The Congress, no longer an umbrella party, relied on ideology and one leader. Backward castes gained importance: their shift helped Janata, northern states elected governments with backward caste leaders, and the Janata government appointed the Mandal Commission. Janata's instability and 1980 defeat showed voters also punish quarrelsome governments.
Q8 · 2 marks · Very short answerHarder board level
Why did JP's call to the army, police and government employees worry the government? (2 marks)
Hint
Standstill.
Answer
JP asked them not to obey 'illegal and immoral orders' while announcing a nationwide satyagraha; this threatened to bring government activity to a standstill, and the government cited such threats of internal disturbance to declare Emergency.
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.What was D. K. Barooah's slogan in 1974?Show answer
'Indira is India, India is Indira'.
2.Who led the 1974 railway strike?Show answer
George Fernandes.
3.Which President proclaimed the Emergency?Show answer
Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed.
4.Which organisations were banned during the Emergency?Show answer
The RSS and Jamait-e-Islami.
5.Which writers returned their awards in protest?Show answer
Shivarama Karanth (Padma Bhushan) and Fanishwarnath Renu (Padma Shri).
6.What did the 42nd Amendment do to legislatures' terms?Show answer
Extended them from five to six years.
7.What party did Jagjivan Ram form in 1977?Show answer
Congress for Democracy, which later merged with the Janata Party.
8.Which commission on backward classes did the Janata government appoint?Show answer
The Mandal Commission.
Best order to study it
- Start with the political and economic background.
- Learn the Gujarat and Bihar movements and the railway strike.
- Study the conflict with the judiciary and the Allahabad verdict.
- Learn the declaration, consequences and lessons of Emergency.
- Finish with the 1977 election, Janata government, 1980 and legacy; practise statements and 4-mark answers.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- Can you list the economic causes of discontent?
- Can you describe the Gujarat and Bihar movements and JP's role?
- Can you explain the railway strike of 1974?
- Can you state the three constitutional issues and Kesavananda Bharati?
- Can you narrate events from 12 to 26 June 1975?
- Can you list the consequences of Emergency?
- Can you explain preventive detention and the 1976 ruling?
- Can you state the lessons of Emergency?
- Can you give the 1977 results and reasons?
- Can you explain the Janata government's fall and the legacy?
The Crisis of Democratic Order: frequently asked questions
How many marks does this chapter carry?
The Crisis of Democratic Order carries 4 of the 80 theory marks in the 2026-27 CBSE Political Science paper.
Is the section 'Controversies regarding Emergency' in the syllabus?
No. It was dropped by NCERT in 2022 and is not in the 2026-27 syllabus.
What changed in the Emergency provisions after 1977?
An internal emergency can now be proclaimed only on grounds of 'armed rebellion', and only on the written advice of the Union Cabinet.
Why is the 1977 election called a referendum?
Because the Janata Party campaigned on the Emergency's excesses and the opposition's slogan was 'save democracy', so the vote became a verdict on the Emergency, especially in north India.
Who was the first non-Congress Prime Minister?
Morarji Desai, who became PM in 1977 as head of the Janata Party government.
Based on: CBSE Political Science (028) syllabus 2026-27; NCERT Politics in India since Independence, Class XII (Reprint 2026-27)