Franchise and Representation: ISC Class 12 Political Science Notes
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Franchise is the right to vote; universal adult franchise gives it to every adult citizen regardless of caste, sex, religion or wealth. ISC Class 12 covers why it is widely accepted, the meaning of First Past the Post and Proportional Representation, the meaning of political parties, and the meaning and merits of single, two and multi-party systems.
What Franchise and Representation is about
This chapter explains how citizens take part in government in a representative democracy: they vote (franchise), their votes are turned into seats by an electoral system (representation), and they organise through political parties.
The syllabus asks for:
1. Universal Adult Franchise: meaning and reasons for its widespread acceptance.
2. Representation: the meaning only of the First Past the Post (FPTP) system and of Proportional Representation (PR).
3. Political parties: meaning.
4. Kinds of party system (single-party, bi-party and multi-party): meaning and merits only.
Note the explicit limits: FPTP and PR are 'meaning only', and party systems are 'meaning and merits only', so demerits are not required. Questions are usually short: one-mark assertion-reason items (for example on why a candidate can win under FPTP without a majority), one-word terms, and four-mark explanations. Examples from India, the UK and the USA help in every answer.
Weightage: CISCE publishes no chapter or unit weightage for ISC Political Science. Franchise and Representation is part of Section A: Constitution and Government, 3 of the 2027 syllabus and can be asked anywhere in the 80-mark Paper I (Section A 16 one-mark items, Section B 4-mark short answers, Section C 8-mark long answers).Source: CISCE ISC Political Science (852) syllabus, examination year 2027; ISC 2027 specimen question paper
Key concepts
- Universal Adult Franchise: meaning
Franchise means the right to vote. Universal Adult Franchise means that every adult citizen, above a minimum age fixed by law, has the right to vote, without any discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex, wealth, education or place of birth.
In India: Article 326 provides that elections to the Lok Sabha and state Legislative Assemblies shall be on the basis of adult suffrage. The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Amendment (1988). Each voter has one vote of equal value ('one person, one vote, one value').
History: the vote was earlier restricted by property, education or sex. Britain gave women equal voting rights only in 1928; the USA gave women the vote by the 19th Amendment (1920) and lowered the age to 18 by the 26th Amendment (1971). India adopted universal adult franchise at once in 1950.
Reasonable exclusions: non-citizens, those below the voting age, persons of unsound mind, and some persons disqualified by law for corrupt practices or crimes.
Worked example
[4] What is meant by Universal Adult Franchise? How is it provided for in India? (Recall)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Meaning: every adult citizen has the right to vote without discrimination of caste, religion, sex, wealth or education - 2 marks.
- India: Article 326 bases elections on adult suffrage - 1 mark.
- Voting age 18 (61st Amendment, 1988); one person, one vote - 1 mark.
Answer: Universal Adult Franchise means that every adult citizen above a minimum age has the right to vote, with no discrimination based on caste, religion, race, sex, wealth or education. In India, Article 326 provides for elections to the Lok Sabha and the state assemblies on adult suffrage, and the 61st Amendment (1988) lowered the voting age to 18; every voter has one vote of equal value.
- Reasons for the widespread acceptance of Universal Adult Franchise
1. Political equality: it treats every citizen as equal, giving the same voice to rich and poor, men and women.
2. Popular sovereignty: power belongs to the people, and the vote is the means through which they authorise government.
3. Legitimacy: a government chosen by all adults has a stronger moral claim to obedience.
4. Protection of interests: every section, including the poor, minorities and women, can defend its interests through the vote; restricted franchise allowed the privileged to rule in their own interest.
5. Political education: voting makes citizens aware of public issues and builds responsibility.
6. Peaceful change: governments can be changed through the ballot instead of violence.
7. Dignity and self-respect: being counted gives every citizen a sense of belonging.
8. Global norm: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948, Article 21) recognises the right to take part in government through genuine elections by universal and equal suffrage.Worked example
[4] Give four reasons for the widespread acceptance of Universal Adult Franchise. (Understand)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- It ensures political equality, irrespective of caste, gender, religion or status - 1 mark.
- It reflects popular sovereignty and makes government legitimate - 1 mark.
- It lets every section, including the poor and minorities, protect its interests - 1 mark.
- It provides political education and allows peaceful change of government - 1 mark.
Answer: Universal Adult Franchise is widely accepted because (1) it gives every citizen equal political worth regardless of caste, gender, religion or status; (2) it expresses the sovereignty of the people and gives governments legitimacy; (3) it allows all groups, including the poor, women and minorities, to protect their interests; and (4) it educates citizens politically and makes peaceful change of government possible.
- First Past the Post system (meaning)
Meaning: an electoral system in which the country is divided into single-member constituencies, each voter casts one vote for a candidate, and the candidate who gets more votes than any other candidate (a plurality or relative majority) wins, even if he or she does not get more than half of the votes cast.
It is also called the simple-plurality or 'winner takes all' system. It is used for elections to the Lok Sabha and state Legislative Assemblies in India, the House of Commons in the UK and the House of Representatives in the USA.
Illustration: if candidates A, B and C get 40, 35 and 25 per cent of votes, A wins with 40 per cent, though 60 per cent voted against A. This is why a party can win a majority of seats with less than half the votes.
Worked example
[4] Explain the meaning of the First Past the Post system with an example. Why can a candidate win without a majority of votes? (Understand)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Single-member constituencies; one vote per voter - 1 mark.
- The candidate with the most votes wins (plurality) - 1 mark.
- Example: 40 per cent against 35 and 25 per cent wins - 1 mark.
- A majority (over 50 per cent) is not needed, only more votes than each rival; used for the Lok Sabha - 1 mark.
Answer: Under First Past the Post the country is divided into single-member constituencies, each voter casts one vote, and the candidate with more votes than any rival wins, as in Lok Sabha elections. If three candidates poll 40, 35 and 25 per cent, the first wins although 60 per cent voted for others, because the rule requires only a plurality, not an absolute majority of the votes.
- Proportional Representation (meaning)
Meaning: an electoral system that seeks to create a legislature in which each party's share of seats reflects, as closely as possible, its share of the votes. If a party wins 30 per cent of the votes, it should get about 30 per cent of the seats.
Key points
- Constituencies are usually large and multi-member (sometimes the whole country is one constituency).
- Common forms: the list system (voters vote for a party; seats are filled from party lists in proportion to votes, as in Israel and the Netherlands) and the single transferable vote (voters rank candidates in order of preference; a quota decides the winners).
- In India the single transferable vote is used for indirect elections: the President, the Vice-President, the Rajya Sabha and state Legislative Councils.
Since the syllabus asks for the meaning only, a clear definition with an example is sufficient.
Worked example
[4] Distinguish between the First Past the Post system and Proportional Representation by meaning, with one example of the use of each in India. (Analyse)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- FPTP: single-member constituency; candidate with the most votes wins - 1 mark.
- Example: Lok Sabha and state Assembly elections - 1 mark.
- PR: each party's share of seats reflects its share of votes, usually in multi-member constituencies - 1 mark.
- Example: single transferable vote for the Rajya Sabha or the President - 1 mark.
Answer: Under First Past the Post, each single-member constituency elects the candidate with the most votes, as in Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. Under Proportional Representation, seats are allotted so that each party's share of seats matches its share of votes, usually in multi-member constituencies; in India a form of it, the single transferable vote, is used to elect the Rajya Sabha and the President.
- Political parties: meaning
Meaning: a political party is an organised group of people who share broadly common views on public policy and seek to win power through elections in order to form a government and carry out their programme.
Essential elements
1. Organisation: members, leaders and a structure.
2. Common principles or programme (an ideology or manifesto).
3. Aim of capturing political power through constitutional means (elections).
4. Concern with national or public interest, at least in its claims.Roles in a democracy (for understanding): contesting elections and putting up candidates; forming governments or acting as the opposition; shaping public opinion; making laws through their members; linking people with government. In India parties are registered and recognised by the Election Commission (national and state parties).
Worked example
What is meant by a political party?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- An organised group sharing common views on public policy.
- It seeks to win power through elections to form a government and implement its programme.
Answer: A political party is an organised group of people with broadly common views on public policy that tries to win political power through elections so that it can form the government and carry out its programme.
- Party systems: single-party, bi-party and multi-party (meaning and merits)
Single-party system
- Meaning: only one party is allowed to exist legally and hold power; others are banned. Examples: China (Communist Party), the former USSR.
- Merits: (1) quick decisions and strong, stable government; (2) national unity and discipline, free of party quarrels; (3) long-term planning without interruption by elections; (4) less expense on elections and party rivalry.
Bi-party (two-party) system
- Meaning: two major parties dominate politics and alternate in power, although other small parties may exist legally. Examples: the USA (Democrats and Republicans), the UK (Conservatives and Labour).
- Merits: (1) stable government, as one party usually wins a clear majority; (2) clear choice for voters between two programmes; (3) a strong, recognised opposition that acts as an alternative government; (4) clear responsibility, since voters know whom to praise or blame; (5) moderate policies, because each party appeals to the middle ground.
Multi-party system
- Meaning: many parties, often three or more with real strength, compete for power; often no single party wins a majority, so coalitions form. Examples: India, France, Italy.
- Merits: (1) represents varied interests, regions, languages and ideologies of a diverse society; (2) wider choice for voters; (3) coalition government encourages consensus and compromise; (4) prevents domination by one party, protecting minorities and regions.
(The syllabus asks for meaning and merits only; demerits are not required.)
Worked example
[4] What is meant by a multi-party system? Explain any three of its merits. (Understand)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Meaning: many parties compete for power, often leading to coalition governments; e.g. India - 1 mark.
- Merit: represents the diverse interests, regions and ideologies of society - 1 mark.
- Merit: wider choice for voters - 1 mark.
- Merit: coalitions encourage consensus and prevent domination by one party - 1 mark.
Answer: A multi-party system is one in which several parties compete for power and often no single party wins a majority, so coalition governments are formed, as in India. Its merits are that it represents the varied interests of a diverse society, gives voters a wide choice, and encourages consensus through coalitions while preventing any one party from dominating.
Franchise and Representation in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
First Past the Post
Suppose a class election has four candidates. Riya gets 12 votes, Aman 10, Kabir 9 and Zoya 9, out of 40.
Who wins under First Past the Post, and what share of the votes did the winner get?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Under FPTP the candidate with the most votes wins.
- Riya has 12, more than any other candidate.
- 12 out of 40 is 30 per cent; 70 per cent voted for others.
Answer: Riya wins with 12 of 40 votes (30 per cent), even though 70 per cent voted for other candidates; FPTP needs only a plurality.
Memory hook: Most votes, not half the votes.
Proportional Representation
Imagine a school council of 20 seats elected by party lists. Party Green gets 50 per cent of the votes, Blue 30 per cent and Red 20 per cent.
How many seats would each party get under pure Proportional Representation?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Seats in proportion to votes: 50, 30 and 20 per cent of 20.
- Green: 10 seats; Blue: 6 seats; Red: 4 seats.
Answer: Green 10, Blue 6 and Red 4 seats: each party's share of seats equals its share of votes.
Memory hook: Your share of votes is your share of seats.
Why adult franchise is valued
Suppose a residents' association lets only flat-owners vote, and it decides to spend all funds on a car park while tenants want a children's play area.
What argument for universal adult franchise does this illustrate?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A restricted franchise lets the privileged decide in their own interest.
- Excluded groups cannot protect their needs.
- Giving every adult a vote ensures all interests are represented.
Answer: It illustrates that a restricted franchise lets a privileged few serve their own interests; universal adult franchise lets every section, including the less well-off, protect its interests.
Memory hook: Whoever votes, counts.
Topics in this chapter
Franchise and Representation: key facts
- Universal Adult Franchise (India)
- Article 326; voting age 18 (61st Amendment, 1988)
- One person, one vote, one value.
- First Past the Post
- Single-member constituency; plurality wins
- Lok Sabha, House of Commons, US House.
- Proportional Representation
- Share of seats = share of votes
- List system; single transferable vote (Rajya Sabha, President).
- Political party
- Organised group + common programme + aim of power by elections
- Recognised by the Election Commission in India.
- Party systems
- Single (China), bi-party (USA, UK), multi-party (India, France)
- Meaning and merits only.
How the board asks Franchise and Representation
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Section A one-mark items | Assertion-reason on FPTP or adult franchise; one-word term for a system where seats reflect vote shares; true or false on bi-party systems. | Know exact terms: 'Proportional Representation', 'plurality'. In a bi-party system other parties exist legally. |
| Section B four-mark questions | Meaning of universal adult franchise and reasons for its acceptance; meaning of a party system and its merits; data on vote and seat shares to interpret. | Start with a definition, then numbered reasons or merits with an example country. |
| Data or case-based items | A table of votes and seats: explain why a party won most seats with less than half the votes. | Link the result to FPTP (plurality in each constituency), not to proportional rules. |
Tricks to remember Franchise and Representation
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
Reasons for adult franchise: 'E-S-P-E-P'
Equality, Sovereignty of people, Protection of interests, Education, Peaceful change.
Use it when: Four-point reasons.
Party systems by country
One - China; Two - USA and UK; Many - India.
Use it when: Examples for meanings.
FPTP vs PR
FPTP: the first (most votes) past the post wins. PR: seats in proportion to votes.
Use it when: Meanings.
Franchise and Representation: board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: Assertion-reason: FPTP · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonBoard level
Assertion (A): Under First Past the Post, a candidate can win without a majority of the votes cast.
Reason (R): The candidate needs only more votes than every other candidate.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) Both A and R are false.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A is true: e.g. 40 per cent can win against 35 and 25.
- R is true and is exactly why A happens.
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Example 2: Bi-party system · 1 mark · Very short answerHarder board level
A classmate says Britain and the USA must ban small parties because they have two-party systems. Is she right? Give a reason.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- In the USA and UK, many small parties exist legally.
- Only two dominate and alternate in power.
Answer: No. Other parties may exist legally; a bi-party system means two major parties dominate and alternate in power.
Example 3: Meaning and merits of a two-party system · 4 marks · Short answerBoard level
[4] What is meant by a bi-party system? Explain three of its merits. (Understand)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Meaning: two major parties dominate and alternate in power (USA, UK).
- Merit: stable government, as one party usually wins a majority.
- Merit: strong opposition, ready to form an alternative government.
- Merit: clear choice and clear responsibility for voters.
Answer: A bi-party system is one in which two major parties dominate politics and take turns in power, as the Democrats and Republicans do in the USA. Its merits are stable government, since one party usually has a majority; a strong, recognised opposition ready to govern; and a clear choice for voters, who know which party is responsible for what.
Example 4: Reading a result table · 4 marks · Case-basedHarder board level
[4] In an election under First Past the Post, Party X won 38 per cent of the votes and 55 per cent of the seats, while Party Y won 30 per cent of the votes and 20 per cent of the seats. Explain how this is possible and what would happen under Proportional Representation. (Analyse)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Under FPTP each seat goes to the plurality winner; X probably came first in many constituencies by small margins.
- Votes for losing candidates win no seats, so X's seat share exceeds its vote share.
- Y's votes may have been spread thinly, coming second in many seats.
- Under PR seats would follow vote share: X about 38 per cent, Y about 30 per cent of seats.
Answer: Under First Past the Post a party wins a seat by coming first in a constituency, however narrowly, and votes for losing candidates win nothing. Party X probably came first in many seats by small margins, while Party Y's votes were spread thinly, so X's share of seats is far above its share of votes. Under Proportional Representation seats would follow votes, giving X about 38 per cent and Y about 30 per cent of the seats.
Example 5: Is adult franchise enough? · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
[4] 'Universal adult franchise gives political equality but not equal influence.' Evaluate. (Evaluate)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Equality: each adult has one vote of equal value.
- But money, media and organisation give some groups more influence over parties and policy.
- FPTP can leave large minorities unrepresented.
- Still, adult franchise has empowered the poor and marginalised in India; it is necessary though not sufficient.
Answer: The statement is fair. Adult franchise gives every citizen one equal vote, which is formal political equality. Yet wealth, media control and organisation give some groups far greater influence over parties and policy, and under First Past the Post many votes do not translate into seats. Even so, adult franchise has enabled the poor and marginalised in India to assert themselves; it is necessary for equality but needs other reforms to make influence equal.
Example 6: Comparing party systems · 8 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
[8] Explain the meaning of single-party, bi-party and multi-party systems and state two merits of each. (Understand)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Single-party: only one party allowed (China) (1).
- Merits: quick decisions and stability; long-term planning, national unity (1).
- Bi-party: two major parties dominate and alternate (USA, UK) (1).
- Merits: stable majority government; strong opposition and clear responsibility (2).
- Multi-party: many parties, coalitions common (India) (1).
- Merits: represents diversity; wider choice; consensus through coalitions (2).
Answer: Single-party system: only one party may legally exist and rule, as in China; its merits are quick decisions with stable government and uninterrupted long-term planning with national unity. Bi-party system: two major parties dominate and alternate in power, as in the USA and the UK; its merits are stable majority governments and a strong opposition that offers voters a clear choice and clear responsibility. Multi-party system: many parties compete and coalitions are common, as in India; its merits are fuller representation of a diverse society, wider choice for voters and consensus-building through coalitions.
Case-study practice (Section D style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 8-mark question split into 2 + 2 + 3 + 1 marks.
Votes and seats (data-based)
Study the data (for a hypothetical state assembly of 100 seats elected by First Past the Post) and answer.
Party A: 41 per cent of votes, 62 seats.
Party B: 33 per cent of votes, 30 seats.
Party C: 18 per cent of votes, 6 seats.
Others: 8 per cent of votes, 2 seats.
(i) · 2 marks
Which electoral system produced this result? Define it.
Answer
Answer: First Past the Post: in each single-member constituency the candidate with the most votes wins, even without a majority.
1 mark for naming, 1 for meaning.
(ii) · 2 marks
How many seats would Party C get under pure Proportional Representation? Show your reasoning.
Answer
Answer: 18 per cent of 100 seats = 18 seats.
1 for method, 1 for answer.
(iii) · 3 marks
What kind of party system does this result suggest? State two of its merits.
Answer
Answer: A multi-party system (several parties with significant support). Merits: it represents varied interests of society; it gives voters a wide choice (also: encourages consensus through coalitions).
1 mark for the system; 1 per merit.
(iv) · 1 mark
Did Party A win a majority of the votes?
Answer
Answer: No. It won 41 per cent of the votes but a majority of the seats.
1 mark.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
[4] Give four reasons for the widespread acceptance of Universal Adult Franchise. (4 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Political equality. | 1 |
| Popular sovereignty; legitimacy. | 1 |
| Protection of interests of all sections. | 1 |
| Political education; peaceful change. | 1 |
[8] Meaning and two merits each of single, bi- and multi-party systems. (8 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Single-party meaning. | 1 |
| Single-party merits. | 1 |
| Bi-party meaning. | 1 |
| Bi-party merit 1. | 1 |
| Bi-party merit 2. | 1 |
| Multi-party meaning. | 1 |
| Multi-party merit 1. | 1 |
| Multi-party merit 2. | 1 |
Where students lose marks in Franchise and Representation
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Confusing plurality with simple (absolute) majority
CISCE examiners' suggestion, 2025 (FPTP assertion-reason): 'Discuss the First Past the Post system, distinguishing the relative majority from the simple majority system.'
Wrong working
Under FPTP a candidate must get more than 50 per cent of the votes.
Right working
Under FPTP a candidate needs only more votes than any other candidate (a relative majority).
Do this: FPTP = most votes; absolute majority = more than half.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Not knowing the term for Proportional Representation
CISCE examiners' suggestion, 2025 (one-word item on a system reflecting vote shares): 'Give detailed explanations of terms and clarify the meanings of various types of election systems.'
Do this: Learn the exact term: Proportional Representation.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Thinking a bi-party system bans other parties
The 2025 paper included a true-or-false item on this; other parties exist legally in the USA and UK.
Do this: Only a single-party system bans other parties.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Writing demerits when only meaning and merits are asked
The syllabus limits party systems to 'meaning and merits only'; demerits earn nothing and waste time.
Do this: Give a definition, an example country and merits.
Usually costs: Time and marks for missing merits.
Mistake: Wrong option in assertion-reason on adult franchise
CISCE examiners' comments, 2024 (assertion-reason on adult franchise): 'Some candidates opted for incorrect options.'
Do this: Political equality is the main reason adult franchise is accepted, so R explains A.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Practice questions on Franchise and Representation
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · Very short answerBoard level
Which Article of the Indian Constitution provides for adult suffrage?
Hint
Elections chapter.
Answer
Article 326.
Q2 · 1 mark · Very short answerBoard level
Under which electoral system would a party winning about a fifth of the votes expect about a fifth of the seats?
Hint
Two words.
Answer
Proportional Representation.
Q3 · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Which of these elections in India uses the single transferable vote?
(a) Lok Sabha
(b) State Legislative Assembly
(c) Rajya Sabha
(d) Municipal CorporationHint
Indirect election.
Answer
(c) Rajya Sabha.
Q4 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level
Assertion (A): Universal adult franchise is widely accepted today.
Reason (R): It gives every adult citizen an equal say in choosing the government, whatever their wealth, sex or background.
Choose: (a) both true, R explains A; (b) both true, R does not explain A; (c) A true, R false; (d) A false, R true.Hint
Is equality a reason for acceptance?
Answer
(a) Both true, and R explains A.
Q5 · 4 marks · Short answerBoard level
[4] Explain the meaning of a political party and state its essential elements.
Hint
Organisation, programme, power, means.
Answer
A political party is an organised group of people with broadly common views on public policy that seeks power through elections to implement its programme. Its essential elements are (1) an organisation with members and leaders, (2) agreed principles or a programme, (3) the aim of capturing political power, and (4) the use of constitutional means such as elections.
Q6 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
[4] Explain the merits of a single-party system.
Hint
Speed, stability, planning, unity.
Answer
(1) Decisions are quick because there is no opposition to delay them. (2) Government is stable, without changes after elections. (3) Long-term plans can be carried out without interruption. (4) Party rivalry is absent, which is said to promote national unity and discipline.
Q7 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
[4] Analyse why India has a multi-party system rather than a two-party system.
Hint
Diversity; regions; federalism.
Answer
(1) India's diversity of language, religion, caste and region creates many distinct interests that seek their own parties. (2) Federalism allows strong regional parties to win power in states. (3) Different ideologies (left, right, centrist) have organised bases. (4) The easy registration of parties and the wide franchise encourage new parties; as a result coalitions have often governed at the Centre.
Q8 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
[4] Why does First Past the Post tend to produce majority governments? Give two reasons.
Hint
Seat bonus; small parties squeezed.
Answer
(1) The leading party, by coming first in many constituencies, wins a share of seats larger than its share of votes (a 'seat bonus'), often enough for a majority. (2) Small parties with scattered support win few seats, so voters tend to favour larger parties; this concentrates seats in one or two parties.
Q9 · 8 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
[8] (a) Explain the meaning of Universal Adult Franchise and four reasons for its widespread acceptance. [5]
(b) Explain the meaning of the First Past the Post system with an example. [3]Hint
(a) definition plus E-S-P-E-P; (b) plurality.
Answer
(a) Universal Adult Franchise is the right of every adult citizen above the minimum age to vote without discrimination of caste, religion, race, sex, wealth or education (Article 326 in India; age 18). It is accepted because it ensures political equality, expresses popular sovereignty and legitimacy, lets every section protect its interests, and educates citizens while allowing peaceful change of government. (b) Under First Past the Post, single-member constituencies elect the candidate who polls more votes than any rival. If A gets 40, B 35 and C 25 per cent, A wins though most voted against A. It is used for Lok Sabha elections.
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.What is the voting age in India?Show answer
18 years (61st Amendment, 1988).
2.Which US amendment gave women the vote?Show answer
The 19th Amendment (1920).
3.Give an example of a single-party state.Show answer
China (Communist Party).
4.Which party system does India have?Show answer
A multi-party system.
5.What does 'plurality' mean in FPTP?Show answer
More votes than any other candidate, not necessarily more than half.
Best order to study it
- Universal adult franchise: meaning, India's provisions, reasons for acceptance.
- FPTP and PR: meaning with examples.
- Political party: meaning and elements.
- Party systems: meaning and merits with examples.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- Franchise = right to vote; universal adult franchise = all adult citizens, no discrimination; Article 326; age 18.
- Reasons: equality, sovereignty, legitimacy, protection of interests, political education, peaceful change.
- FPTP: single-member seats; plurality wins (Lok Sabha).
- PR: seats proportional to votes; list system, STV (Rajya Sabha, President).
- Party: organised group, common programme, power through elections.
- Single (China): quick, stable. Bi (USA, UK): stable, clear choice, strong opposition. Multi (India): represents diversity, wide choice, consensus.
Franchise and Representation: frequently asked questions
Do I need the demerits of FPTP and PR?
No. The syllabus asks for the meaning only of both systems. Knowing how FPTP can give a majority of seats on a minority of votes helps with data questions.
Do I need the demerits of party systems?
No. The syllabus says meaning and merits only.
Is the USA strictly a two-party system?
It is a bi-party system in practice: Democrats and Republicans dominate, but other parties exist legally.
Based on: CISCE ISC 2027 Political Science (852) syllabus; CISCE ISC 2027 Political Science (852) specimen question paper and answer key; CISCE Analysis of Pupil Performance, ISC Political Science (852), 2025; CISCE Analysis of Pupil Performance, ISC Political Science (852), 2024