Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939-1947), ISC Class 12 History
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Between 1939 and 1947 the British offered India dominion status in stages (August Offer, Cripps Mission) while Congress launched Quit India and Bose led the INA. After the war a weakened Britain sent the Cabinet Mission, fixed a deadline on 20 February 1947 and partitioned India under the Mountbatten Plan and the Indian Independence Act.
What Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947) is about
This chapter is the last stretch of the freedom struggle, from the outbreak of the Second World War in September 1939 to the transfer of power on 15 August 1947. The ISC syllabus divides it into three parts.
1. The national movement during the war. Linlithgow declared India a belligerent without consulting Indian leaders, and the Congress ministries resigned in October-November 1939. To win Indian support the British made the August Offer (1940) and sent the Cripps Mission (1942). Both were rejected, and the failure of Cripps led straight to the Quit India Resolution of 8 August 1942, a mass upsurge that was crushed but changed the terms of the struggle.
2. Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army. Bose reorganised the INA in South-East Asia in 1943, set up the Provisional Government of Free India and fought alongside the Japanese on the Imphal-Kohima front. The army was defeated, but the INA trials of 1945-46 roused the whole country.
3. The transfer of power (1945-1947). A Labour government, a war-weakened economy and unrest in the armed forces changed British attitudes. The Cabinet Mission (1946) tried to keep India united; its failure, the Direct Action Day killings and a deadlock in the Interim Government led to Attlee's declaration of 20 February 1947, the Mountbatten Plan of 3 June 1947 and the Indian Independence Act of July 1947.
Examiners repeatedly report that candidates mix up the proposals of the Cripps Mission, the Cabinet Mission and the Mountbatten Plan. The single most useful thing you can do for this chapter is to learn the three plans side by side, as the comparison table and memory tricks on this page set out.
Weightage: CISCE publishes no chapter or unit weightage for ISC History. Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947) is part of Section A: Indian History, 1 of the 2027 syllabus and can be asked anywhere in the 80-mark Paper I (Section A 16 one-mark items, Section B 4-mark short answers, Section C 8-mark long answers).Source: CISCE ISC History (851) syllabus, examination year 2027; ISC 2025 specimen question paper
Key concepts
- The August Offer (8 August 1940): reasons, proposals and rejection
Reasons behind the offer
- The war had turned against Britain: France fell in June 1940 and Britain stood almost alone, so Indian men, money and materials were vital.
- The Congress ministries had resigned in 1939, and the Congress (at Poona, July 1940) offered to co-operate in the war if a provisional national government was set up at the Centre.
- Britain wanted to keep India quiet and win the support of Indian parties without giving up real power.
Proposals (made by Viceroy Linlithgow)
1. Dominion status was accepted as the objective for India, with no date fixed.
2. The Viceroy's Executive Council would be expanded to include more Indians, and a War Advisory Council would be set up.
3. After the war a body representing Indians would be set up to frame the new constitution.
4. No constitution would be adopted, and no power transferred, without the consent of the minorities.Why it was rejected
- The Congress wanted complete independence and a national government now, not vague dominion status later.
- The minorities' clause gave the Muslim League a virtual veto over any settlement.
- The Muslim League welcomed the veto but rejected the offer because it did not accept Pakistan.
Result: Gandhi launched the Individual Satyagraha in October 1940 (Vinoba Bhave was the first satyagrahi, Jawaharlal Nehru the second), a limited protest against India being dragged into the war.
Worked example
[4] Why did the British Government make the August Offer, and why did the Congress reject it? (Understanding)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Reason 1: after the fall of France in 1940 Britain urgently needed Indian co-operation in the war - 1 mark.
- Reason 2: to end the deadlock after the Congress ministries resigned and to answer the Congress's offer of conditional support - 1 mark.
- Rejection 1: it offered only dominion status at an unspecified date instead of independence or a national government now - 1 mark.
- Rejection 2: the promise that nothing would be done without the minorities' consent gave the League a veto over India's future - 1 mark.
Answer: The offer was made because, after the fall of France, Britain badly needed Indian help in the war and wanted to end the political deadlock created by the resignation of the Congress ministries. The Congress rejected it because it promised only dominion status at some unstated date, gave no national government during the war, and handed the minorities, especially the Muslim League, a veto over any constitutional settlement.
- The Cripps Mission (March-April 1942): why it came, its proposals and why it failed
Why the Mission came
- Japan had entered the war (December 1941), captured Malaya and Singapore (February 1942) and Rangoon (March 1942), and was approaching India's eastern frontier.
- The USA (President Roosevelt) and China (Chiang Kai-shek) pressed Britain to win Indian support; the Labour members of Churchill's War Cabinet also wanted a gesture.
- Britain needed active Indian co-operation for the defence of India.
Sir Stafford Cripps, a member of the War Cabinet, arrived in March 1942.
Proposals
1. After the war India would become a Dominion (an Indian Union), free even to leave the Commonwealth.
2. After the war a constitution-making body would be set up: members elected by the provincial legislatures through proportional representation, plus members nominated by the princely states.
3. Any province not willing to accept the new constitution could stay out and frame its own constitution, with the same status as the Union.
4. A treaty between Britain and the constitution-making body would protect racial and religious minorities.
5. Meanwhile Britain would keep control of the defence of India; Indian leaders would be invited into the Viceroy's Executive Council.Why almost every party rejected it
- Congress: it offered dominion status, not independence; nothing was offered now; defence stayed with the British; the princes' nominees would not represent the people; the right of provinces to opt out threatened the unity of India. Gandhi called the offer a 'post-dated cheque' (the phrase 'on a crashing bank' was added by others).
- Muslim League: Pakistan was not openly conceded; the constitution-making body would decide by a joint vote in which Muslims would be outvoted.
- Sikhs feared being cut off from Punjab if it opted out; the Depressed Classes, Christians and Anglo-Indians felt their interests were not safeguarded; the Hindu Mahasabha opposed the opt-out clause.
Cripps withdrew the offer and left in April 1942. Its failure convinced Gandhi that the British would not part with power and led directly to the Quit India Resolution.
Worked example
[4] State any four reasons why the Congress rejected the Cripps proposals. (Analysis)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- It offered dominion status after the war, not full independence - 1 mark.
- There was no immediate transfer of power; defence stayed under British control - 1 mark.
- Princely states' representatives would be nominated by rulers, not elected by the people - 1 mark.
- The right of provinces to stay out of the Union opened the way to the break-up of India - 1 mark.
Answer: The Congress rejected the Cripps proposals because (1) they offered only dominion status, and that after the war; (2) no real power was transferred during the war and defence stayed with the British; (3) the princely states would send nominees of the rulers, not elected representatives; and (4) the provinces' right to stay out of the Indian Union threatened the unity of the country.
- The Quit India Movement (1942): resolution, course, suppression and significance
Why Gandhi demanded immediate freedom
- The failure of Cripps showed that Britain would not part with power.
- The British had abandoned Malaya, Singapore and Burma; Gandhi feared India might share their fate and come under a new imperialist, Japan.
- He argued that the British presence invited Japanese attack; a free India would be better able to defend itself.
- Rising prices, war-time shortages and racial discrimination during the evacuation from Burma had made people angry.
The Resolution: on 8 August 1942 the All India Congress Committee, meeting at Gowalia Tank in Bombay, passed the Quit India Resolution, demanding an immediate end of British rule and sanctioning a mass struggle on non-violent lines. Gandhi gave the call 'Do or Die'.
Course
- In the early hours of 9 August the government arrested Gandhi and the top Congress leaders; the Congress was banned.
- Leaderless, the people rose spontaneously: hartals, strikes in factories and colleges, attacks on railway lines, telegraph wires, police stations and post offices.
- Underground activity was led by Jayaprakash Narayan, Ram Manohar Lohia and Aruna Asaf Ali (who hoisted the flag at Gowalia Tank on 9 August); Usha Mehta ran an underground Congress Radio.
- Parallel governments were set up at Ballia (UP, under Chittu Pandey), Tamluk in Midnapore (Bengal, the Jatiya Sarkar) and Satara (Maharashtra, the Prati Sarkar).
- Students, peasants, workers and women took a leading part. In February 1943 Gandhi went on a 21-day fast in prison.
Suppression: the government used the army and police, firing on crowds, mass arrests (tens of thousands of people were jailed), collective fines on villages, public floggings and even machine-gunning from aircraft. By the end of 1942 the movement was largely crushed, though underground activity continued.
Significance
1. It showed the depth of nationalist feeling and the people's readiness to sacrifice.
2. After 1942 independence was no longer a question of whether but of when; the British realised that India could not be held against the will of its people.
3. Ordinary people, youth and women took the lead when leaders were in jail.
4. It weakened the loyalty of the administration and police at the lower levels.
5. The Muslim League gained ground while the Congress was banned, and the Communist Party, which supported the war effort, opposed the movement.Worked example
[4] Give any four reasons why the Quit India Movement is regarded as a turning point in the freedom struggle. (Evaluate)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- It was a mass, largely spontaneous upsurge involving students, peasants, workers and women - 1 mark.
- It made immediate independence the demand; after it, the question was only when Britain would leave - 1 mark.
- Parallel governments at Ballia, Tamluk and Satara showed the people's capacity to govern themselves - 1 mark.
- The British realised they could not rule India for long against popular will, especially after the war - 1 mark.
Answer: Quit India was a turning point because it was a mass upsurge led by ordinary people when leaders were in jail; it put immediate independence on the agenda; parallel governments at Ballia, Tamluk and Satara showed Indians could run their own affairs; and its scale convinced the British that India could not be held against the will of its people once the war ended.
- Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army
Origins
- The first INA was formed in 1942 by Captain Mohan Singh from Indian prisoners of war taken by the Japanese after the fall of Singapore, with the support of Rash Behari Bose and the Indian Independence League (Bangkok Conference, June 1942). It ran into differences with the Japanese.
- Subhas Chandra Bose escaped from house arrest in Calcutta in January 1941, reached Germany, and travelled by submarine to South-East Asia, arriving in Singapore in July 1943.
Bose's organisation of the INA
- He took command of the INA (Azad Hind Fauj) and enlisted Indian soldiers and civilians in South-East Asia.
- On 21 October 1943 he set up the Provisional Government of Free India (Azad Hind) at Singapore; it declared war on Britain and the USA and was recognised by the Axis powers.
- Brigades were named after Gandhi, Nehru and Azad, and a women's regiment, the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, was led by Captain Lakshmi Swaminathan.
- Slogans: 'Delhi Chalo', 'Jai Hind' and 'Give me blood and I will give you freedom'.
- The Japanese handed over the Andaman and Nicobar Islands to his government; Bose renamed them Shaheed and Swaraj.
Operations
- INA units fought in the Arakan and joined the Japanese offensive on Imphal and Kohima in 1944. The INA flag was hoisted at Moirang in Manipur in April 1944.
- The offensive failed: the monsoon, shortage of food, arms and medicine, lack of air cover and the Allied counter-attack forced a retreat.
Defeat: after the Allied reconquest of Burma in 1945 and Japan's surrender in August 1945, the INA surrendered. Bose is believed to have died in an air crash at Taipei (Taihoku) on 18 August 1945.
Significance
1. It brought Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs together under one flag and included women soldiers.
2. The INA trials at the Red Fort (November 1945) of Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgal and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon, defended by Bhulabhai Desai, Nehru and others, caused protests across India; the sentences were remitted.
3. It shook the loyalty of the Indian armed forces, a factor behind the Royal Indian Navy mutiny of February 1946.
4. It convinced the British that they could no longer rely on the Indian army to hold India.Worked example
[4] Discuss any four contributions of the INA to India's freedom struggle. (Understanding)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Under Bose it formed the Provisional Government of Free India (October 1943) and declared war on Britain - 1 mark.
- Its slogans 'Delhi Chalo' and 'Jai Hind' inspired Indians; it united soldiers of all religions and included a women's regiment - 1 mark.
- It fought on Indian soil at Imphal-Kohima and hoisted the national flag at Moirang in 1944 - 1 mark.
- The Red Fort trials of 1945 turned INA soldiers into national heroes and shook the loyalty of the armed forces - 1 mark.
Answer: The INA set up a Provisional Government of Free India and declared war on Britain; it gave India the slogans 'Delhi Chalo' and 'Jai Hind' and united Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and women in one army; it carried the struggle onto Indian soil at Imphal and Kohima, hoisting the tricolour at Moirang; and the Red Fort trials made its soldiers national heroes and undermined the loyalty of the Indian forces to the Raj.
- Why the British attitude changed after the Second World War
1. Change of government: the Labour Party under Clement Attlee came to power in July 1945; it was more sympathetic to Indian independence.
2. Britain was exhausted: the war had left it in debt (it owed India large sterling balances) and dependent on American loans; it could no longer afford to hold an empire by force.
3. Changed balance of world power: the USA and USSR, the new superpowers, opposed colonialism; the United Nations Charter spoke of self-determination.
4. The armed forces could no longer be relied on: the INA trials (1945-46) and the Royal Indian Navy mutiny in Bombay (February 1946), along with unrest in the air force and the army, showed that loyalty was cracking.
5. Mass upsurge in India: Quit India, strikes, peasant movements and the popular reaction to the INA trials showed India could not be governed against the people's will.
6. A shrinking and war-weary British civil service in India had fewer officers to run the administration.Worked example
[4] State any four reasons for the change in the attitude of the British Government towards India after the Second World War. (Analysis)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The Labour government of Attlee, elected in 1945, favoured granting independence - 1 mark.
- Britain was economically and militarily exhausted by the war - 1 mark.
- The INA trials and the RIN mutiny of 1946 showed the armed forces were no longer reliable - 1 mark.
- The USA, the USSR and the UN were against colonial rule; world opinion had turned - 1 mark.
Answer: (1) The Labour Party under Attlee, which came to power in 1945, favoured Indian independence. (2) The war had left Britain economically drained and unable to hold India by force. (3) The INA trials and the naval mutiny of 1946 showed that Indian troops could no longer be relied upon. (4) The new superpowers and the United Nations opposed colonialism, so world opinion favoured India.
- The Cabinet Mission Plan (16 May 1946): aims and provisions
Members: Lord Pethick-Lawrence (Secretary of State for India), Sir Stafford Cripps and A. V. Alexander. They arrived in March 1946.
Aims
- To reach agreement with Indian leaders on the method of framing a constitution.
- To set up a constitution-making body.
- To set up an Interim (Executive) Government with the support of the main parties.
Major provisions
1. The demand for a separate, sovereign Pakistan was rejected.
2. A Union of India of British India and the princely states, dealing with foreign affairs, defence and communications and able to raise finance for these; all other powers with the provinces and states.
3. Provinces would be placed in three groups: Group A (Hindu-majority provinces: Madras, Bombay, United Provinces, Bihar, Central Provinces, Orissa), Group B (Punjab, North-West Frontier Province, Sind) and Group C (Bengal, Assam). Groups could frame their own constitutions.
4. After the first general elections a province could leave its group; after ten years any province could ask for the constitution to be reconsidered.
5. A Constituent Assembly of 389 members: 292 from the provinces, elected by the provincial assemblies by proportional representation in three communities (General, Muslim, Sikh), 93 from the princely states and 4 from the Chief Commissioners' provinces.
6. An Interim Government with the support of the major parties, all portfolios held by Indians.
7. India would be free to remain in or leave the Commonwealth.Reactions
- The Congress accepted the long-term plan (it kept India united) but read grouping as optional and refused parity with the League in the Interim Government.
- The Muslim League accepted the plan in June 1946, seeing compulsory grouping as the basis of Pakistan, but withdrew its acceptance in July after Nehru said the Congress would be free to change the plan in the Assembly. It called for Direct Action on 16 August 1946, which led to the Great Calcutta Killings.
- An Interim Government under Nehru took office on 2 September 1946; the League joined in October 1946 but obstructed its work and boycotted the Constituent Assembly, which first met on 9 December 1946.
Worked example
[4] State any four major provisions of the Cabinet Mission Plan. (Recall)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A Union of India of British India and the states, controlling defence, foreign affairs and communications - 1 mark.
- Provinces grouped into A, B and C, with the right to leave a group after the first elections - 1 mark.
- A Constituent Assembly elected by provincial assemblies by proportional representation on a community basis - 1 mark.
- An Interim Government of Indians with the support of the major parties - 1 mark.
Answer: (1) An Indian Union of British India and the princely states, in charge of defence, foreign affairs and communications, with residual powers in the provinces. (2) Provinces grouped into Sections A, B and C, which could frame group constitutions; a province could leave its group after the first elections. (3) A 389-member Constituent Assembly elected by the provincial legislatures by proportional representation in three communities, plus members from the states. (4) An Interim Government formed by Indian leaders with the support of the major parties.
- Attlee's Declaration, the Mountbatten Plan and the Indian Independence Act (1947)
Attlee's Declaration (20 February 1947)
- Britain would transfer power to Indian hands by a date not later than June 1948.
- If no fully representative constitution was ready by then, power would be handed either to a central government or, in some areas, to existing provincial governments, or in any other reasonable way.
- Lord Mountbatten would replace Lord Wavell as Viceroy.
The deadline forced the parties to decide; the clause on handing power to provinces hinted that partition was possible.
The Mountbatten Plan (3 June 1947): main features
1. India would be divided into two dominions, India and Pakistan.
2. The legislative assemblies of Punjab and Bengal would meet in two parts (Muslim-majority and other districts); if either part voted for partition, the province would be divided.
3. Sind's assembly would decide which Constituent Assembly to join; a referendum would be held in the North-West Frontier Province and in Sylhet district of Assam.
4. A Boundary Commission would mark the boundaries in Punjab and Bengal (it was chaired by Sir Cyril Radcliffe).
5. Paramountcy would lapse; princely states could join either dominion (or, in theory, stay independent).
6. Power would be transferred on 15 August 1947, well before the June 1948 deadline.Why the parties accepted it
- Congress: communal riots after Direct Action Day showed that a united India could only be held by force; the League's obstruction in the Interim Government made joint rule impossible; a smaller India with a strong Centre was better than a weak federation; partition removed separate electorates and the League's veto; delay risked civil war and the break-up of the country by the princes.
- Muslim League: the plan conceded Pakistan, even though a smaller ('truncated') one.
- Sikhs: accepted the division of Punjab, which kept East Punjab in India.
The Indian Independence Act (passed by the British Parliament in July 1947; came into force on 15 August 1947)
1. Two independent dominions, India and Pakistan, from 15 August 1947.
2. Each dominion would have a Governor-General appointed by the Crown on the advice of its own government.
3. The Constituent Assembly of each dominion became sovereign and acted as its legislature until a new constitution was made; the British Parliament lost all authority over the dominions.
4. The office of Secretary of State for India was abolished.
5. British paramountcy over the princely states lapsed, and treaties with them ended.
6. Until new constitutions were made, each dominion was governed under the Government of India Act, 1935, modified as necessary; the Governor-General no longer had power to veto bills or act in his discretion.
7. The British monarch dropped the title 'Emperor of India'.Worked example
[4] What was the most significant change that the Mountbatten Plan made to the Cabinet Mission proposals? Give three other features of the Mountbatten Plan. (Understanding)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Most significant change: India would be partitioned and a separate dominion of Pakistan created, whereas the Cabinet Mission had rejected Pakistan - 1 mark.
- Punjab and Bengal assemblies would vote on dividing their provinces - 1 mark.
- Referendums in the North-West Frontier Province and Sylhet; Sind's assembly to choose - 1 mark.
- A Boundary Commission to draw borders; power to be transferred on 15 August 1947 - 1 mark.
Answer: The Cabinet Mission had kept India united; the Mountbatten Plan partitioned it into two dominions, India and Pakistan. It also provided that the Punjab and Bengal assemblies would vote on partitioning those provinces, that referendums would be held in the NWFP and Sylhet while Sind's assembly chose its dominion, and that a Boundary Commission would fix the borders before power was transferred on 15 August 1947.
Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947) in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
The Cripps offer as a 'post-dated cheque'
Suppose an employer tells a worker who is being asked to work double shifts during a crisis: 'Help us now, and after the crisis is over you will be made a partner. Until then I keep the keys, and any department may break away from the firm if it likes.'
How does this resemble the Cripps proposals, and why would the worker be unwilling to accept?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The reward (partnership) is promised only after the crisis, as dominion status was promised only after the war.
- The employer keeps the keys now, as Britain kept control of defence.
- Departments may break away, as provinces could stay out of the Indian Union.
- A promise payable later by a weak firm is worth little: Gandhi's 'post-dated cheque'.
Answer: Like the Cripps offer, the employer asks for help now but pays later, keeps real control in the meantime and allows the firm to break up. The worker, like the Congress, would refuse because there is no present transfer of power and the promise threatens the unity of the whole.
Memory hook: Cripps = cheque for later, keys kept now, provinces may walk out.
Why a fixed deadline forces decisions
Imagine a housing society where two groups have argued for months about how to share a building. The owner announces: 'I will hand over the building by a fixed date next year, to whoever can agree, or else floor by floor to the existing committees.'
Which 1947 announcement does this resemble, and what effect would it have on the two groups?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Attlee's declaration of 20 February 1947 set a date (not later than June 1948) for British withdrawal.
- It said power might go to provincial governments if no agreed constitution existed.
- A deadline removed the option of waiting and made a division more likely.
Answer: It resembles Attlee's declaration of 20 February 1947. A fixed deadline, with the threat of handing power piece by piece, pressed both groups to settle quickly and made a division (partition) the likely outcome if they still could not agree.
Memory hook: Attlee set the clock; the clock forced the split.
Leaderless movements and parallel governments
Suppose a student union's entire committee is suspended on the night before a planned protest. The next morning students in different hostels organise their own protests, and one hostel even sets up its own mess and rules without the warden.
Which features of the Quit India Movement does this illustrate?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The arrest of Gandhi and the Congress leaders on 9 August 1942 left the movement leaderless.
- People acted spontaneously and locally, often in different ways.
- Some areas, such as Ballia, Tamluk and Satara, set up parallel governments.
Answer: It illustrates the spontaneous, leaderless character of Quit India after the leaders' arrest, the varied local forms of protest, and the parallel governments set up at Ballia, Tamluk and Satara.
Memory hook: Leaders in jail, people in charge: Ballia, Tamluk, Satara.
Topics in this chapter
Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947): key facts
- August Offer
- 8 August 1940, Viceroy Linlithgow
- Dominion status (no date), expanded Executive Council, minorities' veto; led to Individual Satyagraha (October 1940).
- Cripps Mission
- March-April 1942, Sir Stafford Cripps
- Dominion status after the war; provinces may opt out; defence with Britain; 'post-dated cheque'.
- Quit India Resolution
- 8 August 1942, Gowalia Tank, Bombay
- 'Do or Die'; leaders arrested 9 August; parallel governments at Ballia, Tamluk, Satara.
- Provisional Government of Free India
- 21 October 1943, Singapore
- Bose; 'Delhi Chalo', 'Jai Hind'; flag at Moirang, April 1944.
- INA trials and RIN mutiny
- Red Fort trials November 1945; RIN mutiny February 1946
- Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgal, G. S. Dhillon.
- Cabinet Mission Plan
- 16 May 1946: Pethick-Lawrence, Cripps, A. V. Alexander
- Union with three subjects; groups A, B, C; 389-member Constituent Assembly; Interim Government.
- Direct Action Day
- 16 August 1946
- Great Calcutta Killings.
- Attlee's Declaration
- 20 February 1947
- Power to be transferred by June 1948; Mountbatten to replace Wavell.
- Mountbatten Plan and Independence Act
- Plan 3 June 1947; Act July 1947; independence 15 August 1947
- Partition into two dominions; paramountcy lapses; Secretary of State abolished.
How the board asks Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947)
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Section A one-mark items (MCQ, assertion-reason, identify the plan) | Which plan proposed dividing Punjab and Bengal? Name the resolution of 8 August 1942. An assertion-reason pair linking a British action with an Indian response. | Match each feature to its plan with the comparison table: opting-out provinces = Cripps; groups A-B-C = Cabinet Mission; partition of Punjab and Bengal = Mountbatten. For assertion-reason, check whether R actually causes A. |
| Section B four-mark short answer, often on an extract or quotation | With reference to an extract (for example from Gandhi, or a newspaper of 1942 or 1947), state any four reasons, proposals or features. | Write four distinct, numbered points, each a full sentence, and tie at least one point to the extract. Do not list the clauses of a plan when reasons for accepting it are asked. |
| Section C eight-mark long answer, usually (a) 4 + (b) 4 | (a) Why did the Cripps Mission come and what did it propose? (b) Why was it rejected by the parties? Or: (a) contributions of the INA; (b) reasons for the change in British attitude. | Treat each half as a separate four-point answer with its own sub-heading. In 'reactions of parties' questions, write points for every party named. |
Tricks to remember Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947)
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
Three plans, three signatures
Cripps = 'Opt-out' (provinces may stay out); Cabinet Mission = 'ABC' (three groups, no Pakistan); Mountbatten = 'Cut' (Punjab and Bengal divided, two dominions).
Use it when: Prevents the plan mix-up that examiners reported in both 2024 and 2025.
Dates ladder 40-42-43-46-47
1940 August Offer; 1942 Cripps and Quit India (both in one year: March, then August); 1943 Azad Hind; 1946 Cabinet Mission and Direct Action; 1947 Attlee (Feb), Mountbatten (June), Act (July), freedom (August).
Use it when: Sequencing questions and timelines.
Quit India parallel governments: 'BTS'
Ballia (UP), Tamluk (Bengal), Satara (Maharashtra).
Use it when: Course of the movement.
Cabinet Mission members: 'PCA'
Pethick-Lawrence, Cripps, Alexander.
Use it when: Recall MCQs.
Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947): board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: Which plan divided the provinces · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Which one of the following proposed that the legislatures of Punjab and Bengal would decide whether their provinces should be partitioned?
(a) The August Offer
(b) The Cripps proposals
(c) The Cabinet Mission Plan
(d) The Mountbatten Plan
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The August Offer and Cripps did not deal with dividing provinces.
- The Cabinet Mission kept provinces whole and grouped them.
- The Mountbatten Plan let the two parts of each assembly vote on partition.
Answer: (d) The Mountbatten Plan.
Example 2: Assertion-reason: Cripps and Quit India · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level
Assertion (A): The All India Congress Committee passed the Quit India Resolution in August 1942.
Reason (R): The Cripps Mission had shown the Congress that Britain was not willing to transfer real power during the war.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A is true: the resolution was passed on 8 August 1942.
- R is true: Cripps offered only post-war dominion status with defence kept by Britain.
- The failure of Cripps led directly to the demand that the British quit at once, so R explains A.
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Example 3: Reasons for the Quit India demand · 4 marks · Source-basedBoard level
[4] 'We shall either free India or die in the attempt.' In the light of this call, explain why Gandhi demanded the immediate withdrawal of the British from India in 1942. (Understanding)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The failure of the Cripps Mission convinced Gandhi that Britain would not part with power willingly.
- Britain had abandoned Malaya, Singapore and Burma; Gandhi feared India would be left to Japan in the same way.
- He held that the British presence itself invited a Japanese invasion; a free India could decide its own defence.
- War-time price rises, shortages and racial discrimination against Indian evacuees from Burma had created popular anger he could channel.
Answer: Gandhi demanded immediate withdrawal because (1) Cripps had shown Britain would not transfer power; (2) the British retreat from Malaya, Singapore and Burma suggested India could be abandoned to a new imperialist, Japan; (3) the British presence invited a Japanese attack, and only a free India could organise its own defence; and (4) war-time hardships and discrimination had made the people ready for a final struggle, which he summed up as 'Do or Die'.
Example 4: Rejection of Cripps by all parties · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
[4] Explain why the Cripps proposals failed to satisfy the Muslim League and two other groups besides the Congress. (Analysis)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Muslim League: Pakistan was not openly conceded; the right of provinces to opt out was not enough.
- Muslim League: the constitution-making body would decide by a joint vote in which Muslims would be a minority.
- Sikhs: they feared that if Punjab opted out they would be cut off from India and placed under Muslim domination.
- Depressed Classes (and Christians, Anglo-Indians): they felt the proposals gave them no adequate safeguards.
Answer: The League rejected Cripps because Pakistan was not expressly accepted and the constitution-making body, deciding by a common vote, would be dominated by non-Muslims. The Sikhs objected that an opt-out by Punjab would separate them from India, and the Depressed Classes (with the Christians and Anglo-Indians) felt their interests had no proper safeguard.
Example 5: Cabinet Mission and Congress-League reactions · 8 marks · Long answerHarder board level
[8] (a) State the aims of the Cabinet Mission and any two of its provisions. [4]
(b) Briefly discuss two reactions each of the Congress and the Muslim League to the Plan. [4] (Analysis)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (a) Aims: to agree with Indian leaders on how to frame a constitution and to set up a constitution-making body (1).
- (a) Aim: to form an Interim Government with the support of the main parties (1).
- (a) Provision: an Indian Union of British India and the states for defence, foreign affairs and communications (1).
- (a) Provision: provinces grouped into A, B and C; Pakistan rejected (1).
- (b) Congress: accepted the long-term plan because it preserved unity and joined the Constituent Assembly elections (1).
- (b) Congress: treated grouping as optional and opposed parity with the League in the Interim Government (1).
- (b) League: accepted in June 1946, seeing compulsory grouping as the seed of Pakistan (1).
- (b) League: withdrew acceptance in July 1946 after Nehru's statement and called for Direct Action on 16 August 1946 (1).
Answer: (a) The Mission aimed to agree on a method of framing the constitution, to set up a constitution-making body and to form an Interim Government backed by the main parties. It proposed a Union of India controlling defence, foreign affairs and communications, and grouping of provinces into A, B and C, rejecting a sovereign Pakistan. (b) The Congress accepted the long-term plan as it kept India united, but held grouping to be optional and rejected parity in the Interim Government. The League first accepted it, reading compulsory grouping as a step to Pakistan, then withdrew its acceptance in July 1946 and launched Direct Action on 16 August 1946.
Example 6: Evaluating the INA · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
[4] 'The INA failed as a military force but succeeded as a political force.' Do you agree? Give four arguments. (Evaluate)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Military failure: the Imphal-Kohima offensive of 1944 failed for want of supplies, air cover and because of the monsoon; the INA surrendered in 1945.
- Political success: the Red Fort trials of 1945 made INA soldiers national heroes and united Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs in protest.
- Political success: the INA example shook the loyalty of the Indian armed forces, leading to unrest such as the RIN mutiny of 1946.
- Political success: the British concluded they could no longer rely on Indian soldiers, which hastened the transfer of power.
Answer: Yes. Militarily the INA failed: its 1944 advance on Imphal and Kohima collapsed through shortages, the monsoon and lack of air support, and it surrendered in 1945. Politically it succeeded: the Red Fort trials made its soldiers heroes across communities, its example eroded the loyalty of the Indian forces (seen in the RIN mutiny of 1946), and Britain realised it could no longer depend on the Indian army to hold India.
Example 7: Why Congress accepted partition · 8 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
[8] (a) Explain any four reasons why the Congress accepted the Mountbatten Plan though it had always opposed partition. [4]
(b) State any four provisions of the Indian Independence Act, 1947. [4] (Evaluate)
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- (a) The communal killings after Direct Action Day (August 1946) convinced leaders that partition was the only way to stop violence (1).
- (a) The League's obstruction in the Interim Government (for example over the 1947 budget) showed joint rule was unworkable (1).
- (a) A smaller India with a strong Centre was preferable to a weak federation held hostage by the League's veto; partition also ended separate electorates (1).
- (a) Delay risked civil war and the break-up of India by the princely states; quick transfer of power was essential (1).
- (b) Two dominions, India and Pakistan, from 15 August 1947 (1).
- (b) Each Constituent Assembly became sovereign and could make any law; the British Parliament lost authority (1).
- (b) Office of Secretary of State for India abolished; Governor-General to act on the advice of the dominion government (1).
- (b) Paramountcy over princely states lapsed; Government of India Act 1935 to apply, modified, until new constitutions (1).
Answer: (a) The Congress accepted partition because the communal violence after Direct Action Day made a united settlement impossible; the League's obstruction in the Interim Government showed the two could not govern together; a smaller but strong India free of separate electorates was better than a weak, deadlocked federation; and further delay risked civil war and the break-up of the country by the princes. (b) The Act created two dominions from 15 August 1947; made each Constituent Assembly sovereign and ended the British Parliament's authority; abolished the office of Secretary of State and made the Governor-General a constitutional head; and ended paramountcy over the princely states, with the 1935 Act applying, as modified, until new constitutions were made.
Case-study practice (Section D style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 8-mark question split into 2 + 2 + 4 marks.
A night of arrests (source-based)
Read the extract (a reconstructed newspaper report, written for practice) and answer the questions.
'Bombay, 9 August. Before dawn today the police called at the homes of the Mahatma and the members of the Working Committee, who had last evening approved a resolution calling on the British to withdraw. By noon a young woman had unfurled the national flag over the meeting ground, while crowds clashed with the police in several parts of the city. Reports from the countryside speak of telegraph wires cut and railway stations attacked.'
(i) · 2 marks
Name the resolution referred to and the place where it was passed. Name the young woman who hoisted the flag.
Answer
Answer: The Quit India Resolution, passed by the AICC at Gowalia Tank, Bombay, on 8 August 1942. The flag was hoisted by Aruna Asaf Ali.
1 mark for the resolution and place; 1 mark for Aruna Asaf Ali.
(ii) · 2 marks
Why did the movement turn violent in places though Gandhi had asked for non-violence?
Answer
Answer: With all the leaders arrested at once, there was no one to guide or restrain the people; anger at the arrests, war-time hardships and repression led to spontaneous attacks on symbols of government such as railways, telegraphs and police stations.
1 mark for leaderlessness; 1 mark for anger/repression.
(iii) · 4 marks
State four methods the government used to suppress the movement and assess its significance in two points.
Answer
Answer: Methods: mass arrests; firing on crowds and lathi charges; collective fines on villages; use of the army and even aerial machine-gunning. Significance: it showed the depth of popular determination and made immediate independence the agenda; the British realised India could not be ruled for long against the people's will.
Half a mark per method (2) and 1 mark per point of significance (2).
Three plans compared (data-based)
Study the table and answer.
Plan X: India to become a dominion after the war; any province may stay out of the Union; Britain keeps defence.
Plan Y: no sovereign Pakistan; provinces grouped into three sections; a constituent assembly elected on a community basis; an interim government.
Plan Z: two dominions; provincial assemblies of two provinces to vote on division; a boundary commission; power transferred within weeks.
(i) · 3 marks
Identify Plans X, Y and Z with their years.
Answer
Answer: X = the Cripps proposals (1942); Y = the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946); Z = the Mountbatten Plan (1947).
1 mark each.
(ii) · 2 marks
Which feature of Plan X already contained the seed of partition? Explain.
Answer
Answer: The right of any province to stay out of the Union and frame its own constitution; it implied that Muslim-majority provinces could form a separate state, conceding the principle of Pakistan.
1 mark for the feature, 1 for the explanation.
(iii) · 3 marks
Why did Plan Y fail, making Plan Z necessary? Give three reasons.
Answer
Answer: (1) The Congress and the League read grouping differently (optional versus compulsory). (2) The League withdrew its acceptance in July 1946 and launched Direct Action, leading to communal killings. (3) The League joined the Interim Government only to obstruct it and boycotted the Constituent Assembly, creating a deadlock.
1 mark per reason.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
[4] Why the political parties turned down the Cripps offer (four reasons). (4 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Congress: dominion status, not independence; nothing now. | 1 |
| Congress: defence stays British; princes' nominees; opt-out threatens unity. | 1 |
| Muslim League: Pakistan not clearly conceded; joint voting. | 1 |
| Sikhs / Depressed Classes / others: inadequate safeguards. | 1 |
[4] Discuss any four contributions of the INA to the freedom struggle. (4 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Provisional Government of Free India, 1943; war on Britain. | 1 |
| 'Delhi Chalo', 'Jai Hind'; unity of communities; women's regiment. | 1 |
| Fought at Imphal-Kohima; flag at Moirang; Andaman and Nicobar. | 1 |
| Red Fort trials stirred the nation and shook the armed forces. | 1 |
[8] (a) Main features of the Mountbatten Plan. [4] (b) Reasons for its acceptance by the Congress. [4] (8 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| (a) Two dominions, India and Pakistan. | 1 |
| (a) Punjab and Bengal assemblies to vote on partition. | 1 |
| (a) Referendum in NWFP and Sylhet; Sind assembly to decide. | 1 |
| (a) Boundary Commission; paramountcy lapses; power on 15 August 1947. | 1 |
| (b) Communal violence after Direct Action Day. | 1 |
| (b) League's obstruction in the Interim Government. | 1 |
| (b) Strong Centre and end of separate electorates in a smaller India. | 1 |
| (b) Delay risked civil war and balkanisation by the princes. | 1 |
Where students lose marks in Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947)
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Mixing up the Cripps, Cabinet Mission and Mountbatten proposals
CISCE examiners' comments, 2024: candidates 'Confused Cripps Mission proposals with those of the Cabinet Mission and Mountbatten Plan'. In 2025 they again 'Confused the Mountbatten Plan with the Cabinet Mission Plan'.
Wrong working
Cripps Mission: provinces grouped into A, B and C.
Right working
Cripps: provinces could opt out of the Union. Grouping into A, B and C belongs to the Cabinet Mission.
Do this: Learn the plans as a table with one signature feature each: Opt-out, ABC, Cut.
Usually costs: Up to all 4 marks of a short answer.
Mistake: Giving the terms of the Mountbatten Plan when reasons for accepting it are asked
CISCE examiners' comments, 2025: candidates 'Confused reasons for acceptance with specific clauses of the Plan' and 'Gave vague justifications such as "to come to power" without motives.'
Wrong working
The Congress accepted because India was to be divided into two dominions.
Right working
The Congress accepted because communal riots and the League's obstruction made a united India unworkable, and a strong Centre in a smaller India was preferable.
Do this: For 'why accepted', write causes (riots, deadlock, strong Centre, fear of delay), not clauses.
Usually costs: Most of the 4 marks.
Mistake: Answering about Bose when the INA's contributions are asked
CISCE examiners' comments, 2024: candidates 'Wrote about Subhash Chandra Bose instead of the INA'.
Do this: Write about what the army did: the Provisional Government, campaigns, the trials and the effect on the armed forces. Mention Bose only as its leader.
Usually costs: 2 or more marks.
Mistake: Giving only the Congress's reasons for rejecting Cripps
CISCE examiners' comments, 2024: candidates 'Mentioned reasons for rejection by Congress but not by other parties'.
Do this: When the question says 'almost all political parties', give at least one point each for the Congress, the League and another group (Sikhs, Depressed Classes, Hindu Mahasabha).
Usually costs: 1 or 2 marks.
Mistake: Unclear reasons for Gandhi's demand for immediate freedom
CISCE examiners' comments, 2024: candidates were 'Confused about the reasons for Gandhi's demand for immediate independence'.
Do this: Learn the four linked reasons: Cripps's failure, the fate of Malaya and Burma, the British presence inviting Japan, and popular discontent.
Usually costs: Up to 3 marks.
Mistake: Seeing two true statements but missing the link in assertion-reason
CISCE examiners' comments, 2025 (Q1(vi), on the resignation of the Congress ministries in 1939): candidates 'Recognised both statements as true but failed to see the cause-and-effect link between them.'
Do this: After checking A and R, ask: 'Did R make A happen?' If yes, choose (a).
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Practice questions on Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947)
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
The Individual Satyagraha of 1940 was launched in response to:
(a) the Cripps proposals
(b) the August Offer
(c) the Cabinet Mission Plan
(d) the Wavell PlanHint
1940 itself.
Answer
(b) The August Offer.
Q2 · 1 mark · Very short answerBoard level
Name the women's regiment of the INA and its commander.
Hint
A queen of 1857.
Answer
The Rani of Jhansi Regiment, commanded by Captain Lakshmi Swaminathan.
Q3 · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Arrange in chronological order: (P) Attlee's Declaration; (Q) Direct Action Day; (R) Cripps Mission; (S) Provisional Government of Free India.
(a) R, S, Q, P
(b) S, R, Q, P
(c) R, S, P, Q
(d) R, Q, S, PHint
1942, 1943, 1946, 1947.
Answer
(a) R (1942), S (1943), Q (August 1946), P (February 1947).
Q4 · 1 mark · Very short answerHarder board level
Which provision of the Indian Independence Act ended Britain's relationship with the princely states?
Hint
A doctrine that 'lapsed'.
Answer
The lapse of British paramountcy over the princely states (and of all treaties with them).
Q5 · 4 marks · Short answerBoard level
[4] Why did the Congress demand complete freedom at once in 1942 rather than wait for the end of the war? Give four reasons.
Hint
Cripps, Japan, British retreat, hardship.
Answer
(1) Cripps's failure showed Britain would not transfer power. (2) The Japanese advance to India's borders made a free India's own defence urgent. (3) The British had abandoned Malaya, Singapore and Burma and might do the same to India. (4) Inflation, shortages and discrimination in the war had made the people ready for a final struggle.
Q6 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
[4] Explain the significance of the Red Fort trials of the INA officers (1945-46).
Hint
Unity, defence lawyers, armed forces, British reaction.
Answer
(1) The trial of a Hindu (Sahgal), a Muslim (Shah Nawaz Khan) and a Sikh (Dhillon) together united all communities in protest. (2) The Congress formed a defence committee (Bhulabhai Desai, Nehru, Sapru), making the trials a national cause. (3) Demonstrations spread across India and into the armed forces, contributing to the RIN mutiny. (4) The government was forced to remit the sentences, showing it could no longer defy public opinion or rely on its soldiers.
Q7 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
[4] Attlee announced on 20 February 1947 that the British would leave India by June 1948. Analyse why this declaration made partition more likely.
Hint
Deadline plus the 'provincial governments' clause.
Answer
(1) A fixed deadline ended the hope of a long negotiation, so a quick solution was needed. (2) It said power might be handed to existing provincial governments if no agreed constitution was ready, which encouraged the League to seize power in Muslim-majority provinces. (3) It intensified the struggle for control of Punjab and Bengal and the communal violence there. (4) It brought in Mountbatten with a mandate to settle quickly, and the quickest settlement possible was division.
Q8 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
[4] Distinguish between the Cripps proposals and the Mountbatten Plan on four points.
Hint
Timing, unity, provinces, princely states.
Answer
(1) Cripps promised dominion status after the war; Mountbatten transferred power at once (15 August 1947). (2) Cripps envisaged one Indian Union that provinces could leave; Mountbatten created two dominions. (3) Cripps did not divide provinces; Mountbatten allowed Punjab and Bengal to be partitioned. (4) Cripps gave princely states nominated seats in the constitution body; under Mountbatten paramountcy lapsed and states chose which dominion to join.
Q9 · 8 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
[8] (a) Explain any four reasons for the failure of the INA's military campaign. [4]
(b) Evaluate the claim that the Quit India Movement, though crushed, was a success. [4]Hint
(a) supplies, weather, Japanese reverses, air power; (b) weigh both sides.
Answer
(a) (1) Shortage of food, arms, medicines and transport. (2) The monsoon of 1944 made movement impossible in Manipur and Burma. (3) The Japanese, on whom the INA depended, were losing the war and lacked air cover. (4) The Allied counter-offensive under superior air power drove them back from Imphal and Kohima. (b) It was crushed within months by mass arrests and force, and it did not win immediate freedom. But it showed the depth of national feeling, involved students, peasants and women on a vast scale, created parallel governments, and convinced Britain that India could not be held after the war; so as a political movement it succeeded.
Q10 · 8 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
[8] Assess the factors that compelled the British to transfer power in 1947 and explain why the Muslim League accepted a 'truncated' Pakistan.
Hint
Six factors plus two League reasons.
Answer
Factors: (1) a Labour government sympathetic to independence; (2) Britain's economic exhaustion after the war; (3) the INA trials and RIN mutiny showing the forces were unreliable; (4) mass anti-British feeling after Quit India; (5) pressure from the USA, the USSR and the UN; (6) a shrinking British civil service. The League accepted a smaller Pakistan because (1) it achieved the core demand of a separate Muslim homeland, and (2) holding out risked losing everything, since the Congress, the British and the Sikhs all insisted Punjab and Bengal be divided if India was.
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.Who was the first satyagrahi of the Individual Satyagraha (1940)?Show answer
Vinoba Bhave.
2.When and where was the Quit India Resolution passed?Show answer
8 August 1942, by the AICC at Gowalia Tank, Bombay.
3.Name the three parallel governments of 1942.Show answer
Ballia (UP), Tamluk (Midnapore, Bengal) and Satara (Maharashtra).
4.When was the Provisional Government of Free India proclaimed?Show answer
21 October 1943, at Singapore.
5.Name the three INA officers tried at the Red Fort.Show answer
Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgal and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon.
6.What deadline did Attlee announce on 20 February 1947?Show answer
Power would be transferred not later than June 1948.
7.Which groups formed Group B under the Cabinet Mission Plan?Show answer
Punjab, the North-West Frontier Province and Sind.
8.Which office did the Indian Independence Act abolish?Show answer
The Secretary of State for India.
Best order to study it
- Start with the 1939 crisis: India dragged into the war, Congress ministries resign.
- Learn the August Offer and the Cripps proposals with reasons for rejection by each party.
- Learn the Quit India Resolution, course, suppression and significance as four separate lists.
- Learn the INA: origins, Bose's organisation, operations, defeat and significance.
- Learn why British attitudes changed after 1945.
- Learn the Cabinet Mission (aims, provisions, reactions), then Attlee, Mountbatten and the 1947 Act.
- Finish by drawing the three-plan comparison table from memory.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- 1939: India declared at war without consultation; Congress ministries resign.
- August Offer 1940: dominion status (no date), bigger Executive Council, minorities' veto; rejected; Individual Satyagraha.
- Cripps 1942: dominion after the war, provinces may opt out, defence with Britain; rejected by all; 'post-dated cheque'.
- Quit India: 8 August 1942, 'Do or Die'; leaders arrested; spontaneous revolt; Ballia, Tamluk, Satara; crushed by force; made freedom inevitable.
- INA: Mohan Singh 1942; Bose takes over 1943; Azad Hind Government 21 October 1943; Imphal-Kohima 1944; surrender 1945; Red Fort trials.
- British change: Labour government, exhausted Britain, unreliable forces (INA trials, RIN mutiny 1946), world opinion.
- Cabinet Mission 1946: no Pakistan; Union for defence, foreign affairs, communications; groups A-B-C; 389-member Assembly; Interim Government; Direct Action 16 August 1946.
- Attlee 20 February 1947: leave by June 1948.
- Mountbatten 3 June 1947: two dominions; Punjab and Bengal divided by vote; referendums NWFP and Sylhet; Boundary Commission; 15 August 1947.
- Independence Act July 1947: sovereign Constituent Assemblies; Secretary of State abolished; paramountcy lapses; 1935 Act modified as interim constitution.
Towards Independence and Partition: The Last Phase (1939–1947): frequently asked questions
Is the Government of India Act, 1935 part of this chapter?
No. The 1935 Act and the 1937 elections are Class XI topics in the ISC syllabus. You need it here only to say that the dominions were governed under a modified 1935 Act until their new constitutions were ready.
How much detail on Quit India does the syllabus ask for?
A 'compact account' of the movement, its suppression and a brief analysis of its significance. Learn four points each on causes, course, suppression and significance rather than a long narrative.
Do I need the INA's campaigns in detail?
Only a brief account of its operations: the Arakan front, the Imphal-Kohima offensive of 1944, the flag at Moirang and the reasons for defeat. Focus more on its organisation under Bose and its significance.
What does 'modifications in the Indian Independence Act' mean?
It refers to how the Act changed the existing set-up: it created two dominions, made their Constituent Assemblies sovereign, abolished the Secretary of State, ended paramountcy and adapted the 1935 Act as an interim constitution.
Based on: CISCE ISC 2027 History (851) syllabus; CISCE ISC 2025 History (851) specimen question paper and answer key; CISCE Analysis of Pupil Performance, ISC History (851), 2025; CISCE Analysis of Pupil Performance, ISC History (851), 2024