Analysis of Financial Statements Class 12: Comparative and Common-size Statements
Updated 14 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Analysis of Financial Statements is a chapter of CBSE Class 12 Accountancy Part B Option I. It covers the meaning, significance, objectives and limitations of financial analysis, and its tools: comparative statements, common-size statements, ratio analysis and cash flow analysis, with the preparation of comparative and common-size statements.
What Analysis of Financial Statements is about
Financial statements give you raw figures; analysis turns them into meaning. Is the company growing? Are costs rising faster than sales? Is it relying more on borrowed money than last year? Analysis answers such questions by establishing relationships between items and comparing them over time or across firms.
The chapter first explains why we analyse: different users (management, trade payables, lenders, investors, labour unions, government) look for different things, and the objectives are to judge profitability and efficiency, the relative importance of components, the reasons for change, and the firm's ability to repay. It then lists the tools: comparative statements (horizontal analysis), common-size statements (vertical analysis), trend analysis, ratio analysis and cash flow analysis.
The numerical part of this chapter is the preparation of comparative and common-size Statements of Profit and Loss and Balance Sheets. Ratio analysis and the cash flow statement have their own chapters. The chapter ends with the limitations of financial analysis, which suit short theory answers.
Weightage: This chapter is in Part B Option I: Financial Statement Analysis, which a student takes instead of Option II (Computerised Accounting). The syllabus unit Analysis of Financial Statements carries 12 of the 80 theory marks and covers this chapter together with the chapters Financial Statements of a Company and Accounting Ratios.Source: CBSE Accountancy (055) syllabus 2026-27, Part B Option I: Financial Statement Analysis
In real board papers: asked in 2 of the 2 board papers we hold (2026 to 2026), on average 4 marks per paper. See the questions
Key concepts
- Meaning and significance of financial analysis
- NCERT section 4.1, 4.2
Analysis of financial statements is the process of identifying the financial strengths and weaknesses of a firm by properly establishing relationships between items of the Balance Sheet and the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Its significance lies in serving each user:
- Management: measures the success of operations and the efficiency of the use of resources.
- Trade payables: judge short-term liquidity.
- Lenders: judge long-term solvency, ability to pay interest and repay principal, and capital structure.
- Investors: judge present and future profitability and risk.
- Labour unions: judge whether a wage increase can be afforded.
- Government, economists and researchers: study business conditions, taxation and regulation.
Worked example
Suppose a raw-material supplier is deciding whether to sell goods on 60 days' credit to a company. What would its analysis focus on? [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The supplier is a trade payable of the company.
- It cares about payment within a short period.
Answer: Short-term liquidity: the company's ability to meet current obligations.
- Objectives of financial analysis
- NCERT section 4.3
The broad aim is to understand the information in financial statements in order to know the strengths and weaknesses of the firm and forecast its future prospects. Specifically:
- to assess current profitability and operational efficiency of the firm and its departments;
- to find the relative importance of the components of financial position;
- to identify the reasons for change in profitability or financial position;
- to judge the firm's ability to repay debt and its short- and long-term liquidity.
Worked example
Suppose a company's profit fell this year although sales rose. Which objective of analysis would a comparative statement serve here? [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- A comparative statement shows each expense's change beside the change in sales.
Answer: Identifying the reasons for the change in profitability.
- Tools of financial analysis
- NCERT section 4.4
- Comparative statements (horizontal analysis): figures of two or more periods side by side, with absolute and percentage changes. Meaningful only if the same accounting principles are used in all years.
- Common-size statements (vertical analysis): every item as a percentage of a common base (revenue from operations for the Statement of Profit and Loss; total assets or total equity and liabilities for the Balance Sheet). Useful for comparing years and firms of different sizes.
- Trend analysis: each year's figure as a percentage of a base year, showing the direction over several years.
- Ratio analysis: relationships between items to judge liquidity, solvency, activity and profitability.
- Cash flow analysis: actual inflows and outflows of cash classified into operating, investing and financing activities.
Worked example
Suppose sales were ₹4,00,000, ₹4,60,000 and ₹5,20,000 in three years, with the first year as base. Calculate trend percentages. [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Year 2: 4,60,000 ÷ 4,00,000 × 100 = 115%.
- Year 3: 5,20,000 ÷ 4,00,000 × 100 = 130%.
Answer: 100%, 115%, 130%.
- Comparative statements: how to prepare
- NCERT section 4.5
Columns: particulars, previous year, current year, absolute change (current − previous), percentage change (absolute change ÷ previous year × 100). The previous year is always the base for the percentage.
Work down the Statement of Profit and Loss line by line: total income, total expenses, profit before tax, tax and profit after tax all need their own rows. A decrease is shown in brackets or with a minus sign. Do not compute percentage change on a percentage; compute it on the rupee figures.
In the Balance Sheet version, compare each head (shareholders' funds, non-current and current liabilities, non-current and current assets) and the totals.
Worked example
Suppose revenue rose from ₹20,00,000 to ₹25,00,000. Find the absolute and percentage change. [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Absolute change = 25,00,000 − 20,00,000 = ₹5,00,000.
- Percentage change = 5,00,000 ÷ 20,00,000 × 100 = 25%.
Answer: ₹5,00,000; 25%.
- Common-size statements: how to prepare
- NCERT section 4.6
Choose the base: revenue from operations = 100 for the Statement of Profit and Loss; total of the Balance Sheet = 100 for the Balance Sheet. Each item ÷ base × 100. Columns: particulars, rupee figures for each year, percentages for each year.
Common-size statements show structure: what share of revenue goes on materials, wages or tax; what share of funds comes from owners versus lenders; how much of the assets are fixed versus current. Because everything is a percentage, two firms of very different sizes can be compared directly.
Worked example
Suppose profit after tax is ₹4,20,000 on revenue of ₹20,00,000. What is it as a common-size percentage? [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- 4,20,000 ÷ 20,00,000 × 100.
Answer: 21% of revenue from operations.
- Limitations of financial analysis
- NCERT section 4.7
- Ignores price-level changes: figures of different years are in rupees of different purchasing power.
- Affected by window dressing: statements may be made to look better than they are.
- Ignores qualitative aspects: reputation, staff quality, relations with customers.
- Suffers from the limitations of financial statements: historical cost, estimates.
- Not free from bias: the analyst's judgement affects interpretation.
- Variation in accounting practices: different firms (or years) using different methods make comparison misleading.
- Forecasting: past data may not predict the future.
Worked example
Suppose one company uses the straight-line method of depreciation and its rival uses the written-down value method. Which limitation affects a comparison of their profits? [1 mark]
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Different methods give different depreciation and therefore different profits for the same assets.
Answer: Variation in accounting practices makes inter-firm comparison less reliable.
Analysis of Financial Statements in real life
Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.
Comparative statement
Suppose a family-run sweet shop's revenue rose by 20% this Diwali season but its profit rose by only 5%.
What would a comparative statement of profit and loss help the family find?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Compare each expense's percentage change with the 20% rise in revenue.
- Any expense rising faster than 20% (sugar, ghee, wages) explains the weak profit growth.
Answer: It pinpoints which costs grew faster than revenue.
Memory hook: Side by side, the guilty cost stands out.
Common-size statement
Suppose you compare a small neighbourhood pharmacy with a large chemist chain.
Why are percentages better than rupee figures for this comparison?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The chain's rupee figures are far bigger in every line.
- Expressing items as a percentage of revenue shows which one keeps more of each rupee earned.
Answer: Common-size percentages remove the effect of size and allow a fair comparison.
Memory hook: Shrink both to 100 and compare.
Limitation: price-level changes
Suppose a school canteen's revenue doubled over ten years while prices of food roughly doubled in that time.
Has the canteen really grown?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The rupee figures doubled.
- If prices also doubled, the real volume of business is about the same.
Answer: Not really; analysis that ignores price changes overstates growth.
Memory hook: More rupees is not always more business.
Topics in this chapter
Analysis of Financial Statements: key facts
- Absolute change
- Current year figure − previous year figure
- Percentage change
- Absolute change ÷ previous year figure × 100
- Common-size % (Statement of Profit and Loss)
- Item ÷ revenue from operations × 100
- Common-size % (Balance Sheet)
- Item ÷ total assets (or total equity and liabilities) × 100
- Trend percentage
- Year's figure ÷ base year's figure × 100
How the board asks Analysis of Financial Statements
The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.
| Question type | How it is asked | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Theory | 1-mark MCQs and 3-mark answers on meaning, users, objectives, tools and limitations. | Name the user or tool and give its focus in one line. |
| Comparative statement | 3- or 4-mark preparation of a comparative Statement of Profit and Loss or Balance Sheet. | Previous year is the base; show totals and profit rows. |
| Common-size statement | 3- or 4-mark preparation with revenue or total as base. | One base per year; each line ÷ base × 100. |
| Interpretation | 1- to 3-mark questions asking what a change or a percentage means. | Compare the change in profit with the change in revenue and costs. |
Tricks to remember Analysis of Financial Statements
Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.
H for How it changed, V for Vertical slice
Horizontal = across years; Vertical = slice of one year against a base.
Use it when: Naming the tools.
Previous year is the yardstick
Change ÷ previous year × 100.
Use it when: Percentage change.
Revenue = 100, Total = 100
Revenue from operations for P&L; balance-sheet total for the Balance Sheet.
Use it when: Common-size base.
PWQ-BVF
Price changes, Window dressing, Qualitative ignored, Bias, Variation in practices, Forecasting limits.
Use it when: Limitations.
Analysis of Financial Statements: board-level solved questions
Ordered from board level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.
Example 1: Another name for comparative statements · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Comparative statements are also known as:
(a) vertical analysis
(b) horizontal analysis
(c) dynamic ratio analysis
(d) trend ratios
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Figures are compared across years side by side.
Answer: (b) horizontal analysis
Example 2: Common-size statements and firms of different size · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonBoard level
Assertion (A): Common-size statements help compare two firms of very different sizes.
Reason (R): In common-size statements all items are expressed as percentages of a common base.
(a) Both true and R explains A (b) Both true, R does not explain A (c) A true, R false (d) A false, R true
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Percentages remove the effect of size.
Answer: (a)
Example 3: Comparative Statement of Profit and Loss · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Suppose Sitara Ltd reports (2024-25 and 2025-26): revenue from operations ₹20,00,000 and ₹25,00,000; other income ₹1,00,000 and ₹80,000; cost of materials consumed ₹12,00,000 and ₹14,00,000; employee benefits ₹2,00,000 and ₹2,50,000; other expenses ₹1,00,000 and ₹1,50,000; tax 30%. Prepare a comparative Statement of Profit and Loss.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Comparative Statement of Profit and Loss of Sitara Ltd
Particulars 2024-25 (₹) 2025-26 (₹) Absolute change (₹) % change I. Revenue from operations 20,00,000 25,00,000 5,00,000 25.00% II. Other income 1,00,000 80,000 (20,000) -20.00% III. Total income (I + II) 21,00,000 25,80,000 4,80,000 22.86% IV. Expenses: cost of materials consumed 12,00,000 14,00,000 2,00,000 16.67% Employee benefits expense 2,00,000 2,50,000 50,000 25.00% Other expenses 1,00,000 1,50,000 50,000 50.00% Total expenses 15,00,000 18,00,000 3,00,000 20.00% V. Profit before tax (III − IV) 6,00,000 7,80,000 1,80,000 30.00% VI. Tax @ 30% 1,80,000 2,34,000 54,000 30.00% VII. Profit after tax (V − VI) 4,20,000 5,46,000 1,26,000 30.00%
Answer: Profit after tax rose from ₹4,20,000 to ₹5,46,000 (30%), faster than revenue (25%).
Example 4: Common-size Statement of Profit and Loss · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Using the Sitara Ltd data above, prepare a common-size Statement of Profit and Loss and comment on one change.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Common-size Statement of Profit and Loss of Sitara Ltd (base: revenue from operations)
Particulars 2024-25 (₹) 2025-26 (₹) 2024-25 (%) 2025-26 (%) I. Revenue from operations 20,00,000 25,00,000 100.00% 100.00% II. Other income 1,00,000 80,000 5.00% 3.20% III. Total income (I + II) 21,00,000 25,80,000 105.00% 103.20% IV. Expenses: cost of materials consumed 12,00,000 14,00,000 60.00% 56.00% Employee benefits expense 2,00,000 2,50,000 10.00% 10.00% Other expenses 1,00,000 1,50,000 5.00% 6.00% Total expenses 15,00,000 18,00,000 75.00% 72.00% V. Profit before tax (III − IV) 6,00,000 7,80,000 30.00% 31.20% VI. Tax @ 30% 1,80,000 2,34,000 9.00% 9.36% VII. Profit after tax (V − VI) 4,20,000 5,46,000 21.00% 21.84% - Materials fell from 60% to 56% of revenue, while other expenses rose from 5% to 6%; overall, profit after tax rose from 21% to 21.84% of revenue.
Answer: Profit after tax 21.00% and 21.84% of revenue; the improvement comes mainly from lower material cost per rupee of revenue.
Example 5: Comparative Balance Sheet · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Suppose Sitara Ltd's Balance Sheet on 31st March 2025 and 2026 shows: share capital ₹10,00,000 and ₹12,00,000; reserves and surplus ₹2,00,000 and ₹3,00,000; long-term borrowings ₹4,00,000 and ₹3,00,000; current liabilities ₹4,00,000 and ₹6,00,000; tangible fixed assets ₹12,00,000 and ₹15,00,000; non-current investments ₹2,00,000 and ₹1,00,000; current assets ₹6,00,000 and ₹8,00,000. Prepare a comparative Balance Sheet.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Comparative Balance Sheet of Sitara Ltd as at 31st March
Particulars 2025 (₹) 2026 (₹) Absolute change (₹) % change I. Equity and Liabilities Shareholders' funds: share capital 10,00,000 12,00,000 2,00,000 20.00% Reserves and surplus 2,00,000 3,00,000 1,00,000 50.00% Non-current liabilities: long-term borrowings 4,00,000 3,00,000 (1,00,000) -25.00% Current liabilities 4,00,000 6,00,000 2,00,000 50.00% Total 20,00,000 24,00,000 4,00,000 20.00% II. Assets Non-current assets: fixed assets (tangible) 12,00,000 15,00,000 3,00,000 25.00% Non-current investments 2,00,000 1,00,000 (1,00,000) -50.00% Current assets 6,00,000 8,00,000 2,00,000 33.33% Total 20,00,000 24,00,000 4,00,000 20.00%
Answer: Total rose by ₹4,00,000 (20%); long-term borrowings fell by 25% while current liabilities rose by 50%.
Example 6: Common-size Balance Sheet and interpretation · 6 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency
Using the Sitara Ltd Balance Sheet above, prepare a common-size Balance Sheet. Then comment on (i) how the company financed its growth, and (ii) any concern for short-term liquidity.
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Common-size Balance Sheet of Sitara Ltd as at 31st March (base: total)
Particulars 2025 (₹) 2026 (₹) 2025 (%) 2026 (%) I. Equity and Liabilities Shareholders' funds: share capital 10,00,000 12,00,000 50.00% 50.00% Reserves and surplus 2,00,000 3,00,000 10.00% 12.50% Non-current liabilities: long-term borrowings 4,00,000 3,00,000 20.00% 12.50% Current liabilities 4,00,000 6,00,000 20.00% 25.00% Total 20,00,000 24,00,000 100.00% 100.00% II. Assets Non-current assets: fixed assets (tangible) 12,00,000 15,00,000 60.00% 62.50% Non-current investments 2,00,000 1,00,000 10.00% 4.17% Current assets 6,00,000 8,00,000 30.00% 33.33% Total 20,00,000 24,00,000 100.00% 100.00% - (i) Owners' funds rose from 60% to 62.50% of the total and long-term debt fell from 20% to 12.50%: growth was financed by fresh share capital, retained profit and short-term credit rather than long-term debt.
- (ii) Current liabilities rose from 20% to 25% of the total while current assets rose from 30% to 33.33%; the cushion of current assets over current liabilities narrowed from 10 to 8.33 percentage points, a mild warning for liquidity.
Answer: Greater reliance on owners' funds and short-term credit; liquidity cushion narrowed slightly.
Example 7: Spotting the right base · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Suppose a student prepares a common-size Statement of Profit and Loss using total income (revenue + other income) as the base, and a classmate uses revenue from operations. Which is the accepted base, and how would the student's percentages for profit after tax differ for Sitara Ltd in 2025-26?
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- The accepted base is revenue from operations.
- With revenue: 5,46,000 ÷ 25,00,000 = 21.84%.
- With total income: 5,46,000 ÷ 25,80,000 = 21.16%, slightly lower because the base is bigger.
Answer: Revenue from operations is the base; using total income understates every percentage slightly.
Example 8: Limitation in a nutshell · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Which of these is a limitation of financial analysis?
(a) It helps compare firms of different sizes
(b) It ignores price-level changes
(c) It identifies reasons for change in profit
(d) It assesses liquidity
Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
- Only (b) is a weakness; the rest are uses.
Answer: (b)
Case-study practice (Section E style)
Read the situation, then answer every part. In the board paper this is a 4-mark question split into 1 + 1 + 2 marks.
Two bakeries, one comparison
Suppose Bake Box Ltd has revenue of ₹50 lakh and profit after tax of ₹5 lakh, while Crust Ltd has revenue of ₹2 crore and profit after tax of ₹14 lakh. Bake Box spends ₹30 lakh on materials; Crust spends ₹1.3 crore.
(i) · 1 mark
Which tool lets you compare the two firms fairly?
Answer
Answer: Common-size statements (vertical analysis).
Percentages remove the effect of size.
(ii) · 1 mark
Which firm has the higher profit after tax as a percentage of revenue?
Answer
Answer: Bake Box: 10% against Crust's 7%.
5 ÷ 50 = 10%; 14 ÷ 200 = 7%.
(iii) · 2 marks
Compare materials as a percentage of revenue and explain the link to the answer above.
Answer
Answer: Bake Box 60%; Crust 65%.
30 ÷ 50 = 60%; 130 ÷ 200 = 65%. Crust spends 5 percentage points more on materials, which helps explain its lower profit margin.
Where the marks are
How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.
Three limitations of financial analysis. (3 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| One mark for each limitation with a line of explanation | 3 |
Comparative Statement of Profit and Loss (Sitara Ltd). (4 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Total income and total expenses rows with changes | 1.5 |
| Profit before tax and tax rows | 1 |
| Profit after tax with absolute and percentage change | 1.5 |
Common-size Balance Sheet with interpretation. (6 marks)
| Step | Marks |
|---|---|
| Correct base (total) for each year | 1 |
| Percentages for equity and liabilities | 1.5 |
| Percentages for assets | 1.5 |
| Two correct comments | 2 |
Where students lose marks in Analysis of Financial Statements
The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.
Mistake: Using the current year as base for percentage change
Dividing by the bigger number.
Wrong working
5,00,000 ÷ 25,00,000 = 20%
Right working
5,00,000 ÷ 20,00,000 = 25%
Do this: Percentage change is always on the previous year.
Usually costs: 1-2 marks.
Mistake: Using total income as the common-size base
It looks like the "total".
Do this: Revenue from operations = 100 for the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Usually costs: 1-2 marks.
Mistake: Adding percentages of different items to get a percentage change
Mixing common-size and comparative ideas.
Do this: Compute each percentage from the rupee figures.
Usually costs: 1 mark.
Mistake: Leaving out total and profit rows
Copying only the given items.
Do this: Show total income, total expenses, profit before tax, tax and profit after tax.
Usually costs: 1-2 marks.
Mistake: Calling common-size analysis horizontal
Mixing the names.
Do this: Horizontal = across years (comparative); vertical = within a year (common-size).
Usually costs: 1 mark.
NCERT exercise guide: Analysis of Financial Statements
What each exercise in the NCERT chapter tests, how to approach it, and a question of the same kind solved step by step. Questions here are written in our own words.
Short and long answer questions
What it tests: Meaning, significance to different users, objectives, tools, limitations.
How to approach it: User-wise or tool-wise points with one line each.
Same kind as NCERT theory questions
Distinguish between horizontal and vertical analysis.
Show the solutionSolution
- Horizontal (comparative): compares the same item across periods.
- Vertical (common-size): compares each item with a base in the same period.
Answer: Horizontal is across years; vertical is within a year against a common base.
Comparative statements
What it tests: Comparative Statement of Profit and Loss and comparative Balance Sheet.
How to approach it: Absolute and percentage change with the previous year as base.
Same kind as NCERT comparative exercises
Suppose current liabilities rose from ₹4,00,000 to ₹6,00,000. Find the change.
Show the solutionSolution
- Absolute: ₹2,00,000.
- Percentage: 2,00,000 ÷ 4,00,000 × 100 = 50%.
Answer: ₹2,00,000; 50%
Common-size statements
What it tests: Common-size Statement of Profit and Loss and Balance Sheet.
How to approach it: Choose the base, then divide every item by it.
Same kind as NCERT common-size exercises
Suppose fixed assets are ₹15,00,000 out of total assets of ₹24,00,000. Find the common-size percentage.
Show the solutionSolution
- 15,00,000 ÷ 24,00,000 × 100.
Answer: 62.50%
Analysis of Financial Statements: previous year questions
- Asked in 2 of the 2 board papers we hold (2026 to 2026), on average 4 marks per paper; 4 questions in all, counting OR alternatives. In 4 of 4 sample papers.
Counted from the real papers on our previous year papers page, not estimated. Average marks are over every board paper we hold, with an OR pair counted once. Chapter tags are ours.
Solved board questions from Analysis of Financial Statements
Real questions from recent papers. Try each one first, then open our step-by-step solution with marks per step.
2026, set 67/1/1, Q27(a) · 1 mark · MCQ
The process of identifying the financial strengths and weaknesses of the firm by properly establishing relationships between the various items of Balance Sheet and the Statement of Profit and Loss is called :
- (A)Comparative Statement Analysis
- (B)Cash Flow Analysis
- (C)Financial Analysis
- (D)Common Size Analysis
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
Financial analysis means studying the relationships among items of the Balance Sheet and the Statement of Profit and Loss to judge the firm's financial strengths and weaknesses.
- 1 mark
Comparative, common size and cash flow analysis are only tools of it. Option (C).
Answer: (C) Financial Analysis
Where the marks are
- Financial analysis (1 mark)
2026, set 67/1/1, Q32 · 3 marks · Short answer
From the following Balance sheets of Royal Sugar Mills Ltd. as at 31st March, 2024 and 2025, prepare a Comparative Balance Sheet :
| Particulars | Note No. | 31-3-2025 (₹) | 31-3-2024 (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Equity and Liabilities : | |||
| 1. Shareholders' Funds: Share Capital | 24,00,000 | 20,00,000 | |
| 2. Non-current Liabilities: Long term borrowings | 12,00,000 | 10,00,000 | |
| 3. Current liabilities: Trade Payables | 6,00,000 | 5,00,000 | |
| Total | 42,00,000 | 35,00,000 | |
| II. Assets : | |||
| 1. Non-Current Assets: Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | 30,00,000 | 25,00,000 | |
| 2. Current Assets: (a) Inventories | 2,00,000 | 4,00,000 | |
| (b) Cash & Cash equivalents | 10,00,000 | 6,00,000 | |
| Total | 42,00,000 | 35,00,000 |
Try it first, then show our solutionSolution
- 1½ marks
Comparative Balance Sheet of Royal Sugar Mills Ltd. as at 31st March, 2024 and 2025
Particulars 31.3.2024 (₹) 31.3.2025 (₹) Absolute change (₹) % change I. Equity and Liabilities Shareholders' Funds: Share Capital 20,00,000 24,00,000 4,00,000 20 Non-current Liabilities: Long-term borrowings 10,00,000 12,00,000 2,00,000 20 Current Liabilities: Trade Payables 5,00,000 6,00,000 1,00,000 20 Total 35,00,000 42,00,000 7,00,000 20 - 1½ marks
Particulars 31.3.2024 (₹) 31.3.2025 (₹) Absolute change (₹) % change II. Assets Non-current Assets: Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 25,00,000 30,00,000 5,00,000 20 Current Assets: Inventories 4,00,000 2,00,000 (2,00,000) (50) Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents 6,00,000 10,00,000 4,00,000 66.67 Total 35,00,000 42,00,000 7,00,000 20
Answer: Every liability item and the total rise 20%; PPE +20%, inventories −50%, cash +66.67%; totals ₹ 35,00,000 → ₹ 42,00,000
Where the marks are
- Liabilities side with changes (1½ marks)
- Assets side with changes (1½ marks)
Every Analysis of Financial Statements question, by year
- For 2027
Sample paper 2026-27: Q31(A) (3 marks), Q31(B) (3 marks, solved)
- 2026
Set 67/1/1: Q27(a) (1 mark, solved), Q32 (3 marks, solved)
Set 67/5/1: Q27(b) (1 mark, solved), Q31 (3 marks, solved)
Sample paper 2025-26: Q31(a) (3 marks, solved), Q31(b) (3 marks, solved)
- For 2025
Sample paper 2024-25: Q27(a) (1 mark, solved), Q32 (3 marks, solved)
- For 2024
Sample paper 2023-24: Q27(a) (1 mark, solved), Q33(a) (4 marks, solved), Q33(b) (4 marks)
Practice questions on Analysis of Financial Statements
Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.
Q1 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
Common-size statements are also known as:
(a) horizontal analysis
(b) vertical analysis
(c) trend analysis
(d) cash flow analysisHint
Within one year.
Answer
(b) vertical analysis
Q2 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level
In a common-size Statement of Profit and Loss, the base is:
(a) total expenses
(b) profit before tax
(c) revenue from operations
(d) total incomeHint
100%.
Answer
(c) revenue from operations
Q3 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
State any three objectives of analysis of financial statements.
Hint
Profitability, components, reasons, repayment.
Answer
To assess profitability and efficiency; to find the relative importance of components of financial position; to identify reasons for change; to judge the ability to repay debt (any three).
Q4 · 3 marks · Short answerBoard level
Explain any three limitations of financial analysis.
Hint
Price changes, window dressing, qualitative aspects.
Answer
Ignores price-level changes; affected by window dressing; ignores qualitative aspects (also bias, variation in practices).
Q5 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Suppose revenue from operations is ₹8,00,000 and ₹10,00,000, cost of materials ₹4,80,000 and ₹5,50,000, and other expenses ₹1,20,000 and ₹1,50,000, with tax at 25%. Prepare a comparative Statement of Profit and Loss.
Hint
Profit before tax is ₹2,00,000 and ₹3,00,000.
Answer
Revenue +2,00,000 (25%); materials +70,000 (14.58%); other expenses +30,000 (25%); total expenses 6,00,000 → 7,00,000, +1,00,000 (16.67%); PBT 2,00,000 → 3,00,000, +1,00,000 (50%); tax 50,000 → 75,000 (50%); PAT 1,50,000 → 2,25,000, +75,000 (50%).
Q6 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Suppose total assets are ₹30,00,000, of which current assets are ₹9,00,000, and shareholders' funds are ₹18,00,000. Calculate common-size percentages for current assets, non-current assets and shareholders' funds.
Hint
Base = ₹30,00,000.
Answer
Current assets 30%; non-current assets 70%; shareholders' funds 60%.
Q7 · 3 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency
Suppose profit after tax rose by 30% while revenue rose by 25%. What does a comparative statement suggest, and which line items would you check first?
Hint
Costs grew slower than revenue.
Answer
Costs grew more slowly than revenue (operating leverage or better cost control). Check the main cost lines first (cost of materials, employee benefits, other expenses) to see which grew by less than 25%, and whether other income or tax changed.
Q8 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHOTS / competency
Assertion (A): Comparative statements are meaningful only when the same accounting principles are followed in all the years compared.
Reason (R): A change in method can change figures without any real change in performance.
(a) Both true and R explains A (b) Both true, R does not explain A (c) A true, R false (d) A false, R trueHint
Like with like.
Answer
(a)
Q9 · 3 marks · Short answerHarder board level
Suppose sales for 2023-24, 2024-25 and 2025-26 are ₹5,00,000, ₹6,00,000 and ₹5,50,000. Calculate trend percentages with 2023-24 as base and interpret.
Hint
Base = 100.
Answer
100%, 120%, 110%: sales grew 20% and then fell back by 10 points; the trend is upward but uneven.
Q10 · 1 mark · MCQHarder board level
Current liabilities of a company were ₹4,00,000 in 2025 and ₹6,00,000 in 2026. The percentage change is:
(a) 33.33%
(b) 50%
(c) 66.67%
(d) 150%Hint
Previous year is the base.
Answer
(b) 50%
Test your recall
Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.
1.What is the base for a common-size Balance Sheet?Show answer
Total assets (or total equity and liabilities) = 100.
2.What does a comparative statement show?Show answer
Figures of two or more periods with absolute and percentage changes.
3.What is trend analysis?Show answer
Each year's figure as a percentage of a base year, over several years.
4.Which users are most interested in short-term liquidity?Show answer
Trade payables.
5.Name the five tools of analysis.Show answer
Comparative statements, common-size statements, trend analysis, ratio analysis and cash flow analysis.
6.Why must accounting principles be consistent for comparative statements?Show answer
Otherwise changes may come from a change in method, not performance.
7.Name three limitations of financial analysis.Show answer
Ignores price changes, window dressing, ignores qualitative aspects.
8.What is the base for percentage change?Show answer
The previous year's figure.
Best order to study it
- Learn the meaning, users and objectives of analysis.
- Learn the five tools in one line each.
- Practise comparative Statements of Profit and Loss and Balance Sheets.
- Practise common-size statements with the correct base.
- Interpret changes and percentages in two or three sentences.
- Learn the limitations.
Quick revision checklist
The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?
- Can you define analysis of financial statements?
- Can you say what each user looks for?
- Can you state four objectives?
- Can you name and explain the tools?
- Can you compute absolute and percentage changes correctly?
- Can you choose the common-size base for each statement?
- Can you prepare a comparative Balance Sheet?
- Can you interpret a common-size Balance Sheet?
- Can you compute trend percentages?
- Can you list six limitations?
Analysis of Financial Statements: frequently asked questions
Is trend analysis asked in the 2026-27 syllabus?
The syllabus names comparative statements, common-size statements, ratio analysis and cash flow analysis as tools; NCERT also explains trend analysis briefly. Expect it mainly as a concept.
How many decimal places should I give?
Two decimal places for percentages is the usual practice.
Do I show tax in a comparative statement?
Yes, if the tax rate is given: show profit before tax, tax and profit after tax rows.
Is this chapter for Option II students?
No. It belongs to Part B Option I (Analysis of Financial Statements).
What is the difference between ratio analysis and common-size analysis?
A ratio links two chosen items (such as current assets and current liabilities); a common-size statement expresses every item against one common base.
Based on: CBSE Accountancy (055) syllabus 2026-27; NCERT Accountancy Part II (Company Accounts and Analysis of Financial Statements), Textbook for Class XII (Reprint 2026-27)