Skip to content
Political ScienceISC Class 11 · Chapter 2

The Origin of the State: Divine Origin Theory and the Social Contract (Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau), ISC Class 11

Updated 15 October 2026 · Fact-checked

The divine origin theory says God created the state and the king rules as God's representative, answerable only to God. The social contract theory says people created the state by agreement to escape a state of nature: Hobbes's absolute sovereign, Locke's limited government protecting life, liberty and property, and Rousseau's sovereign General Will.

What The Origin of the State is about

How did the state come into existence? The syllabus asks for the features of two theories.

1. Divine origin theory (features only): the state is created by God; the ruler is God's agent; he is accountable only to God; obedience is a religious duty; rule is usually hereditary. It was used to support the 'divine right of kings' in Europe.

2. Social contract theory (features only), as given by three thinkers:

  • Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan, 1651): a selfish, fearful human nature; a state of nature that was a war of all against all; a contract by which people surrender all their rights to an absolute sovereign.
  • John Locke (Two Treatises of Government, 1690): a rational, social human nature; a state of nature governed by natural law but with 'inconveniences'; a contract that creates a limited government to protect life, liberty and property, with a right to resist.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract, 1762): a free and happy natural man spoiled by property and inequality; a contract by which each gives himself to the community, whose General Will is sovereign.

The skill is to compare the three thinkers on the same points: human nature, state of nature, terms of the contract, nature of sovereignty and the kind of government each supports.

Weightage: CISCE gives no Class XI unit weightage for ISC Political Science. The Origin of the State is topic 2 of the Class XI syllabus (Political Theory) and can be asked anywhere in the 80-mark Paper I (Theory, 3 hours). Class XI is examined by the school, so your school sets the paper and decides how many marks each topic carries.Source: CISCE ISC Political Science (852) syllabus, examination year 2028, Class XI

Key concepts

Divine origin theory: features

The divine origin theory is the oldest explanation of the state.

Features
1. The state is created by God, not by human beings; it is part of a divine plan.
2. The ruler is God's representative or agent on earth (in some traditions, himself divine).
3. The ruler is responsible only to God, not to the people; his power is unlimited by any earthly authority.
4. Obedience to the ruler is a religious duty; disobedience or rebellion is a sin against God.
5. Kingship is usually hereditary: the right to rule passes by birth within a royal family chosen by God.
6. A bad ruler is punished by God, not removed by subjects.

Examples: Egyptian pharaohs were regarded as gods; Chinese emperors claimed the 'Mandate of Heaven'; Japanese emperors claimed descent from the sun goddess. In early modern Europe, King James I of England and the French bishop Bossuet argued for the 'divine right of kings'.

Decline: the theory was undermined by the separation of church and state, the rise of democracy and the idea that authority comes from the consent of the people. It remains important for showing the early link between religion and politics and the value of obedience and order.

Worked example

[4] State four features of the divine origin theory of the state. (Recall)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. The state is created by God - 1 mark.
  2. The ruler is God's representative - 1 mark.
  3. The ruler is accountable only to God; his power is unlimited - 1 mark.
  4. Obedience is a religious duty; rebellion a sin; kingship hereditary - 1 mark.

Answer: According to the divine origin theory the state is created by God, and the ruler is God's representative on earth; the ruler is accountable only to God, so his power is not limited by the people; and obedience to him is a religious duty, rebellion being a sin, with the right to rule usually passing by inheritance.

Social contract theory: common features

1. State of nature: before the state there was a 'state of nature' in which people lived without government, law or political authority.
2. Natural law and natural rights: in that condition people were governed only by natural law (reason or instinct) and had certain natural rights.
3. Problems of the state of nature: for different reasons (fear, insecurity, inconvenience or inequality) the state of nature became unsatisfactory.
4. Contract: people agreed among themselves to give up some or all of their natural rights and create a political society and government.
5. Human creation: the state is therefore an artificial creation of human beings, not of God or of nature.
6. Consent: the authority of the state rests on the consent of the people.

The theory is linked with Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, who agreed on this framework but disagreed on human nature, the state of nature and the kind of state that results.

Criticisms (useful for evaluation): there is no historical evidence of a state of nature or of such a contract; a contract cannot bind later generations who never agreed to it; and rights cannot exist before an organised society that recognises them. Its lasting value is the idea that legitimate government rests on consent.

Worked example

[4] State the common features of the social contract theory of the origin of the state. (Recall)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. A pre-political state of nature without government - 1 mark.
  2. People governed by natural law with natural rights - 1 mark.
  3. A contract to give up rights and create the state - 1 mark.
  4. The state is a human creation based on consent - 1 mark.

Answer: Social contract theorists hold that before the state people lived in a state of nature without government, governed only by natural law and enjoying natural rights; that this condition became unsatisfactory, so people made a contract giving up some or all of their rights to create political society; and that the state is therefore a human creation whose authority rests on consent.

Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), an English thinker, wrote Leviathan (1651), during and after the English Civil War.

1. Human nature: selfish, competitive and driven by fear of death and desire for power.
2. State of nature: a condition of 'war of every man against every man', with no industry, culture or security; life was 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short'. There was no idea of right or wrong, just or unjust.
3. Reason for the contract: fear of violent death and the desire for self-preservation.
4. The contract: each person agreed with every other to surrender all natural rights to a sovereign (one person or an assembly), except the right to preserve one's life. The sovereign was not a party to the contract and so was bound by no conditions.
5. Sovereignty: absolute, unlimited, indivisible and permanent. The sovereign's command is law.
6. No right of rebellion: people may not resist the sovereign, because without him they would fall back into the state of nature. Only if the sovereign threatens a subject's life may the subject resist.
7. Government supported: absolute monarchy (though an assembly could be sovereign).

Worked example

[4] Explain Hobbes's view of human nature and the state of nature, and its result for the kind of state he supported. (Understanding)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Human nature selfish, competitive, fearful - 1 mark.
  2. State of nature: war of all against all; life 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short' - 1 mark.
  3. Contract: all rights surrendered to a sovereign not party to the contract - 1 mark.
  4. Absolute sovereign; no right of rebellion; supports absolute monarchy - 1 mark.

Answer: Hobbes thought human beings were selfish, competitive and driven by fear, so the state of nature was a war of every man against every man in which life was 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short'. To escape it, people surrendered all their rights to a sovereign who was not a party to the contract. That sovereign was absolute and could not be lawfully resisted, so Hobbes supported absolute monarchy.

John Locke

John Locke (1632-1704), an English thinker, wrote Two Treatises of Government (1690), which defended the Glorious Revolution of 1688.

1. Human nature: rational, social and peace-loving.
2. State of nature: a state of peace, goodwill and mutual help, governed by natural law (reason). People had natural rights to life, liberty and property.
3. Inconveniences: there was no established, known law; no impartial judge to settle disputes; and no power to enforce just decisions. Each person was judge in his own case.
4. The contract: people agreed to form a civil society and set up a government. They gave up only the right to interpret and enforce natural law, not their natural rights.
5. Government as a trust: government exists to protect life, liberty and property; its power is limited by the purpose for which it was created.
6. Right to resist: if the government violates natural rights or betrays the trust, the people may resist and replace it.
7. Sovereignty: ultimately with the people; the legislature is the supreme organ of government but acts within limits. Government supported: limited, constitutional government based on consent, with majority rule.

Worked example

[4] State the main features of Locke's social contract theory. (Recall)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Human nature rational and social; state of nature peaceful under natural law - 1 mark.
  2. Natural rights to life, liberty and property; inconveniences of no law, judge, enforcement - 1 mark.
  3. Contract surrenders only the right to enforce natural law; government a trust - 1 mark.
  4. Limited government; people can resist and replace it - 1 mark.

Answer: Locke saw human beings as rational and social, living in a peaceful state of nature under natural law, with rights to life, liberty and property. Because there was no known law, impartial judge or enforcing power, they made a contract giving up only the right to enforce natural law. Government holds power as a trust to protect these rights, its power is limited, and if it violates them the people may resist and replace it.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), born in Geneva, wrote The Social Contract (1762), which begins: 'Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.'

1. Human nature: naturally good, simple and free (later writers called this the 'noble savage', a phrase Rousseau did not use).
2. State of nature: at first an idyllic condition of freedom, equality and contentment, with few needs.
3. Decline: the growth of population, the discovery of agriculture and metals and especially private property created inequality, competition and conflict.
4. The contract: each individual surrendered all his rights not to a ruler but to the whole community. In return, each received the protection of the community and became an equal member of the sovereign body.
5. General Will: the sovereign is the General Will, the will of the community directed to the common good (as distinct from the 'will of all', a mere sum of private interests). By obeying the General Will, a person obeys his own real will and remains free.
6. Sovereignty: belongs to the people (popular sovereignty); it is absolute, inalienable, indivisible and cannot be represented.
7. Government supported: direct democracy, in which the people themselves make the laws; government is only an agent of the sovereign people.

Influence: his ideas of popular sovereignty and equality inspired the French Revolution.

Worked example

[4] Explain Rousseau's concept of the General Will and its importance in his theory. (Understanding)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Each surrenders all rights to the community, not to a ruler - 1 mark.
  2. General Will: will of the community aimed at the common good - 1 mark.
  3. Different from the 'will of all' (sum of private interests) - 1 mark.
  4. General Will is sovereign: popular sovereignty, direct democracy - 1 mark.

Answer: In Rousseau's contract each person surrenders all rights to the community as a whole, not to a ruler. The community's General Will is its will directed to the common good, unlike the 'will of all', which is merely the sum of private interests. The General Will is sovereign, so sovereignty belongs to the people, and Rousseau supported direct democracy in which the people make the laws.

The Origin of the State in real life

Each concept, met in an everyday situation. Read the situation, answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.

Why people accept rules

Suppose a new housing colony has no rules, no guards and no committee. After a few months of quarrels over parking and noise, residents agree to elect a committee and obey its decisions.

Which theory of the state's origin does this illustrate?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Life without rules resembles the state of nature.
  2. Residents agree to give up some freedom for order.
  3. Authority rests on their consent: the social contract.

Answer: It illustrates the social contract theory: people facing the problems of a 'state of nature' agree to create an authority and obey it, so its power rests on their consent.

Memory hook: Order by agreement, not by birth.

Absolute versus limited authority

Imagine two clubs. In one, members hand total control to a captain whom no one may question. In the other, the captain is chosen to protect members' rights and can be replaced if he abuses them.

Which thinkers' views do the two clubs represent?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. The first resembles Hobbes's absolute sovereign.
  2. The second resembles Locke's government as a trust.
  3. Locke allows resistance; Hobbes does not.

Answer: The first club follows Hobbes, with an absolute sovereign who cannot be resisted; the second follows Locke, with a limited government held as a trust that can be removed if it violates rights.

Memory hook: Hobbes hands over all; Locke lends power on trust.

General Will versus will of all

Suppose a class votes on how to spend its fund. Each student votes for what helps him personally, but the result is a plan that helps no one. Another time, students ask what will help the class as a whole.

Which Rousseau idea does the contrast illustrate?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Adding up private interests is the 'will of all'.
  2. Asking what is good for all is the General Will.
  3. Rousseau said the General Will, not the will of all, is sovereign.

Answer: It illustrates Rousseau's distinction between the will of all (a sum of private interests) and the General Will (the will directed to the common good), which he held to be sovereign.

Memory hook: Sum of wishes is not the common good.

Topics in this chapter

The Origin of the State: key facts

Divine origin theory
God creates state; king God's agent; answerable to God only
Divine right of kings: James I, Bossuet.
Hobbes
Leviathan (1651); life 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short'
Absolute sovereign; no right to rebel.
Locke
Two Treatises of Government (1690); life, liberty, property
Limited government; right to resist.
Rousseau
The Social Contract (1762); 'Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains'
General Will; popular sovereignty.
Common frame
State of nature -> contract -> civil society and state
Authority rests on consent.
Governments supported
Hobbes: absolute monarchy; Locke: constitutional government; Rousseau: direct democracy
Compare on the same points.

How the school exam asks The Origin of the State

The question patterns to expect, and the method that works for each.

Question typeHow it is askedMethod
One-mark recallAuthor of Leviathan; Locke's three natural rights; meaning of General Will.Learn book, year and one key phrase for each thinker.
Four-mark featuresFeatures of the divine origin theory; Hobbes's, Locke's or Rousseau's version of the contract.Use the same five headings: human nature, state of nature, contract, sovereignty, government.
Eight-mark comparisonCompare Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau; or contrast the divine theory with the social contract theory.A table-like answer with point-by-point comparison.

Tricks to remember The Origin of the State

Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.

  • Human nature: 'Bad - Good-ish - Good'

    Hobbes: selfish; Locke: rational and social; Rousseau: naturally good.

    Use it when: First point of any comparison.

  • Sovereign: 'King - Parliament (people) - People'

    Hobbes: absolute sovereign; Locke: limited government, people ultimately; Rousseau: General Will.

    Use it when: Where sovereignty lies.

  • Locke's rights: 'L-L-P'

    Life, Liberty, Property.

    Use it when: Natural rights.

The Origin of the State: exam-level solved questions

Ordered from exam level to HOTS. Cover the solution, write your own, then compare step by step.

Example 1: Author of Leviathan · 1 mark · MCQExam level

Who described life in the state of nature as 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short'?
(a) John Locke
(b) Jean-Jacques Rousseau
(c) Thomas Hobbes
(d) James I

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Locke's state of nature was peaceful; Rousseau's was happy.
  2. Hobbes wrote this in Leviathan (1651).

Answer: (c) Thomas Hobbes.

Example 2: Assertion-reason: Locke and revolution · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder exam level

Assertion (A): Locke allowed the people to resist and replace a government.
Reason (R): For Locke, government holds power as a trust to protect natural rights.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Locke defended the right of resistance.
  2. A government that betrays its trust loses its right to rule, so R explains A.

Answer: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.

Example 3: Divine versus contract · 4 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

[4] Distinguish between the divine origin theory and the social contract theory. (Analysis)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Divine: state created by God; contract: created by people.
  2. Divine: ruler answerable to God; contract: authority rests on consent.
  3. Divine: obedience a religious duty; contract: obedience by agreement.
  4. Divine supports hereditary absolute monarchy; contract can support absolute, limited or democratic government.

Answer: The divine theory holds that God created the state, while the contract theory says people created it by agreement. Under the divine theory the ruler answers only to God; under the contract theory authority rests on the consent of the people. Obedience is a religious duty in one and a matter of agreement in the other, and while the divine theory supports hereditary absolute monarchy, contract theories have supported absolute monarchy (Hobbes), limited government (Locke) and direct democracy (Rousseau).

Example 4: Why Hobbes and Locke differ · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

[4] Why did Hobbes and Locke reach opposite conclusions about the power of government? (Analysis)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Different human nature: selfish and fearful versus rational and social.
  2. Different state of nature: war versus peace with inconveniences.
  3. Different contract: all rights surrendered versus only the right to enforce natural law.
  4. Context: Hobbes wrote amid civil war (order first); Locke defended the 1688 revolution (rights first).

Answer: Hobbes thought people were selfish and fearful, so the state of nature was a war that only an absolute sovereign could end; Locke thought people were rational and social, so the state of nature was peaceful but inconvenient, and they needed only a limited government. Hobbes's people surrendered all rights; Locke's surrendered only the right to enforce natural law. Their contexts mattered too: Hobbes wrote amid civil war and valued order, Locke defended the revolution of 1688 and valued rights.

Example 5: Comparing the three · 8 marks · Long answerHarder exam level

[8] Compare the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. (Analysis)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Human nature: selfish / rational / naturally good (1).
  2. State of nature: war / peace with inconveniences / idyllic then corrupted by property (1).
  3. Reason for contract: fear / insecurity of rights / inequality (1).
  4. Terms: all rights to sovereign / right to enforce law only / all rights to community (1).
  5. Sovereignty: absolute ruler / people with limited government / General Will (1).
  6. Right of resistance: none / yes / sovereign people make laws (1).
  7. Government: absolute monarchy / constitutional / direct democracy (1).
  8. Common: state is a human creation based on consent (1).

Answer: Hobbes saw human nature as selfish, Locke as rational and social, and Rousseau as naturally good. Hobbes's state of nature was a war of all against all, Locke's peaceful but inconvenient, and Rousseau's happy until private property created inequality. People contracted out of fear for Hobbes, to secure their rights for Locke, and to end inequality and restore freedom for Rousseau. Hobbes's people surrendered all rights to a sovereign outside the contract; Locke's surrendered only the right to enforce natural law; Rousseau's gave all rights to the community. Sovereignty was therefore absolute and in the ruler for Hobbes, ultimately with the people under a limited government for Locke, and in the General Will for Rousseau. Hobbes denied a right of rebellion, Locke allowed it, and Rousseau made the people themselves the lawmakers. Hobbes supported absolute monarchy, Locke constitutional government and Rousseau direct democracy, but all three agreed that the state is a human creation resting on consent.

Example 6: Value of a fiction · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

[4] 'The social contract is historically false but politically valuable.' Evaluate. (Evaluate)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. No historical evidence of a state of nature or contract.
  2. A contract cannot bind later generations; rights need society.
  3. Value: authority based on consent, not birth or God.
  4. Influence: limited government (Locke) and popular sovereignty (Rousseau) shaped modern democracies.

Answer: True. There is no historical evidence of a state of nature or of people signing a contract, a contract cannot bind generations who never agreed to it, and rights presuppose an organised society. Yet the theory is valuable because it bases authority on the consent of the people rather than birth or divine will, and Locke's limited government and Rousseau's popular sovereignty shaped modern constitutional democracies.

Case-study practice (Section D style)

Read the situation, then answer every part. In a school exam set on the board pattern this is a 8-mark question split into 2 + 1 + 1 + 4 marks.

A debate in the agora (source-based)

Read the imaginary dialogue and answer.

Speaker A: 'Without a ruler with absolute power, men would tear one another apart.'
Speaker B: 'Men are reasonable. We need a government only to judge our disputes fairly and to protect our property, and if it robs us, we may remove it.'
Speaker C: 'Man was born free and happy. Property and inequality enslaved him. Only when all of us together make the laws shall we be free again.'

  1. (i) · 2 marks

    Identify the thinkers whose views are given by Speakers A, B and C.

    Answer

    Answer: A: Thomas Hobbes; B: John Locke; C: Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

    2 marks for all three; 1 for two.

  2. (ii) · 1 mark

    Name the book in which Speaker A's thinker set out his theory, with its year.

    Answer

    Answer: Leviathan (1651).

    1 mark.

  3. (iii) · 1 mark

    What natural rights does Speaker B's thinker wish government to protect?

    Answer

    Answer: Life, liberty and property.

    1 mark.

  4. (iv) · 4 marks

    Explain how Speaker C's idea of sovereignty differs from Speaker A's. Give three points.

    Answer

    Answer: (1) For Hobbes the sovereign is a ruler (one person or an assembly) outside the contract; for Rousseau it is the community's General Will. (2) Hobbes's sovereign is above the people; Rousseau's sovereignty belongs to the people themselves. (3) Hobbes supports absolute monarchy; Rousseau supports direct democracy. (4) Under Hobbes obedience is the price of security; under Rousseau obeying the General Will is obeying one's own real will, so it preserves freedom.

    1 mark each for any four points; 4 marks maximum.

Where the marks are

How a typical answer is split into step marks. Show every step: a right final answer alone rarely earns full marks.

[4] Features of Rousseau's social contract. (4 marks)

StepMarks
Naturally good man; happy state of nature.1
Corrupted by property and inequality.1
All rights surrendered to the community.1
General Will sovereign; direct democracy.1

[8] Compare Hobbes and Locke. (8 marks)

StepMarks
Human nature.1
State of nature.1
Reason for the contract.1
Terms of the contract.1
Nature of sovereignty.1
Right of resistance.1
Form of government supported.1
Context: civil war versus 1688.1

Where students lose marks in The Origin of the State

The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.

  • Mistake: Mixing up the thinkers' views of the state of nature

    The three are learnt together and blur.

    Wrong working

    Locke's state of nature was a war of all against all.

    Right working

    Hobbes: war; Locke: peace with inconveniences; Rousseau: happy until property.

    Do this: Use 'Bad - Good-ish - Good'.

    Usually costs: 1-2 marks.

  • Mistake: Writing criticisms when only features are asked

    The syllabus says 'features only'.

    Do this: Give features; add criticism only if the question asks you to evaluate.

    Usually costs: Time and marks lost.

  • Mistake: Comparisons written thinker by thinker without matching points

    Comparison questions reward point-by-point matching on the same headings.

    Do this: Compare all three on each heading.

    Usually costs: 2 marks.

  • Mistake: Calling Hobbes's sovereign a party to the contract

    A common confusion.

    Do this: The contract is among the people; the sovereign stands outside it.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Confusing General Will with majority vote

    Both seem to be 'what people want'.

    Do this: General Will aims at the common good; a majority may express only the will of all.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

Practice questions on The Origin of the State

Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.

  1. Q1 · 1 mark · Very short answerExam level

    Which theory holds that the king is responsible only to God?

    Hint

    Oldest theory.

    Answer

    The divine origin theory (divine right of kings).

  2. Q2 · 1 mark · Very short answerExam level

    Name Locke's work of 1690 on government.

    Hint

    Two parts.

    Answer

    Two Treatises of Government.

  3. Q3 · 1 mark · MCQExam level

    According to Rousseau, sovereignty lies in:
    (a) The king
    (b) The legislature
    (c) The General Will
    (d) The Church

    Hint

    Will of the community.

    Answer

    (c) The General Will.

  4. Q4 · 1 mark · Very short answerHarder exam level

    Which three 'inconveniences' of the state of nature did Locke identify?

    Hint

    Law, judge, power.

    Answer

    No established law, no impartial judge and no power to enforce decisions.

  5. Q5 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    [4] Explain why the divine origin theory declined.

    Hint

    Church, democracy, consent, science.

    Answer

    (1) Separation of church and state reduced religious authority over politics. (2) The rise of democracy put the source of authority in the people. (3) Social contract thinkers argued that power rests on consent. (4) Rational and scientific thinking questioned claims of divine appointment and made unlimited power seem dangerous.

  6. Q6 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    [4] Explain Hobbes's view of sovereignty.

    Hint

    Absolute, indivisible, no rebellion.

    Answer

    (1) The sovereign receives all the rights surrendered by the people. (2) Sovereignty is absolute, unlimited, indivisible and permanent. (3) The sovereign is not a party to the contract, so he is bound by no conditions; his command is law. (4) Subjects may not rebel, except to save their own lives.

  7. Q7 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder exam level

    [4] Distinguish between the General Will and the will of all.

    Hint

    Common good versus private interests.

    Answer

    (1) The General Will aims at the common good of the whole community. (2) The will of all is the sum of the private wills and interests of individuals. (3) The General Will is always right and is the sovereign; the will of all may be selfish and mistaken. (4) Obeying the General Will is obeying one's own real will, so it preserves freedom.

  8. Q8 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    [4] Which thinker's ideas are closest to the Indian Constitution? Justify.

    Hint

    Rights, limited government, people.

    Answer

    Locke's, largely. (1) The Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, as Locke's government protects natural rights. (2) It limits government through a written constitution and judicial review. (3) The Preamble says 'We, the people', so authority rests on consent. (4) But it is a representative, not direct, democracy (unlike Rousseau) and not absolute (unlike Hobbes).

  9. Q9 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    [4] 'Hobbes's state of nature explains why people tolerate even harsh governments.' Discuss.

    Hint

    Fear of chaos.

    Answer

    (1) Hobbes argued that life without government would be a war of all against all. (2) People fear disorder more than oppression. (3) So they may accept harsh rulers who guarantee security, as many have done after civil wars. (4) But Locke would reply that a government that violates basic rights loses its claim to obedience; history also shows people rebelling against tyranny.

  10. Q10 · 8 marks · Long answerHarder exam level

    [8] (a) State the features of the divine origin theory. [4]
    (b) State the main features of Locke's version of the social contract. [4]

    Hint

    Four each.

    Answer

    (a) (1) State created by God. (2) Ruler God's representative. (3) Ruler responsible only to God; unlimited power. (4) Obedience a religious duty; rebellion a sin; hereditary rule. (b) (1) Human nature rational and social; peaceful state of nature under natural law. (2) Natural rights to life, liberty and property; inconveniences of no law, judge or enforcement. (3) Contract surrenders only the right to enforce natural law; government a trust. (4) Limited government; people may resist and replace it.

Test your recall

Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.

  1. 1.Which English king argued for the divine right of kings?Show answer

    James I.

  2. 2.When was Leviathan published?Show answer

    1651.

  3. 3.What did Locke's people surrender in the contract?Show answer

    Only the right to interpret and enforce natural law.

  4. 4.What is the opening line of The Social Contract?Show answer

    'Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.'

  5. 5.What form of government did Rousseau favour?Show answer

    Direct democracy.

  6. 6.What did Rousseau blame for the end of the happy state of nature?Show answer

    Private property and the inequality it created.

Best order to study it

  1. Divine origin theory: features and examples.
  2. Common features of social contract theory.
  3. Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau on five headings.
  4. Comparisons and the value of the theory.

Quick revision checklist

The night before the exam: can you do each of these without looking?

  • Divine: God creates state; king God's agent; answerable to God; obedience a duty; hereditary.
  • Contract: state of nature; natural law and rights; contract; state a human creation; consent.
  • Hobbes (1651): selfish man; war of all; all rights to absolute sovereign; no rebellion; absolute monarchy.
  • Locke (1690): rational man; peaceful but inconvenient; life, liberty, property; limited trust; right to resist.
  • Rousseau (1762): good man; property corrupts; all rights to community; General Will; direct democracy.

The Origin of the State: frequently asked questions

Do I need the other theories (force, evolutionary)?

No. The syllabus names only the divine origin theory and the social contract theory of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau.

Is the state of nature a real historical period?

No. It is a hypothetical condition that the thinkers used to explain why people need a state and on what terms.

Did Locke speak of one contract or two?

He described people first agreeing to form a civil society and then setting up a government as a trust. Many textbooks call these two stages; the key point is that government's power is limited.

Based on: CISCE ISC 2028 Political Science (852) syllabus (Classes XI and XII); CISCE Regulations for the ISC Examination Year 2028 (Class XI internal examination)