Skip to content

Reorganisation of States on Linguistic Lines Class 12

questionbuddy.in/cbse/class-12/political-science/challenges-of-nation-building/reorganisation-of-states

Political ScienceCBSE Class 12 · Challenges of Nation Building

Reorganisation of States on a Linguistic Basis (Class 12 Political Science)

Updated 16 October 2026 · Fact-checked

After independence, India had to redraw state boundaries to reflect its languages without harming unity. Leaders first postponed linguistic states, fearing disintegration, but the Vishalandhra movement and Potti Sriramulu's death led to Andhra in December 1952. The States Reorganisation Commission (1953) led to the 1956 Act, creating 14 states and six union territories.

Follow the arrow: leaders first postponed linguistic states, then Andhra in 1952 and the SRC led to the 1956 Act.

Illustration drawn for QuestionBuddy.

Understand Reorganisation of States

Why this topic matters. Reorganisation of states completes the nation-building chapter. Board papers ask why leaders hesitated, why the States Reorganisation Commission was set up and on what basis states were formed, and how linguistic states affected democracy. NCERT section: 'Reorganisation of States', with the Potti Sriramulu box and the 'Fast Forward' box on new states.

1. The task. Internal boundaries had to be drawn so that India's linguistic and cultural plurality was reflected without affecting national unity. Colonial boundaries had followed administrative convenience or the territories the British had annexed or the princes ruled.

2. Before independence. The national movement called these divisions artificial and promised the linguistic principle. After the Nagpur session of the Congress in 1920, the party itself was reorganised on linguistic lines, with Provincial Congress Committees by language zone.

3. Why leaders hesitated after 1947.

ConcernDetail
DisintegrationLanguage-based states might cause disruption and disintegration
Other prioritiesThey might divert attention from social and economic challenges
Princely statesThe fate of the princely states was not yet settled
PartitionThe memory of Partition was still fresh

So the central leadership decided to postpone the matter.

4. The Andhra breakthrough.

EventDetail
ProtestsTelugu-speaking areas of the old Madras province (which included today's Tamil Nadu and parts of Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Karnataka)
Vishalandhra movementDemand to separate Telugu areas into an Andhra province; nearly all political forces in Andhra supported it
Potti SriramuluCongress leader and veteran Gandhian; fast unto death from 19 October 1952; died on 15 December 1952 after 56 days
ReactionViolent outbursts, police firing, legislators in Madras resigned
ResultThe Prime Minister announced a separate Andhra state in December 1952

Sriramulu's background: left a government job for the Salt Satyagraha, joined the individual satyagraha, and fasted in 1946 for opening Madras temples to dalits.

5. The Commission and the Act.

  • Andhra spurred struggles elsewhere, forcing the Centre to appoint the States Reorganisation Commission in 1953.
  • Its key finding: state boundaries should reflect the boundaries of different languages.
  • The States Reorganisation Act, 1956 created 14 states and six union territories.

6. Why the leadership finally accepted linguistic states. Accepting all regions' linguistic claims was expected to reduce the threat of separatism, and accommodating regional demands was seen as more democratic.

7. What linguistic states achieved.

  • Politics and power opened to people other than the small English-speaking elite.
  • A uniform basis for drawing state boundaries.
  • It did not cause disintegration; it strengthened national unity.
  • It showed acceptance of the principle of diversity: democracy means recognising differences, sometimes opposed ones.

8. Fast forward: new states.

YearChange
1960Bilingual Bombay state split into Maharashtra and Gujarat after agitation
1963Nagaland became a state
1966Punjab reorganised; Haryana and Himachal Pradesh separated
1972Meghalaya carved out of Assam; Manipur and Tripura became states
1987Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
2000Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand: based on regional culture or imbalance in development, not language
2 June 2014Telangana

Demands continue, for example Vidarbha, Harit Pradesh (western Uttar Pradesh) and the northern region of West Bengal.

Key quotations

Short lines worth knowing by heart: who says them, when, and why they matter.

  • other than the small English speaking elite

    NCERT, Politics in India since Independence, Chapter 1: Effect of linguistic states on democratic politics.

    The strongest point on how linguistic states deepened democracy.

  • On the contrary it strengthened national unity

    NCERT, Chapter 1: Answering fears that linguistic states would cause disintegration.

    Use in conclusions.

  • it will also give a fillip to the regional languages

    Mahatma Gandhi, January 1948: On the formation of linguistic provinces.

    Shows support for the linguistic principle within the national movement.

Reorganisation of States: key facts

Why postpone
  • Fear of disintegration
  • Diversion from social and economic challenges
  • Princely states unsettled
  • Memory of Partition
Challenged by local leaders and people.
Andhra
  • Vishalandhra movement in Madras province
  • Potti Sriramulu fast from 19 Oct 1952; died 15 Dec 1952 after 56 days
  • Andhra announced December 1952
Spurred demands elsewhere.
Commission and Act
States Reorganisation Commission 1953: boundaries should follow languages | States Reorganisation Act 1956: 14 states, 6 union territories
Basis: language.
Later states
1960Maharashtra, Gujarat
1963Nagaland
1966Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh
1972Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura
1987Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh
2000Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand
2014Telangana
After 2000, culture and development, not just language.

How to answer Reorganisation of States questions

Questions ask why leaders hesitated, why the Commission was set up and what basis it chose, and whether linguistic states helped or hurt unity and democracy. Dates and the Andhra sequence carry marks.

  1. 1State the task: boundaries reflecting language without harming unity.
  2. 2Give the pre-independence promise (Nagpur 1920) and the post-1947 hesitation with reasons.
  3. 3Narrate Andhra: Vishalandhra, Sriramulu's fast and death, December 1952.
  4. 4Give the Commission (1953), its recommendation and the 1956 Act (14 states, six UTs).
  5. 5Evaluate: more democratic, wider leadership, uniform basis, stronger unity.
  6. 6Add later states if the question asks about the process after 1956.

Reorganisation of States in real life

The idea, met in an everyday situation. Answer the question in your own words, then compare with the model answer. The one-line hook is what to remember.

One concession, many demands

Suppose a school keeps postponing separate clubs for each language group. After weeks of protest by one group, it grants that group a club. Other groups immediately demand theirs, so the school appoints a committee to redraw all the clubs at once.

Which sequence in the reorganisation of states does this mirror?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Postponement mirrors the leadership's decision to delay linguistic states.
  2. The first concession mirrors the formation of Andhra in December 1952.
  3. Fresh demands and a committee mirror the struggles elsewhere and the States Reorganisation Commission of 1953, leading to the 1956 Act.

Answer: It mirrors the path from Andhra (1952) to the States Reorganisation Commission (1953) and the States Reorganisation Act (1956).

Memory hook: One door opened, every door knocked.

Wider path to power

Imagine a village council where only those fluent in English can speak at meetings. When meetings shift to the local language, farmers and shopkeepers start contesting elections.

Which effect of linguistic reorganisation does this mirror?

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. English-only meetings mirror politics dominated by a small English-speaking elite.
  2. The shift to the local language mirrors linguistic states.
  3. New contestants mirror wider participation in leadership.

Answer: Linguistic states opened politics and power to people beyond the English-speaking elite.

Memory hook: Your language, your vote, your voice.

Tricks to remember Reorganisation of States

Short memory aids. Say each one aloud once, then use it on a question the same day.

  • 52-53-56

    Andhra announced 1952, Commission appointed 1953, Act passed 1956.

    Use it when: Core dates.

  • 14 and 6

    The 1956 Act: fourteen states, six union territories.

    Use it when: Outcome of the Act.

  • 56 days

    Sriramulu fasted 56 days; the Act came in '56.

    Use it when: Linking the fast and the Act.

Reorganisation of States: solved examples

Ordered from board level to HOTS. Try each one before you open the solution.

Example 1: The 1956 Act · 1 mark · MCQBoard level

The States Reorganisation Act of 1956 created:
(a) 12 states and 8 union territories
(b) 14 states and 6 union territories
(c) 16 states and 4 union territories
(d) 15 states and 7 union territories

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. NCERT: 14 states and six union territories (1 mark).

Answer: (b) 14 states and 6 union territories

Example 2: Artificial boundaries · 2 marks · Very short answerBoard level

Why did the national movement reject the colonial provincial boundaries, and what did the Congress do after its Nagpur session of 1920? (2 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Colonial boundaries followed administrative convenience or annexation; rejected as artificial (1 mark).
  2. After 1920 the Congress itself was reorganised on the linguistic principle (1 mark).

Answer: Colonial boundaries had been drawn for administrative convenience or simply followed the territories annexed by the British or ruled by the princes, so the national movement rejected them as artificial and promised the linguistic principle as the basis of states. After the Nagpur session of 1920, the Congress recognised this principle as the basis for reorganising the party itself.

Example 3: Assertion and reason: the states of 2000 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level

Assertion (A): Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand were created in 2000.
Reason (R): Every state created after 1956 was formed on the basis of language.
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false.
(d) A is false but R is true.

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. A is true; R is false, because language did not remain the sole basis: these states rested on regional culture or regional imbalance in development (1 mark).

Answer: (c) A is true but R is false.

Example 4: Effects of linguistic states · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level

How did the formation of linguistic states change Indian democracy? (4 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Wider leadership (1 mark).
  2. Uniform basis (1 mark).
  3. Unity strengthened (1 mark).
  4. Acceptance of diversity (1 mark).

Answer: (i) Politics and power were opened to people other than the small English-speaking elite, broadening leadership. (ii) Reorganisation gave a uniform basis for drawing state boundaries in place of colonial administrative lines. (iii) Contrary to early fears, it did not lead to disintegration but strengthened national unity, since regions felt accommodated. (iv) It showed that Indian democracy accepted the principle of diversity, recognising differences, even opposing ones, as part of democratic life.

Example 5: Source-based: a 1953 cartoon · 4 marks · Source-basedHarder board level

Read the description (written for this page) and choose the most appropriate answer for each question.

A 1953 cartoon shows the map of India as a crowded arena in which figures labelled with regional languages push and shove for space, while a worried leader looks on.

(i) The cartoon comments on the demand for:
(A) a uniform national language (B) states based on language (C) the abolition of states (D) separate electorates
(ii) The Telugu-speaking areas that demanded a separate Andhra were then part of the old:
(A) Madras province (B) Bombay state (C) Central Provinces (D) Hyderabad state
(iii) The fast unto death that preceded the formation of Andhra lasted:
(A) 15 days (B) 21 days (C) 56 days (D) 100 days
(iv) Which of the following was NOT among the leadership's reasons for postponing linguistic states?
(A) Fear of disruption and disintegration (B) Diversion from social and economic challenges (C) The unsettled fate of the princely states (D) A ban on regional languages in the Constitution

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. (i) (B): linguistic states (1 mark).
  2. (ii) (A): the old Madras province, which also included present-day Tamil Nadu and parts of Kerala and Karnataka (1 mark).
  3. (iii) (C): Potti Sriramulu died after 56 days (1 mark).
  4. (iv) (D): there was no such ban; the other three are NCERT's reasons (1 mark).

Answer: (i) (B) states based on language; (ii) (A) Madras province; (iii) (C) 56 days; (iv) (D) a ban on regional languages in the Constitution.

Example 6: Long answer: why postpone, why accept · 6 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency

Compare the reasons for which the national leadership postponed linguistic states after independence with the reasons for which it finally accepted them. What changed between 1947 and 1956? (6 marks)

Try it first, then show the solutionSolution
  1. Reasons for postponement (2 marks).
  2. What changed: the Andhra agitation and demands elsewhere (1.5 marks).
  3. Reasons for acceptance; Commission and Act (1.5 marks).
  4. Judgement (1 mark).

Answer: Before independence the national movement had promised the linguistic principle, and after the Nagpur session of 1920 the Congress organised itself on linguistic lines. Yet after 1947 the leadership postponed linguistic states. It feared that carving out states by language might lead to disruption and disintegration; that it would draw attention away from pressing social and economic challenges; that the fate of the princely states was still unsettled; and that the memory of Partition was fresh.

What changed was popular pressure. In the Telugu-speaking areas of the old Madras province the Vishalandhra movement, backed by nearly all political forces in the region, demanded a separate Andhra. Potti Sriramulu, a Congress leader and veteran Gandhian, died on 15 December 1952 after a 56-day fast; violence, police firing and resignations of legislators followed, and the Prime Minister announced Andhra in December 1952. This spurred struggles elsewhere and forced the Centre to appoint the States Reorganisation Commission in 1953, which accepted that state boundaries should reflect languages; the Act of 1956 created 14 states and six union territories.

The reasons for acceptance answered the earlier fears. Accepting the linguistic claims of all regions was expected to reduce, not increase, the threat of division and separatism, and accommodating regional demands was seen as more democratic.

Judgement: the leadership's goal of unity never changed; what changed was its understanding of how to achieve it. Events proved the second view right: reorganisation opened politics beyond the English-speaking elite and strengthened national unity.

Where students lose marks in Reorganisation of States

The slips examiners see most often, and what to write instead.

  • Mistake: Wrong order of dates

    Mixing up the Commission and the Act.

    Wrong working

    The States Reorganisation Commission was set up in 1956.

    Right working

    Andhra 1952, Commission 1953, Act 1956.

    Do this: 52-53-56.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Saying leaders always supported linguistic states

    Missing the postponement.

    Wrong working

    Nehru created linguistic states immediately after independence.

    Right working

    The leadership postponed them; popular agitation forced the change.

    Do this: Hesitation first, then acceptance.

    Usually costs: 1-2 marks.

  • Mistake: Only language as basis

    Ignoring later reorganisations.

    Wrong working

    All Indian states are based only on language.

    Right working

    Later states (2000, 2014) also reflect regional culture or development imbalance.

    Do this: Mention the 2000 states.

    Usually costs: 1 mark.

  • Mistake: Negative-only evaluation

    Repeating the early fears as outcomes.

    Wrong working

    Linguistic states encouraged regionalism and weakened India.

    Right working

    NCERT: they strengthened unity, widened leadership and gave a uniform basis.

    Do this: Use NCERT's four outcomes.

    Usually costs: 2 marks.

Exam tips

  • Asked in: 2025 board paper 59/7/1 Q29(a) (6 marks, reasons for setting up the States Reorganisation Commission and the basis of new states); 2026 board paper 59/3/1 Q19 (4 marks, the government's concerns about language-based reorganisation); 2026 board paper 59/3/1 Q6 (1 mark, why the Commission was appointed in 1953); 2026 board paper 59/1/1 Q2 (1 mark, reason for forming Andhra in 1952). Answers here are our own.
  • Learn Sriramulu's dates: fast from 19 October, death on 15 December 1952.
  • Write '14 states and six union territories' exactly.
  • Evaluation answers should end with NCERT's 'strengthened national unity'.
  • Map questions may ask states carved from older ones: use the Fast Forward table.

Practice questions on Reorganisation of States

Write each answer on paper first. Open the hint only if you are stuck, and the answer only when you have finished.

  1. Q1 · 1 mark · MCQBoard level

    Potti Sriramulu began his fast unto death for a separate Andhra state on:
    (a) 15 August 1947
    (b) 19 October 1952
    (c) 15 December 1952
    (d) 26 January 1950

    Hint

    He died on 15 December 1952.

    Answer

    (b) 19 October 1952.

  2. Q2 · 2 marks · Very short answerBoard level

    Name the three states created in 2000 and state the basis of their creation. (2 marks)

    Hint

    Not language.

    Answer

    Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand. They were created on the basis of distinct regional culture or complaints of regional imbalance in development, not language alone.

  3. Q3 · 2 marks · Very short answerHarder board level

    Why did the leadership finally accept linguistic states despite its fears? Give two reasons. (2 marks)

    Hint

    Separatism; democracy.

    Answer

    (i) It was hoped that accepting the regional and linguistic claims of all regions would reduce the threat of division and separatism. (ii) Accommodating regional demands and forming linguistic states were seen as more democratic, and popular pressure made it necessary.

  4. Q4 · 1 mark · Assertion-reasonHarder board level

    Assertion (A): The bilingual Bombay state was split into Maharashtra and Gujarat in 1960.
    Reason (R): The 1956 Act had converted every state into a single-language state.
    (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
    (b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
    (c) A is true but R is false.
    (d) A is false but R is true.

    Hint

    Bombay remained bilingual after 1956.

    Answer

    (c) A is true but R is false: not all states became linguistic at once; Bombay was split only after a popular agitation.

  5. Q5 · 4 marks · Short answerHarder board level

    Describe the role of Potti Sriramulu and the Vishalandhra movement in the formation of Andhra. (4 marks)

    Hint

    Demand; support; fast; unrest; announcement.

    Answer

    The Vishalandhra movement demanded that the Telugu-speaking areas of the old Madras province, which then included present-day Tamil Nadu and parts of Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Karnataka, be separated into an Andhra province; nearly all political forces in the region supported it. Potti Sriramulu, a Congress leader and veteran Gandhian who had joined the Salt Satyagraha and the individual Satyagraha and had fasted in 1946 for opening temples to dalits, began a fast unto death on 19 October 1952. He died on 15 December 1952 after 56 days. His death caused great unrest: people took to the streets, many were injured or killed in police firing, and several legislators in Madras resigned. The Prime Minister then announced a separate Andhra state in December 1952.

  6. Q6 · 4 marks · Short answerHOTS / competency

    Suppose a group today demands a new state carved out of an existing one, citing neglect in development rather than language. Using the history of reorganisation, argue whether such a demand is legitimate in India's democracy. (4 marks)

    Hint

    Principle of diversity; 2000 states; ongoing demands.

    Answer

    Such a demand has precedent. Language was not the only basis of reorganisation for long: in 2000 Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand were created on grounds of regional culture or imbalance in development, and Telangana followed in 2014. NCERT notes that the story of reorganisation has not ended, with demands such as Vidarbha and Harit Pradesh. Since Indian democracy accepts diversity and accommodation of regional demands proved to strengthen rather than weaken unity, a peaceful demand made through democratic means is legitimate, though the decision must also weigh administrative viability and the interests of the whole state.

  7. Q7 · 6 marks · Long answerHOTS / competency

    "The story of reorganisation has not come to an end." Trace the creation of new states after 1956 and assess whether the basis of reorganisation has changed. (6 marks)

    Hint

    1960 to 2014; language then culture and development; continuing demands.

    Answer

    The 1956 Act did not settle every claim. The bilingual Bombay state, with Gujarati- and Marathi-speaking people, was split into Maharashtra and Gujarat in 1960 after a popular agitation. Punjabi-speaking people demanded their own state; statehood for Punjab came in 1966, when the territories of today's Haryana and Himachal Pradesh were separated from the larger Punjab. Nagaland had become a state in 1963. In the north-east a major reorganisation took place in 1972: Meghalaya was carved out of Assam, and Manipur and Tripura became separate states; Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh followed in 1987.

    The basis then widened. NCERT notes that language did not remain the sole basis of organising states: sub-regions demanded separate states on the grounds of a distinct regional culture or complaints of regional imbalance in development. Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand were created on this basis in 2000, and Telangana emerged on 2 June 2014.

    Demands continue, for Vidarbha in Maharashtra, Harit Pradesh in western Uttar Pradesh and the northern region of West Bengal.

    Assessment: the method has stayed the same, accommodation of regional identities within the constitutional framework, but the basis has broadened from language to culture and development. That continuity of method is why reorganisation has strengthened rather than weakened Indian unity.

Test your recall

Answer in your head or on paper first, then open the card. Pulling an answer out of memory makes it stick far better than re-reading.

  1. 1.At which Congress session was the linguistic principle recognised for reorganising the party?Show answer

    The Nagpur session, 1920.

  2. 2.How many days did Potti Sriramulu fast before he died?Show answer

    56 days.

  3. 3.When was the formation of Andhra announced?Show answer

    December 1952.

  4. 4.For what cause did Potti Sriramulu fast in 1946?Show answer

    For opening temples in Madras province to dalits.

  5. 5.Name one region where demands for a separate state continue, according to NCERT.Show answer

    Vidarbha in Maharashtra, Harit Pradesh in western Uttar Pradesh, or the northern region of West Bengal.

  6. 6.Which two states came into being in 1987?Show answer

    Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh.

Reorganisation of States: frequently asked questions

What did Gandhi say about linguistic provinces in January 1948?

That if linguistic provinces were formed, it would also give a fillip to the regional languages, and that using Hindustani, or still more English, as the medium of instruction in all regions would be absurd.

Were all states formed on the basis of language after 1956?

No. Language did not remain the sole basis: Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand (2000) were created on grounds of regional culture or imbalance in development.

Who was Potti Sriramulu?

A Congress leader and Gandhian whose fast unto death for a separate Andhra state ended with his death on 15 December 1952.

What happened in Madras after Potti Sriramulu's death?

Great unrest: people took to the streets, many were injured or killed in police firing, and several legislators resigned their seats in protest.